What's new

The end of the deal, hopes, delusions and treasons


Looks like Sasha Sobhani and maybe his 2.5 million dollar were Biden’s first compromise to Iran.
———-
Sobhani was briefly detained by Spanish authorities at Interpol’s request. Now his extradition process will start in the coming weeks, according to El Mundo. After his release on Jan. 30, Sobhani posted a story on a now-deleted Instagram account telling his followers that all was well. Then a day later, he let loose.
——-
Note how “all is well” is now a part of American vocabulary.
 
Not sure if this was mentioned already

Government spokesman Ali Rabiei said that Iran had started the "pre-processing stage of gas injection" a couple of hours earlier at the Fordow nuclear site, noting that the first UF6 enriched uranium will soon be produced. Speaking to the Islamic Republic News Agency, Rabiei said the government is bound to implementing the new law.

From what I've read, the lower concentration byproduct Uranium Hexafloride (UF6) can be used to produce depleted uranium. This may be very useful for APFSDS rounds in a future Karrar.

The feedstock for enrichment consists of uranium hexafluoride (UF6) from the conversion plant. Following enrichment two streams of UF6 are formed: the enriched ‘product’ containing a higher concentration of U-235 which will be used to make nuclear fuel, and the ‘tails’ containing a lower concentration of U-235, and known as depleted uranium (DU).
Source: WNA Nuclear Fuel Report 2019

That aside, we can always find excuses for increasing our enrichment level. But first we should ask ourselves this question: How much does this increase shorten our breakout time? If it's not a significant number, then it's not worth it. I think moving from 20% to 60% is not worth all the drama it will cause unless there's a well-thought strategy behind it.

The cost from moving from 20% to 90% requires 10% more effort. When you are at 20%, you are actually quite close to 90, which is why they freak out about that number.

1613710255161.png


Look at how rapidly the % of purity for U235 increases with small increases of energy after 20%.
 
Last edited:
The cost from moving from 20% to 90% requires 10% more effort. When you are at 20%, you are actually quite close to 90, which is why they freak out about that number.

View attachment 717582

Look at how rapidly the % of purity for U235 increases with small increases of energy after 20%.
That's what I said. And I had actually posted the very same image on PDF before. lol
 

If they think their blabbering can alter Iran's decision, they are really delusional.
If they don't remove the sanctions by Feb.21, Iran will end the implementation of NPT additional protocol.


3064236.jpg



Don't beg, there wont be any negotiations, just removal of sanctions!
 

If they think their blabbering can alter Iran's decision, they are really delusional.
If they don't remove the sanctions by Feb.21, Iran will end the implementation of NPT additional protocol.


3064236.jpg



Don't beg, there wont be any negotiations, just removal of sanctions!
This dance goes on..but US now changing tune tells you something :

IRAN position is strong ..Zarif ..please shut your mouth and repeat only what the SL said ..This time around they US and Europeans will be running after Iran pleading to stop......I just hope Zarif does not F*ck it up..
 
I just hope Zarif does not F*ck it up..
That bloated putrid pile of filth cant help herself; even now she dreams of swallowing something from biden and kerry and the other all American boys she fell so deeply in love with while living comfortably in the US during the imposed war. Dirty dirty insect...
 
That bloated putrid pile of filth cant help herself; even now she dreams of swallowing something from biden and kerry and the other all American boys she fell so deeply in love with while living comfortably in the US during the imposed war. Dirty dirty insect...
Don't blame him. Blame the people who can remove him but they won't.
 
That bloated putrid pile of filth cant help herself; even now she dreams of swallowing something from biden and kerry and the other all American boys she fell so deeply in love with while living comfortably in the US during the imposed war. Dirty dirty insect...
Well he defended Iran many times too I don't think this language is helping ... I think in compassion to his
predecessors he fits more in his position ...
 
I think this back and force and this state of chaos in Formal stance about Foreign diplomacy is part of I.R plan to confuse USA and the west and dontlet them to make decisive decision ...

خیلی فکر کردم ، این آشوبی که در سیاست خارجی ج.ا هست ، بخشی از نقشه ی درونی نظامه تا غرب و آمریکا همیشه با چند راهی مواجهه باشه و نتونه تصمیم قطعی بگیره ...

وگرنه سر قضیه ی آبان 98 کل نظام و اصلاح طلب و اصولگرا و به اصطلاح اپوزیسیون همه و همه تصمیم واحد گرفتند
 
Don't blame him. Blame the people who can remove him but they won't.

Republicans hate Kerry the same way, Zarif is hated in Iran.

To make a deal soft tone is also occasionally needed. Making deal is not just playing the hard ball and escalate. Otherwise, you will look like Trump. Unable to make a deal and only risking more and more escalations.

Zarif should be used at the right time and the right place. We definitely do not need Zarif for likes of Pompeo ever. Zarif was useless for four years. Now he can occasionally play with likes of Blinken.
 
IAEA and Iran strike three-month deal over nuclear inspections
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/21/iran-pushes-ahead-plan-cut-un-nuclear-inspections
Agreement paves way for diplomatic talks between Tehran and the US over sanctions
The UN’s nuclear inspectorate has struck a three-month deal with Iran giving it sufficient continued access to verify nuclear activity in the country, opening the space for wider political and diplomatic talks between Tehran and the US.
Iran will go ahead with its threat to withdraw this week from the additional protocol, the agreement that gives inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) intrusive powers.

However, following a weekend of talks with officials in Tehran, the IAEA’s director general, Rafael Grossi, announced that he had struck what he described as “a temporary bilateral technical understanding” that will mitigate the impact of Iran’s withdrawal from the protocol, and give the IAEA confidence that it can continue to verify Iran’s nuclear activity.

Grossi added that the move “salvages the situation” and avoids the position of the inspectors “flying blind”. He said the agreement, from which either side can withdraw, gave space for wider diplomatic discussions between the US and Iran to go ahead.
He said the law suspending Iran from the additional protocol had been passed by its parliament and now “exists and is going to be applied. There is less access, let’s face it.”
However, Grossi made clear he felt the new bilateral agreement sufficiently mitigated the impact of the reduced inspections regime, so it was therefore worthwhile for his team’s verification work continuing, at least on a temporary basis. “This is a temporary solution that allows us to continue to give to the world the assurances of what is going on there in the hope that we can return to a fuller picture.”
The IAEA director general added that there would be no reduction in the number of inspectors, and that not all snap inspections would be banned.
Iranian officials have said the agreement will mean that the inspectors will only have 70% of the access they now enjoy, but Grossi declined to put a percentage on the loss of access.
The deal, released late on Sunday night, was met with an immediate backlash in Iran, where furious hardliners convened an emergency session of parliament to demand more details. Some claimed it effectively overrode the law passed by parliament two months ago cutting back on inspections.
Iran’s atomic energy association said it would continue to use cameras to record and maintain information at its nuclear sites for three months, but would retain the information exclusively. If the US sanctions are lifted completely within that period, Iran will provide this information to the IAEA, otherwise it will be deleted forever.
Grossi will have to report the details of his understanding to the other signatories of the nuclear deal, including France, Germany and the UK. All three had warned Iran of the serious consequences of withdrawing from the protocol, and they will need to be satisfied by the IAEA director on the value of the technical understanding.
All sides are involved in brinkmanship designed to bring about direct talks between the US and Iran leading to the US, on the one hand, lifting economic sanctions and returning to the deal, and Iran coming back into compliance with the agreement. Iran has not left the deal, but over the past year lessened its commitments on critical issues such as levels of uranium enrichment and the use of advanced centrifuges.
Iran’s foreign minister, Javad Zarif, said in an interview with the state-owned Press TV that Iran was waiting for action from the US, not promises, and said the cutback in inspections had been mandated by Iran’s parliament and could not be overridden until sanctions were lifted. “We need concrete actions, not words,” he said.
The US has offered to attend an informal diplomatic meeting hosted by the EU, also attended by Russia and China, the other signatories to the deal. The US state department has hinted that at this meeting the US would map out an offer on how sanctions and other economic restrictions could be lifted or suspended if Iran returned to compliance with the nuclear deal, including over uranium enrichment stocks and use of advanced centrifuges.
Zarif said Iran would need to know how, if the US returned to the deal, it would not simply walk out again. He said the issue of compensation for the $1tn (£710bn) damage inflicted on the Iranian economy would also have to be discussed.
Hardliners are demanding that any sanctions suspension would need to be verified, something that would prolong a complex process.
 
IAEA and Iran strike three-month deal over nuclear inspections
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/21/iran-pushes-ahead-plan-cut-un-nuclear-inspections
Agreement paves way for diplomatic talks between Tehran and the US over sanctions
The UN’s nuclear inspectorate has struck a three-month deal with Iran giving it sufficient continued access to verify nuclear activity in the country, opening the space for wider political and diplomatic talks between Tehran and the US.
Iran will go ahead with its threat to withdraw this week from the additional protocol, the agreement that gives inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) intrusive powers.

However, following a weekend of talks with officials in Tehran, the IAEA’s director general, Rafael Grossi, announced that he had struck what he described as “a temporary bilateral technical understanding” that will mitigate the impact of Iran’s withdrawal from the protocol, and give the IAEA confidence that it can continue to verify Iran’s nuclear activity.

Grossi added that the move “salvages the situation” and avoids the position of the inspectors “flying blind”. He said the agreement, from which either side can withdraw, gave space for wider diplomatic discussions between the US and Iran to go ahead.
He said the law suspending Iran from the additional protocol had been passed by its parliament and now “exists and is going to be applied. There is less access, let’s face it.”
However, Grossi made clear he felt the new bilateral agreement sufficiently mitigated the impact of the reduced inspections regime, so it was therefore worthwhile for his team’s verification work continuing, at least on a temporary basis. “This is a temporary solution that allows us to continue to give to the world the assurances of what is going on there in the hope that we can return to a fuller picture.”
The IAEA director general added that there would be no reduction in the number of inspectors, and that not all snap inspections would be banned.
Iranian officials have said the agreement will mean that the inspectors will only have 70% of the access they now enjoy, but Grossi declined to put a percentage on the loss of access.
The deal, released late on Sunday night, was met with an immediate backlash in Iran, where furious hardliners convened an emergency session of parliament to demand more details. Some claimed it effectively overrode the law passed by parliament two months ago cutting back on inspections.
Iran’s atomic energy association said it would continue to use cameras to record and maintain information at its nuclear sites for three months, but would retain the information exclusively. If the US sanctions are lifted completely within that period, Iran will provide this information to the IAEA, otherwise it will be deleted forever.
Grossi will have to report the details of his understanding to the other signatories of the nuclear deal, including France, Germany and the UK. All three had warned Iran of the serious consequences of withdrawing from the protocol, and they will need to be satisfied by the IAEA director on the value of the technical understanding.
All sides are involved in brinkmanship designed to bring about direct talks between the US and Iran leading to the US, on the one hand, lifting economic sanctions and returning to the deal, and Iran coming back into compliance with the agreement. Iran has not left the deal, but over the past year lessened its commitments on critical issues such as levels of uranium enrichment and the use of advanced centrifuges.
Iran’s foreign minister, Javad Zarif, said in an interview with the state-owned Press TV that Iran was waiting for action from the US, not promises, and said the cutback in inspections had been mandated by Iran’s parliament and could not be overridden until sanctions were lifted. “We need concrete actions, not words,” he said.
The US has offered to attend an informal diplomatic meeting hosted by the EU, also attended by Russia and China, the other signatories to the deal. The US state department has hinted that at this meeting the US would map out an offer on how sanctions and other economic restrictions could be lifted or suspended if Iran returned to compliance with the nuclear deal, including over uranium enrichment stocks and use of advanced centrifuges.
Zarif said Iran would need to know how, if the US returned to the deal, it would not simply walk out again. He said the issue of compensation for the $1tn (£710bn) damage inflicted on the Iranian economy would also have to be discussed.
Hardliners are demanding that any sanctions suspension would need to be verified, something that would prolong a complex process.

the inspections are will be illegal and soon will crackdown on

قالیباف: اجرای پروتکل الحاقی باید متوقف شود/دسترسی فراپادمانی غیرقانونی است

thess is three months move is all for Presidential election to make sure that next President come out to be reformist


soon IAEA will understand that, the area of messing about has reached its end
 
Following the treason of government in full implementation of Parliament law, 228 members of of Iranian Parliament (97%) voted to file a complaint to Judiciary against Rouhani (president) and Salehi (the head of AEOI ).

موافقت مجلس با ارجاع پرونده دولت به قوه قضاییه به خاطر استنکاف از قانون لغو تحریم‌ها | خبرگزاری فارس

The era of free treason is over.
Although I have never been a fan of JCPOA or this Rouhani government I see this 3 month " limited take a peak" not such a bad thing and this is why:

1- It allows Iran to continue enrichments at 20% or higher without making a crisis out of it.

2- If you recall there was a report that US has real problem with lifting sanctions in practical terms (forcing banks and big companies to deal with Iran) . Iran has put condition that "Action" rather than "signature" is the only acceptable criteria for Iran. This 3 months is very good chance for Iran to observe the actions being worked out...US will either start working on the banks or will start putting more military assets around Iran..either case Iran can see what these three months are really for.
3- Iran did legally cancel the additional protocol as per law. Gave this three months "limited visibility" to IAEA as a separate item. IAEA guy must have had some assurance from US to ask for this 3 months so Look for any signs in the filed for action..today I heard Koreans giving some of the frozen fund back..to me that is "action" happening.

4- For the first time it is "them" running after "Iran" to stop... and I like that a lot.:azn:
 
Back
Top Bottom