What's new

The Cold Arab-Israeli Alliance Against Iran

Solomon2

BANNED
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
19,475
Reaction score
-37
Country
United States
Location
United States
wa-logo_0.png



Dispatches

Michael J. Totten

The Cold Arab-Israeli Alliance Against Iran
19 April 2016


Israel and the Sunni Arab states inched closer together diplomatically and geopolitically last week when Egypt transferred control of Tiran and Sanafir islands to Saudi Arabia.

It’s not initially obvious why the control of two uninhabited islands moving from one Arab country to another would even affect Israel let alone suggest that Israel’s relations with its neighbors might be improving. The answer lies in the past. These islands have been flashpoints a number of times during the Arab-Israeli conflict, but they won’t be anymore.

They have no value in and of themselves—no resources, no people, no nothing—but look at a map. The two islands bottleneck the Straits of Tiran between the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aqaba. Any ships that want to reach Israel or Jordan from the south have to pass through there, and the passage is only a few miles across. A fit person could swim from one side to the other without too much trouble.

In 1950, during the early days of the Arab-Israeli conflict, the Saudis asked the more-powerful Egyptians to take control of these islands because they feared the Israelis might seize them. Just as the Saudis feared, six years later the Israelis took Tiran Island during the Suez Crisis in 1956, and again in 1967 when Egyptian ruler Gamal Abdel Nasser blockaded the straits and precipitated the Six Day War. The Saudis wouldn’t have been able to hold the Israelis back, but as it turned out, neither could the Egyptians.

Things have settled down in the meantime. The Egyptians and Saudis aren’t worried about Israel anymore. There’s no point. The Israelis are spectacularly uninterested in another war with Egypt, and they’ve never fought a war with the Saudis. Cairo and Riyadh—like most Arab capitals—are far more worried about Iran, especially now that Washington is letting Tehran come in from the cold as part of the nuclear “deal.”

So Egypt returned control of Tiran and Sanafir islands to Saudi Arabia.

Egypt’s dictator General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has turned out to be a staunch champion of the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty, not because he loves the Israelis—surely he doesn’t—but because, like all Egyptian Army officers, he’s painfully aware that another war with Israel would be just as stupid and pointless as the previous wars with Israel and that Egypt would get its *** kicked all over again for nothing. And he’s realistic enough to know that the Israelis won’t wake up some random morning and decide to bomb Cairo just for the hell of it.

The transfer of the islands back to the Saudis “relates to us and it does not bother us,” Israeli Knesset member Tzachi Hanegb said. “The Saudis, who are committed to freedom of shipping under international law, will not harm the essence of the agreement between Egypt and us in this regard, and freedom of shipping in Aqaba and Eilat will remain as is.”

The Saudis are congenitally incapable of saying anything friendly about Israel in public—behind closed doors, the Saudis get along with Israel fine—but Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir nevertheless said, “There is an agreement and commitments that Egypt accepted related to these islands, and the kingdom is committed to these.”

He’s referring to the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty, signed by Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin in 1979, which guarantees passage of Israeli ships through the Straits of Tiran.

By publicly agreeing to respect Israel’s right to this particular international waterway, the Saudis are implicitly agreeing to at least part of the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty despite the fact that no formal peace treaty exists yet between Jerusalem and Riyadh.

How far those two little islands have come. They started out as pieces on the board in the region-wide Arab-Israeli conflict, and now they symbolize a long overdue thaw.

Israelis and Arabs may never like each other, but they don’t have to. Look at the Greeks and the Turks. They’ve hated each other’s guts for hundreds of years, they ethnically cleansed each other in 1923 and again on the island of Cyprus in the 1970s, but the Soviet Union was a lightning rod during the Cold War, and they set aside their longstanding hostility and agreed to work with each other within the framework of NATO.

Israel was similarly a kind of lightning rod in the Middle East that unified the Arabs, but today Iran is the lightning rod. The real threat from Iran is uniting most of the Arab states, and it’s triggering a serious rethink about the non-threat from the Jewish state.

It’s the Iranian government’s greatest diplomatic and propaganda failure. When the revolutionary regime seized power from the Shah in 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini attempted to rally the Arab world behind him by singling out the so-called Zionist Entity as a threat to all Muslims. He had his work cut out for him. Hatred of Jews was never as strong a force in Persian culture as it historically has been in Arab culture. For Persians, Arabs—not Jews—were and are the ancient implacable foe. Iran had excellent relations with Israel until 1979 and would still enjoy excellent relations with Israel today if the Khomeinists had not taken over.

The most intractable fault lines in the Middle East are between Sunnis and Shias and between Arabs and Persians, and Iran has both a Persian and a Shia majority. Iran’s rulers can’t easily become the hegemons of an entire region that hates them. Their best bet, perhaps their only bet, was to unite all Muslims—Sunni, Shia, Arab and Persian—against the Jews.

So Khomeini abandoned Iran’s alliance with Israel and threw its support behind terrorist armies like Hamas and Hezbollah.

In The Persian Night, Amir Taheri sums up Khomeini’s pitch to the Arabs this way: “Forget that Iran is Shia, and remember that today it is the only power capable of realizing your most cherished dream, the destruction of Israel. The Sunni Muslim Brotherhood promised you it would throw the Jews into the sea in 1948, but failed. Pan-Arab nationalists, led by Nasser, ushered you into one of your biggest defeats in history, enabling Israel to capture Jerusalem. The Baathists under Saddam Hussein promised to ’burn Israel,’ but ended up bringing the American infidels to Baghdad. Yasser Arafat and the Palestinian ’patriots’ promised to crush the Jewish state, but turned into collaborators on its payroll. Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda never gave two hoots about Palestine, focusing only on spectacular operations in the West to win publicity for themselves. Sheikh Ahmad Yassin and Hamas did all they could to destroy Israel but lacked the power, like flies attacking an elephant. The only force now willing and able to help realize your dream of a burned Israel and drowning the Jews is the Islamic Republic as created by Khomeini.”

It was a clever plan, but it failed, and its failure is a little more obvious with each passing year. Israel could have been the lighting rod that brought Arabs and Persians, and Sunnis and Shias, together. Instead, the Semitic tribes are slowly inching together. Not warmly—that’s for damn sure—but the Greeks and Turks, along with the Americans and the Saudis, showed the world a long time ago that cold alliances can work almost as effectively.
 
.
Arabs and Jews (50% of all modern-day Jews hail from Arab countries originally) could have worked closely together like many times throughout history, had the Zionists been a lot more sensible when they created Israel.
Not to mention the gigantic political failure of almost every Israeli government (aside from Rabin) to actively work for a Palestinian state and the ill treatment of Palestinians that have persisted to this very day. Israel is a reality but so is Palestine. One is already established but the other lacks the rights to do the same. How about Israelis work towards that for the betterment of both parties?

Palestinians are defenseless against you no matter how much you demonize them and you have the power to make the right decision to create peace and a two-state solution but despite this new settlements continue to be built in the West Bank. Would any sane person consider this as a sign of peace or as a outstretched hand?

Most of the solutions can be found here below:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Peace_Initiative

There will come a point in time where Arab states and Israel will work together for the betterment of the region due to common interests and out of necessity but the time has not come yet. Far from it. Israeli politicians know what to do in order for that to change.

Iran is another discussion altogether and not directly related to the core of the Palestinian question nor do they pose a threat to the 450 million Arabs. Thinking otherwise is a joke. There are hostilities today but Arabs will continue to dominate Arab states and no outside party will ever prevent that on the long run. Just like nobody will prevent a future Palestinian state from emerging.

Why is @Falcon29 banned?
 
Last edited:
.
Arabs and Jews (50% of all modern-day Jews hail from Arab countries originally) could have worked closely together like many times throughout history, had the Zionists been a lot more sensible when they created Israel.
Specifics?

Not to mention the gigantic political failure of almost every Israeli government (aside from Rabin) to actively work for a Palestinian state -
Did KSA go to war to strip Gaza from the Egyptians, or Judea-Samaria from the Jordanians?

and the ill treatment of Palestinians that have persisted to this very day.
I've noticed that the Palestinian Arabs are far more abused by their fellow Arabs and political leaders than by Israel. Have you seen pictures of the camps in Syria and Lebanon?

Israel is a reality but so is Palestine.
I have my doubts. The Jews have been a distinct people for thousands of years with a history of statehood. The "Palestine" of old had nothing to do with Arabs. Fifteen Arab villages in Palestine sent a letter to the post-WWI Paris Peace conference affirming that they were part of southern Syria. From 1900 to 1960 or so "Palestinian" was a label applied to the region's Jews. Hundreds of thousands of rootless Arabs flocked into Mandate Palestine during the interwar years, to fill places in the booming Zionist-led economy. In 1947 the Palestinian Arabs, along with the surrounding Arab states, rejected the 1947 U.N. proposal for a separate Palestinian Arab state in favor of seeking the Jews' total destruction. It has been the U.N. agency created after their failure has done everything to nurture a separate "Palestinian" identity, one uniquely founded not upon its own peoplehood, but negating that of the Jews. How "real" is that?

One is already established but the other lacks the rights to do the same. How about Israelis work towards that for the betterment of both parties?
Few Arabs are willing to acknowledge that Israel is actually doing this. (Pakistanis, of course, are forbidden to do so.)

Palestinians are defenseless against you no matter how much you demonize them -
What do you call "defenseless"? Sure, the Palestinian Arabs don't have anti-aircraft weapons, tanks, etc. Arabs are more surely defended by Israel's demonstrated ethics than by aggression against Israel, yes?

- and you have the power to make the right decision to create peace and a two-state solution...
I don't think anybody can convince the Palestinian Arabs to accept that right now.

but despite this new settlements continue to be built in the West Bank. Would any sane person consider this as a sign of peace or as a outstretched hand?
Of course. Jews build settlements there under international law - the Palestine Mandate. They have the legal right to do so. On the other hand, the Arabs did not have the legal right to kick Jews out of the lands that came under their political control. Hundreds of thousands of Jews were pushed against their will, into tiny trade-boycotted Israel, apparently in an attempt to starve the young state to death.

Most of the solutions can be found here below:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Peace_Initiative
There's no justification that Arabs can currently behave in the civilized fashion that the API implies. But there is every indication Israel does just that.

There will come a point in time where Arab states and Israel will work together for the betterment of the region due to common interests and out of necessity but the time has not come yet. Far from it. Israeli politicians know what to do in order for that to change.
Certainly. Many are waiting for Arabs - especially Muslims - to change. To recognize that bombs and bombast don't bring peace and prosperity or good-neighborliness and that minorities have inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property. Until then they will do their best to keep the Jews of Israel alive and free.

Iran is another discussion altogether and not directly related to the core of the Palestinian question nor do they pose a threat to the 450 million Arabs. Thinking otherwise is a joke. There are hostilities today but Arabs will continue to dominate Arab states and no outside party will ever prevent that on the long run.
I don't think the Iranian mullahs are joking. Neither do the Lebanese suffering under Hezbollah's domination, or the Yemenis suddenly threatened by Iran-armed Houthis, or the Egyptians who cite Iran as supporting separatists in the Sinai, etc.
 
.
@Solomon2

What do you mean by specifics? 50% of all living Jews are Mizrahi Jews and 90% of them originated in Arab countries. They are today called Yemeni, Iraqi, Moroccan, Syrian, Tunisian, Libyan, Algerian, Egyptian etc. Jews. To this very day, almost 70 years after the Jewish exodus from the Arab world, Arab Jews from Arab countries such as Morocco and Yemen migrate to Israel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_and_Muslim_countries

Latest arrivals:





Whole Israeli towns to this day are dominated by Arab Jews.

For example almost all of your cuisine that you call Israeli cuisine is Arab or Eastern European cuisine.

Your remaining post is the usual nonsense I am afraid and you do take ZERO responsibility for any Israeli wrongdoing. If one reads your posts here as some read the Bible, one would get the impression that Israel behaved as a supreme all-knowledgeable and just God 24/7.

Anyway let's cut the crap and go straight for it.

What does Israel actually do (concrete policies) to help create an Palestinian state?
 
.
@Solomon2

What do you mean by specifics?
How could the Zionists have been "a lot more sensible"?

Your remaining post is the usual nonsense I am afraid and you do take ZERO responsibility for any Israeli wrongdoing.
On the contrary: Zionists take great responsibility for such, as serious legal and moral matters. But refusing to embrace lies and fraud are part of the same process..

If one reads your posts here as some read the Bible, one would get the impression that Israel behaved as a supreme all-knowledgeable and just God 24/7.
I think only people who lack confidence in the ability of humans to sort good from evil do that. It's cynicism.

What does Israel actually do (concrete policies) to help create an Palestinian state?
You previously wrote, "peace and a two-state solution." Keeping Israel alive and independent is part of that. Keeping foreign powers from dominating the Palestinian Arab areas and political process is part of that. Establishing rule-of-law and supporting a growing Palestinian Arab economy is part of that. Establishing Arab universities is part of that. (The list goes on and on, but I'm sure you'd believe it more if you did the research yourself, yes? )

On the other hand, your current question - assuming that Israel is obliged to create a Palestinian state whose citizenry and political leaders currently do not accept its Zionist neighbor - is not something Israel should be working towards, nor does anyone have a legal or moral right to demand it.
 
.
It's an honor to have Apartheid state of Israel and some despotic Arab dictatorships ganging up against you. Iran should be proud of this. This unholy alliance is a great opportunity for us.
 
.
It's an honor to have Apartheid state of Israel and some despotic Arab dictatorships ganging up against you. Iran should be proud of this. This unholy alliance is a great opportunity for us.

Quit the comedy. Iranian secular nationalists (who prior to 1979 were the biggest Israeli lovers in the region) such as yourself do not care the slightest about Palestinian Arabs (you even wrote this yourself on a few occasions here on PDF and when you discussed with @Falcon29 ). Rather your main goal and enemy are the Arabs whom you hated before 1979 and will continue to hate.

If Israel was not hostile to Iran you would cheer openly for them or at best support them silently.

You might fool a few Pakistanis here but rest assured that 99% of all Arabs today know your likes real intentions.

Can you see this map?

2vb3l9f.png


It ensures that your fairytale dreams of "regional hegemony" will never happen. This post is not aimed at genuinely religious Iranians or educated Iranians who disagree with such idiotic notions.

At least be honest. This way more people would take you seriously. Despite you propagandizing otherwise, by FAR the vast majority of Arabs have no problem with Iranians. Our grievances or hostility is not racially motivated like with your likes. Which events prior to 1979 confirm for the entire world to see. Or GCC's history of welcoming and integrating Iranians (Iranian Arabs, Lurs and Persians) into their society. It's aimed at your regime who ironically are of ARAB origin or claim to be at least.

Let me remind you of the fact that the GCC is home to the largest Iranian diaspora in the world after the US. It's your oldest diaspora alongside Iraq where you diaspora today is gone.
 
Last edited:
.
You might fool a few Pakistanis here
Hi,

Please dont drag us in this shit. Bedouins VS Mullahs. When was the last time you lot people of Saud actually went into war with Jews. As for Mullahs we are well aware of their contra affair !

It had never been about ummah, both of these sick entities are trying to grab power of islamic world
 
.
Hi,

Please dont drag us in this shit. Bedouins VS Mullahs. When was the last time you lot people of Saud actually went into war with Jews. As for Mullahs we are well aware of their contra affair !

It had never been about ummah, both of these sick entities are trying to grab power of islamic world

Gypsies (using your language) like yourself were not invited to the party. Mind your own business and do not deny the ground realities which even this forum confirms every single day. You know very well what I referred to. Nor shall you change the curse of this discussion or thread hence why I am forced to ignore any reply of yours which guaranteed will be as moronic as your initial post in this thread.
 
.
Gypsies (using your language) like yourself were not invited to the party. Mind your own business and do not deny the ground realities which even this forum confirms every single day. You know very well what I referred to.
Hi,
Coming very rich from slave of Al SAUD ! Yes the ground reality is both of you across te water have only been fighting for mis placed ego and thats it
 
. .
Me one of the "few"?

The Pakistanis who are either more Arab or Iranian than the Arabs or Iranians themselves. The likes the Pakistani nationalists (who are in majority on PDF) complain about 24/7. I don't know if you are one of those, you have to ask that question to yourself, not me.

In general Pakistanis better focus on something else than Arab-Iranian relations or MENA relations as most are not too well-versed on that front much like most Middle Eastern people are ignorant about Pakistani-Indian relations and South Asian relations. Hence very few of us participate if ever. At least when details are discussed such as in this thread.
 
.
The Pakistanis who are either more Arab or Iranian than the Arabs or Iranians themselves. The likes the Pakistani nationalists (who are in majority on PDF) complain about 24/7. I don't know if you are one of those, you have to ask that question to yourself, not me.

In general Pakistanis better focus on something else than Arab-Iranian relations or MENA relations as most are not too well-versed much like most Middle Eastern people are ignorant about Pakistani-Indian relations. At least when details are discussed.

When you say "fool" that suggests somebody being decieved. What is the deception that you allude to?
 
.
should be clear when reading post 7
Okay Dokey

Middle Eastern people
I don't think this MENA is some Rubik's Cube that "others" can't fathom. Anyway I refuse to look through this "MENA" construct. What the hell is it anyway? Middle East. Middle from what? East from what exactly. Entirely arbitrary. This would be like saying "Middle West" in referance to Austria, Germany, Slovenia, Switzerland and then regarding that as some unique region with a complex beyond the understanding of the rest of the continentals.

For your information Iran is Pakistan's neighbour. My mother tongue is related to the Iranic branch so I can't see how Iran is some mystery from another planet.
 
.
Okay Dokey


I don't think this MENA is some Rubik's Cube that "others" can't fathom. Anyway I refuse to look through this "MENA" construct. What the hell is it anyway? Middle East. Middle from what? East from what exactly. Entirely arbitrary. This would be like saying "Middle West" in referance to Austria, Germany, Slovenia, Switzerland and then regarding as some unique region with a complex beyond the understanding of the rest of the continentals.

For your information Iran is Pakistan's neighbour. My mother tongue is related to the Iranic branch so I can't see how Iran is some mystery from another planet.

Many cannot especially decision makers in the West. Ok, will the Middle East, Near East, Arab world etc. suffice? It's not any different to the notion of South Asia, Southern Europe, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, South East Asia etc. The point should be clear.

Does that somehow make you more familiar with the complex historical relations and regional geopolitics of our region that mostly only locals understand? I highly doubt so.
We have people of Iranian and Turkic origin in the Arab world but that does not mean that they have a good understanding of Central Asian affairs for instance. Similarly the 30-40 million people of Arab descent in Latin American, the 10-5 million in Southeast Asia have little clue about events in the Arab world and Middle East.

Another thing Pakistan only borders the isolated and neglected Baluchistan region of Iran. All of the remaining areas of Iran are more focused on events that take place in the West and look that way. This has always been the case. Iran was greatly influenced by her Semitic speaking neighbors in the West since before Iran even came to exist. Likewise Iranian influences went Westward. It was not a coincidence that they chose ancient Babylon as their capital.

Anyway, I mean no offense by this, but I am not really interested in this discussion. I rather stay on topic if you won't mind.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom