Solomon2
BANNED
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2008
- Messages
- 19,475
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
Judge threw out original indictment on a technicality but she has been re-indicted.Your own judge threw out the matter from court. Respect your courts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Judge threw out original indictment on a technicality but she has been re-indicted.Your own judge threw out the matter from court. Respect your courts.
Judge threw out original indictment on a technicality but she has been re-indicted.
No, it was when she had immunity that mattered. She got immunity on Jan 8th and was indicted on Jan 9th. That was improper, the court said, and quashed this indictment. However, once Khobragade returned to India (on Jan 10th, I think) she had no immunity. So Khobragade has been re-indicted.The court categorically stated that miss Khobragade had diplomatic immunity. That ends everything right there.
No, it was when she had immunity that mattered. She got immunity on Jan 8th and was indicted on Jan 9th. That was improper, the court said, and quashed this indictment. However, once Khobragade returned to India (on Jan 10th, I think) she had no immunity. So Khobragade has been re-indicted.
No, sir. The court made its ruling on the basis that she couldn't be indicted while she had immunity, only before or after.Exactly, she lost her immunity once she got back to India not before that, as your own court has held. Now respect that please and move on with this thread.