What's new

The Eurofighter has lost all its games against the Rafale

aanshu001

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
567
Reaction score
-1
Each time the Eurofighter has been competing against the Rafale, it’s the latter who have lead. Even if this was never a guarantee of success in the end for the french aircraft. India confirms the predominance of the Rafale against the Eurofighter.

Facing the Rafale, the Eurofighter (BAE Systems, EADS and Finmeccanica) just can’t do it … because, despite its few export success (Austria, Saudi Arabia …), this fighter has always been leaded by the french aircraft manufactured by Dassault Aviation in all the competitions in which they both participated. This gives an insight to the victory of the Rafale, selected by New Delhi to enter into exclusive negotiations.
It was the case in the Netherlands in early 2002 when the Dutch air force evaluated the aircrafts in competition (85 fighters). The F-35 Lockheed Martin was slightly ahead of the Rafale (6.97 against 6.95). However, the Eurofighter Typhoon dragged far behind with a score of 5.83. The same year, the aircraft manufactured by the European consortium was eliminated by South Korea at the pre-selection phase (short list) as part of the tender KF-X for the purchase of 40 fighter aircraft . The South Korea Air Force ranked Rafale first among the three aircraft evaluated (F-15E Boeing, Eurofighter) after technical and financial evaluations and offsets. In the end, Boeing had won the competition on purely political criteria.
New duel, this time in the skies of Singapore in 2005. Again, the Ministry of Defence of the city-state, which wants to buy 20 fighter as part of the NFRP tender eliminates the European aircraft. The Rafale in the final faces again the Boeing F-15E. The U.S. offer won in September 2005 on political considerations. The release of Dassault Aviation is also clear: “the US weight gives again due to the Chinese proverb: Bamboo always leans toward the side that push stronger.” Dassault Aviation also lost due to the weak dollar this year.
New cold shower for the Eurofighter, October 1, 2008 in Brazil, which is eliminated from the “F-X2″ competition while the Rafale, the Gripen NG (Saab) and the F-18E / F Super Hornet (Boeing) are shortlisted. In the end, the Brazilians enter into exclusive negotiations with Dassault Aviation, but dramatic turn of events , in December 2010, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said during a TV interview, he will not decide before the end of his term on January 1 for the purchase of 36 fighter planes, an order estimated at between 4 and 7 billion.
The last battle lost by the Eurofighter against the Rafale is recent. It was in Switzerland in 2011, where the Rafale is also topped the evaluations. But it is the Gripen NG[...] which won.

Link: The Eurofighter has lost all its games against the Rafale | idrw.org
 
sort of confusing . what do they term as wins? not orders? cuz up till now Rafael lost all of them to either the US or EF.

Win means - based on the evaluation and performance criteria - Rafale was always ahead of EF. In the end - due to geo political reasons it always faced the boot.
 
EFT is better than Rafale in A2A role any day and it should be since EFT was brought up as air superiority right from its nut/bolts. While rafale was always swing role. For it to be omni role obviously it needed to give some thing away in A2A mode to compensate for A2G mode.

It should be clear that both fighters are a class apart from Su30MKI/J-XX/Mig35 etc.

In current configuration as well as the current squadrons of fighters we have, IAF realized rafale will be the right fit. Hence the result. There is no need to make a such a hue over it.

Give those EFT consortium members some time to digest the result.
 
It should be clear that both fighters are a class apart from Su30MKI/J-XX/Mig35 etc.

Allow me to add Kabuki-2000 and Pimp-3000 fighters along with J-XX. Exactly like J-XX, their specifications are equally unknown. ;)
 
Who runs these ".org"s and can't tell the difference between a plane (Rafale) and a consortium of companies (Eurofighter)?
 
The Rafale won the Korean contest but the US pressured Korea to buy F 15k's instead.
 
Allow me to add Kabuki-2000 and Pimp-3000 fighters along with J-XX. Exactly like J-XX, their specifications are equally unknown. ;)

Dont troll. J-XX in this context doesn't include J20 simply because its 5th gen and rafale is 4+ gen. There is no point in comparing J20 to rafale.

I wont go into details now. Try to search in threads on pdf how much rafale is superior to future J10B etc. ( if u want to contest it, plz open another thread. I will be most obliged to reply )
 
EFT is better than Rafale in A2A role any day and it should be since EFT was brought up as air superiority right from its nut/bolts. While rafale was always swing role. For it to be omni role obviously it needed to give some thing away in A2A mode to compensate for A2G mode.

It should be clear that both fighters are a class apart from Su30MKI/J-XX/Mig35 etc.

In current configuration as well as the current squadrons of fighters we have, IAF realized rafale will be the right fit. Hence the result. There is no need to make a such a hue over it.

Give those EFT consortium members some time to digest the result.

Doubtful, afaik the EFT has never come on top of the Rafale in AtoA be it in technical evaluation by different air-forces or in combat exercise. Yes, EFT does seem to well against other aircraft but never against Rafale.
 
Back
Top Bottom