The best Jewish-American-Muslim-Pakistani wedding ever

[Ahmet Pasha]

Hilarious, when u put it that way. That cracked me up. Hehehe

As far as my understanding is those who’ve struggled with dissatisfied spouses and remained with them till the end will have them replaced to something very desirable (applied to both genders). Those who’ve had satisfactory spouses will have them upgraded version level 100 that one look would last long to absorb beauty haha lmao. I’m not sure how accurate this is lmao



I will get a very upgraded version of perfection of him and him of me exceeding level 100

The concept of jannah and hoor al ain etc os there to motivate people not blow themselves up. It has been corrupted by kharijis and anti Islamic propoganda by West/Zionists.

Just like a child needs a reward or motivation after getting good grades. This concept of jannah and hoor al ain works the same way for muslims. There is no set number of hoor al ain one may receive. Allah azzawajal will judge according to the deeds and reward/punish accordingly, blessed and glorified be his name.

 

[FuturePAF]

Fyi: i dont agree with the concept of marriage so i maybe trolling.

Going MGTOW?

 

[ghauri05]

Okay.



I will give the example of India.

Here, there are more than 3 crore ( 30 million ) pending court cases[1], including Supreme Court and lower courts. Many of them have been pending for more than 10 years, many of these cases are land and property disputes, and many of these disputes have even led to murders.

There are not enough judges and courts to keep up with the pending and current cases.

Now if land is made public, under the supervision of the government ( a people's government ), there won't be any ocurrence of disputes between citizens in the first place. Imagine how much freed-up the legal system will be then.

As a side thought, in the USSR, murder was looked upon as a capitalist crime, the reasoning being that there was no need in a communist system for someone to kill another person.

I hope I made sense.



Yes, that is as seen the the Hindutva crooks.

---

[1] https://www.clearias.com/pending-cases-in-indian-courts/

Your logic of making land a public property is flawed..look in this way no matter how much u work hard..u will never be able to have your own home...so the hard work is not translated into reward/facility...As govt. can capture that land any time.
And the logic u gave for disputes is again flawed...today u will make land public..then men will have issues the next thing they have private ownership..so we will need to make it public..and in this way man will never be able to own any thing..no matter how much he works hard

tell that to this guy and he will put a fatwa on you

I agree that many religious leaders have used religion for personal gains..And I also agree that we should read translation of Holy Quran by ourselves. But that still doesn't mean that we don't need a teacher..Just like in any other subject of arts and science we can read books ourselves..why we need to go to educational institutions and to teachers???for proper guidance right.In the same way we need some teacher in religious education too..bcoz the understanding level of every man is different..n it's also possible that one misunderstands an islamic law altogether.
The thing we need to promote is ijtihaad..to discuss the current issues in the light of islam n to find out solutions

 

[IceCold]

So you.saying human can chose anything if its personal so if dad and daughter decide to do marry it will be their personal..
There are some rule set by islam you cant change it just cuz you become animal one day just in the name of personal will dont push this society to the level where no one have limits to do haram things... she did wrong and just accept it.

No I am not. However i cannot neither anyone else can impose their will on others. I already mentioned its wrong from religion POV. Incest marriages are happening in Australia, They are wrong but still happening. Same is here. If someone choses to ignore rules set by religion and follow their own path, its on them, not us.

 

[Crystal-Clear]

not appreciated.

 

[I.R.A]

@I.R.A

Many kinds of private ownership, whether it be of land or water or ideas, lead to conflict. Conflict whether within a family or in society ( someone having three houses when there are homeless people ). Go back to my previous post about there being potentially millions of pending court cases in India because of land and property disputes.

Property held in a commons[1] ( public system ) is the way to resolve that conflict. Our own @Zibago benefits from there being the open source computer operating system called Linux.

Every "communist" and "socialist" countries in history have been living experiments, whether it be USSR or Cuba or Venezuela or the Libyan Jamahiriya. These experiments will evolve over time as more scientific ideas about society come in.

Again you are not being straight forward about the comparison ...... how your modern proposed Socialist system is better than Islam? I hope you are not taking my repeated question as some bait to frame you.

Let me start with refuting the basis of your argument ........... Private ownership is not an Islamic concept, its mainly a capitalist concept ........ Islam in its real essence is a threat to capitalism ...... The Quran has spoken and advised not to accumulate wealth beyond one's own needs ...... Qaroon (Croesus) a wealthy capitalist is one of the enemies of Islam, who has been punished and cursed not by humans but by ALLAH. Now even after all this Islam hasn't taken away the freedom of making their own decisions and freedom of choosing away from humans, while your proposed system somehow tends to be backward by controlling the humans and monitoring them and not letting them think and make free choices. ............

 

[El Sidd]

not allowed just like not allowed with pegans etc.

interesting.....

But Scientology is not Paganism by any definition.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

interesting.....

But Scientology is not Paganism by any definition.

hence the phrase "just like". that "like" is not used for similarity but for refence

 

[El Sidd]

hence the phrase "just like". that "like" is not used for similarity but for refence

hmm ok

but does not really answer the matter at hand though

 

[TheLahoriGuy]

The keyboard muhajids just had a stroke after seeing this post. Now they must condemn the woman to 3 billion years in hell (as if it is their job) because they feel like they need to dictate everyones lives otherwise their feelings will be hurt.

these people wants to implement their own style of islam.. it will be zina till she lives with him. she betrayed islam.. how long she will be happy 60 more years but after death all her non muslim kids will be the reason gunah jariya continue sin.
this is what libral and ultra libral wants in Pakistan.

What I find funnier than your post is the fact that not even your keyboard suggests the correct spellings of "liberal" any more.

 

[24 Hours]

Well as long as they're both adults and happy about it, there's nothing legally wrong with it.

 

[Dalit]

I thought Jews strictly married their own to preserve their lineage? Seems like a Jew gone astray.

Yup not in line with islam but in their personal lives they can decide.

I hope they enjoy their married life. Btw she has said "she was actively seeking not to date pakistani men"

Well she did not want pakistanis guys and mentioning that without any specific reason does make her sound arrogant.

Having said that i will also point out that if pakistani men whether based overseas or in pakistan learn to be a bit more broad minded who would agree to marrying divorcees, widows and women who might have gone past typical 18-19 or early twenties marrige ages then many pakistani women abroad would not have to seek partners in men from other religious
backgrounds and nationalities.

I have really noticed this attitude amongst our guys and their moms , that no matter how old they are, divorced, widowed, even a single parent, or got laid infinte times they would still want an untouched young woman.

I still recall i was once having some general discussion with a guy who is NOT my friend AT ALL, he isnt very successful professionally but he is in STEM field which means in his 40 s and 50s he has chances of becoming successful.
That uncle is a 30 something shortheighted 5 5 guy with avg personality, and most forgettable face .in short nothing special about him except maybe that his father is a well off chap who supported him well. We were discussing marriages and something about looks came up, knowing about his average looks he didnot like something and boastfully said , if my wife will be arrogant about her looks then i will bring multiple wives and younger ones too.
I was like yes bro is boothi pay kon nahi fida ho ga.

Also what is sad and shocking is that people in this thread are mocking this womans weight just cause she married a jew. These peoples issue is that she did an unislamic act by marrying non muslim but at the same time these so called flagbearers of islam have forgotten how strongly islam forbids to mock others appearances and calls its backbiting.

We inherited these norms and values from our Hindu brethren. Pakistanis hold on to many outdated beliefs which frankly have no place in Islam or any civilized culture.

Marrying a divorced woman is in fact encouraged and rewarded in Islam. Just look at the life of the holy prophet and his companions as an example.

 

[Jaanbaz]

Congratulations.

that is nice.
With our current economic condition we need to breed with Jews more.

You never fail to amuse me.

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

The keyboard muhajids just had a stroke after seeing this post. Now they must condemn the woman to 3 billion years in hell (as if it is their job) because they feel like they need to dictate everyones lives otherwise their feelings will be hurt.



What I find funnier than your post is the fact that not even your keyboard suggests the correct spellings of "liberal" any more.

Another one of my favourite hadiths because it teaches us to get up and do something:

On the authority of Abu Sa’eed al-Khudree (may Allah be pleased with him) who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) say, “Whosoever of you sees an evil, let him change it with his hand; and if he is not able to do so, then [let him change it] with his tongue; and if he is not able to do so, then with his heart — and that is the weakest of faith.” [Muslim]
Its not my job only buddy its your job too to stop or condemn haram doing its just a matter of realization. My english is not as good as yours maybe but my point is.

 

[Ocean]

Its said that for women its not allowed to marry non muslims, but for men they can marry jews and chritians but evn here there is a bit of a debate that they cant marry just about any christian or jew woman, it is believed that those women from judaism and christianity are allowed who believe in oneness of God.
But it should be encouarged that both muslim men and women marry within their own group.

I have a cousin who teaches kids at an american school where a lot of pakistani and other ethnicity kids are enrolled, he was sharing that majority of kids studying there, their parents have done interfaith marriages where fathers are pakistanis but mothers are nonmuslim goris etc and kids are very distant from islam.

Anyways, its a marriage thread i dont like turning it into religious one or atleast not the overzealous way some members are going. Plus i would also say that its not just muslim women and non muslim mens marriages that will distance away kids from islam , same results happen even in muslim father and nonmuslim couples.


I think i have heard 70 hoors was for shaheeds, i do believe in following hadees but i think 70 hoors doesnt sound very strong narration , i mean just thinking logically. And then why everything needs to revolve around this topic? If we read quran it mentions everything about beauty of heaven and says its a place beyond ones imagination. The beauty of heaven described consists of so many mentions of greenery and natures beauty. Had it not been for such beautiful descriptions of orcahrds and greenery , lakes and rivers mentioned in quran i honestly would have never learnt to cherish coolness of eyes that nature offers us in this world.Reading those verses taught me to appreciate mountains, lakes ,scenic locales , trees and so much more.

Also iman that is built on lust of women is not truly iman thats something else.

@Imad.Khan bro i noticed i had mistakenly added "do not" after "who" in below sentence from my quoted post ,which entirely changed its meaning.
The correct sentence is this:
"it is believed that those women from judaism and christianity are allowed who believe in oneness of God. "

I ended up writing only those are allowed who "do not" believe in oneness of God,

I have corrected previous post. I am sure you understood my post error but i thought i must clarify myself.

I thought Jews strictly married their own to preserve their lineage? Seems like a Jew gone astray.



We inherited these norms and values from our Hindu brethren. Pakistanis hold on to many outdated beliefs which frankly have no place in Islam or any civilized culture.

Marrying a divorced woman is in fact encouraged and rewarded in Islam. Just look at the life of the holy prophet and his companions as an example.

but it has been long since pakistan has seperated from hindus and if we call oursleves islamic country why we dont follow sunnah of prophet. Then if people refuse to change thinking they should not object to muslim pakistani women marrying non pakistanis and non muslims