What's new

The cost to fix America's crumbling infrastructure? Nearly $2.6 trillion, engineers say

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
The cost to fix America's crumbling infrastructure? Nearly $2.6 trillion, engineers say
By Tami Luhby, CNN

Updated 7:02 AM ET, Tue March 30, 2021

(CNN)With the money from his $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief law starting to flow, President Joe Biden is turning his attention to his next massive investment package -- a two-part infrastructure and jobs proposal that could total $3 trillion.

The funding is sorely needed, experts say. From roads to public transit, from dams to airports, the nation's infrastructure is falling apart.

The price tag to bring it into good repair? Nearly $2.6 trillion over 10 years, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers.

Biden to lay out first piece of sweeping infrastructure and jobs package Wednesday

The US scored a C- in the society's 2021 infrastructure report card, released earlier this month. It's the first time that the nation received a grade higher than the D range since the survey began in 1998. Still, the funding gap is widening, up from the roughly $2.1 trillion estimated in the society's 2017 survey.


The President is expected to discuss Wednesday his infrastructure plans "so that we can compete and create significant numbers of really good-paying jobs. Really good-paying jobs," he said in a news conference last week.

He pointed to roads in poor condition, bridges that need repairs, flights that are delayed, water pipes that still contain lead and schools that lack adequate ventilation.

Infrastructure improvements have long enjoyed bipartisan support from lawmakers and presidents -- though often with different priorities of what should get funding. Also, pumping money into the nation's roads, bridges and other areas is also seen as a way to help lift the nation out of a recession since it creates jobs, both directly and indirectly.

A $2.1 trillion boost to public infrastructure spending over a decade could create 2.3 million jobs by 2024 and inject $5.7 trillion into the economy by 2029, according to an S&P Global report from last May.

The bump in economic activity may be somewhat smaller now since fiscal conditions have improved, but it still would be considerable, said Beth Ann Bovino, S&P Global's chief US economist.

"Infrastructure pays for itself if it's done wisely," she said. "It's the grease that keeps the economy moving along."

Biden is expected to propose paying the infrastructure tab with a tax hike on businesses, including raising the corporate rate to 28%, up from the current 21%.

Some improvement since 2017
While the nation's overall infrastructure standing improved slightly from the engineers' last report card in 2017, 11 of 17 categories still received marks in the D range, including aviation, dams, levees, public parks, roads, schools and wastewater.
The highest grade, of B, went to the rail category, while the lowest was a D- for transit systems. Five areas improved from the 2017 report, including drinking water, energy and ports, while bridges slipped in its rating.

State and local governments have made progress in tackling the problems, the society said. Some 37 states have raised their gas tax to pay for transportation projects since 2010, and 98% of local infrastructure ballot initiatives passed last November. Plus, federal funding has increased for ports, drinking water and inland waterways.

Some areas in particular need of help: More than 40% of the nation's roads are in poor or mediocre condition. Some 15% of wastewater treatment plants have reached or exceeded their design capacity. Among school districts that report data, just over half say they need to update or replace multiple building systems, including heating, air conditioning and ventilation.

State and local parks face $5.6 billion and $60 billion deferred maintenance backlogs, respectively. The number of deficient, high-hazard-potential dams is now estimated to exceed 2,300. And 7.5% of the nation's bridges are considered structurally deficient.

The failure to act will cost American families $3,300 annually, on average, over the next 20 years, said Greg DiLoreto, past president of the society. This includes getting one's car fixed after hitting a pothole or buying bottled water after a storm upends municipal systems.

"The bottom line is it affects your quality of life and our economic prosperity," said DiLoreto, pointing to the recent water crisis in Jackson, Mississippi, and the hours truckers spend stuck in traffic on their way to and from ports. "You can see that every day."

 
.
Many ignorant people criticize China and say China's massive infrastructure push can not be sustainable, finally some wise people in the west see why it is.
 
.
This includes getting one's car fixed after hitting a pothole

This is simply a local taxation issue...and the very key to understanding most of the problems. You build infrastructure to support a given population base expecting to generate income from the people and businesses using that infrastructure to pay for the upkeep.

What happens when the people and businesses leave?

The people remaining are usually low income and they can't generate the income needed to support that elaborate infrastructure.

What happens to the 137 year old Boston subway system when their prime user base buys cars, moves to the suburbs, and work in suburban office parks? It ends up shuffling around lower income people and fare increases would only dissuade their user base.
 
Last edited:
.
This is simply a local taxation issue...and the key to understanding most of the problems. You build infrastructure to support a given population base expecting to generate income from the people and businesses using that infrastructure.

What happens when the people and businesses leave?

The people remaining are usually low income and they can't generate the income needed to support that elaborate infrastructure.
You can have a thousand excuses for not to do something. let's see in 10 years or 20 years what Americans will say after being stuck in the same crappy infrastrucuture.
 
.
You can have a thousand excuses for not to do something. let's see in 10 years or 20 years what Americans will say after being stuck in the same crappy infrastrucuture.

Why wait 10 or 20?? That isn't going to make a difference.
You could have easily posed the same question in 1975. Same exact issues. Probably even worse actually.

The problem with Chinese mentality is you think the modern world started in 1995. In reality it was more like 1885. You guys are just very very late.

It 1900 it was "cool" to live/move to a modern city in the US. By 1950 that wore off.
 
Last edited:
.
Why wait 10 or 20?? That isn't going to make a difference.
You could have easily posed the same question in 1975. Same exact issues. Probably even worse actually.

The problem with Chinese mentality is you think the modern world started in 1995. In reality it was more like 1885. You guys are just very very late.
Your modern world started in 1885 and stays in 1885, our modern world started in 2000's and keeps developing fast year on year.
 
.
Your modern world started in 1885 and stays in 1885, our modern world started in 2000's and keeps developing fast year on year.

I'm sure 70 years ago people steadfastly said the exact same thing about living in Mao's rural Chinese perfectly happy "modern world" communes...and flat-out refused to picture anything better. Scoffing at all other societies (especially Western) as being "stupid".

Move to 1995 and now Western style skyscraper cities are the latest "thing". Communes are now suddenly "stupid".

40 years from now something else will probably catch your eye...but alas again you refuse to see it. Scoffing at everybody else.

Just like your "stupid" communes...we moved on.
 
Last edited:
.
I'm sure 70 years ago people steadfastly said the exact same thing about living in Mao's rural Chinese perfectly happy communes...and flat-out refused to picture anything better. Scoffing at all other societies.

Move to 1995 and now cities are the latest "thing". Communes are suddenly "stupid".

40 years from now something else will probably catch your eye...but alas again you refuse to see it. Scoffing at everybody else.

Just like your "stupid" communes...we moved on.
No one remembers what a commune was like now, but at least for now, we are moving on and you are not, you are busy making excuses not to move on.
 
.
No one remembers what a commune was like now, but at least for now, we are moving on and you are not, you are busy making excuses not to move on.

LOL! How are we not moving on? Many people don't know what a dense major city is like anymore. To us THAT's moving on.
 
Last edited:
. .
Biden decides to move on, but it's a bit too late and we don't know if his can pull it off.

He's probably going to do the stupid Liberal thing no doubt. Spend money fixing extensive urban infrastructure that middle class+ families don't use anymore...and only to see it in 40 years go back to the way it is today because the people there can't afford to maintain it.
 
Last edited:
.
Biden decides to move on, but it's a bit too late and we don't know if his can pull it off.

Biden is a senile old man.. America went from lunatic Trump to senile Biden... Not good for a dying super power perspective...
 
.
He's probably going to do the stupid Liberal thing no doubt. Spend money fixing urban infrastructure that middle class+ families don't uses anymore...and only to see it in 40 years go back to the way it is today because the people there can't afford to maintain it.
If you guys are happy with your crappy infrastruture and being laughed by the world, fine.
 
.
If you guys are happy with your crappy infrastruture and being laughed by the world, fine.

A good portion of the US wants old cities razed just like your communes.

Would solve a huge percentage of infrastructure problems in an instant.
 
Last edited:
. .

Latest posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom