Yes thats true.
But lets not give it communal color..
The article says this....
"It is a rule of prudence followed by the security agencies of many countries that no officer belonging to a community, which is aggrieved against the Government, should be deployed as bodyguards of the head of the government.
For many years
in the US,
officers from the Afro-American community were not deployed by the US Secret Service as bodyguards to the President.
Similarly,
Catholic officers from Northern Ireland were not deployed as bodyguards to the British Prime Minister.
Unfortunately, in India, decisions taken in the interest of national security, are sought to be given an unnecessary communal colour, thereby weakening security. The withdrawal of the Sikh officers from close-proximity duties came to the notice of Indira Gandhi. Some say she noticed it herself. Others say one of her close associates noticed it, ascertained from the Delhi Police that this was done on the orders of Kao and brought this to her attention.
She expressed her misgivings over the wisdom of the decision. Following this, the withdrawn Sikh Police officers were posted back to her residence. However, Kao instructed that no Sikh police officer should normally be posted alone in her close proximity and that, whenever a Sikh police officer was posted in her close proximity, he should be accompanied by a non-Sikh officer. "
I agree.
But they failed to provide her security, and it is interesting to note that both the security guards manipulated the schedule so that they were on duty at her residence on the same day. I'm sure this manipulation could have happened without the knowledge of a higher official. JMHO!!!
Everyone wanted IG dead, from US to groups which supported Khalistan.
leave granted...