XiaoYaoZi
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2014
- Messages
- 546
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Change the word "shrine" to "toilet"
The difference between CPC and KMT
- Thread starter ChineseTiger1986
- Start date
Chinese-Dragon
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 33,932
- Reaction score
- 52
- Country
- Location
Nothing surprising for a traitor like Jiang Gaisi.
S10
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 6,066
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
I'll tell you what the difference between the CPC and KMT mindset is, which determined each of their fate.
CPC places emphasis on self-reliance and mobilizing the working class for its goals. It is also good at picking the right people for the right job, and developing talents from the bottom. While this hasn't always been consistent, it has been the general pattern. There is a deviation from this in recent years due to corruption, but that's another subject on its own.
The KMT, on the other hand, runs around begging for foreign help the moment trouble hits. It relied on an oligarchy of wealthy families and powerful warlords to maintain its rule, therefore disconnected from the peasants, workers and even middle class. The lack of backbone is apparent by the fact that it didn't have the guts to declare war on Japan until 1941 after the Americans had done so, despite the fact that Japan already launched a full invasion in 1937. Its leadership were notoriously incompetent and corrupt, botching the war effort and losing the entire country to communists within a decade. Even this day, they're still serving as America's pawn against China despite claiming to be the "legitimate" government of China.
CPC places emphasis on self-reliance and mobilizing the working class for its goals. It is also good at picking the right people for the right job, and developing talents from the bottom. While this hasn't always been consistent, it has been the general pattern. There is a deviation from this in recent years due to corruption, but that's another subject on its own.
The KMT, on the other hand, runs around begging for foreign help the moment trouble hits. It relied on an oligarchy of wealthy families and powerful warlords to maintain its rule, therefore disconnected from the peasants, workers and even middle class. The lack of backbone is apparent by the fact that it didn't have the guts to declare war on Japan until 1941 after the Americans had done so, despite the fact that Japan already launched a full invasion in 1937. Its leadership were notoriously incompetent and corrupt, botching the war effort and losing the entire country to communists within a decade. Even this day, they're still serving as America's pawn against China despite claiming to be the "legitimate" government of China.
Similar threads
