What's new

Texas police shoot dead two gunmen at Prophet (PBUH) caricature exhibit

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Texas police shoot dead two gunmen at Prophet (PBUH) caricature exhibit
REUTERS
  • 5546f722c0a69.jpg

    Garland police spokesman Joe Harn (C) addresses the media near the Curtis Culwell Center after a shooting outside the exhibit in Garland, Texas, May 3, 2015. - Reuters
    GARLAND: Texas police shot dead two gunmen who opened fire at an exhibit near Dallas of caricatures of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) organised by an anti-Islam group, authorities said on Sunday.

    The shooting echoed past attacks or threats in other Western countries against art depicting the Holy Prophet (PBUH).

    In January, gunmen killed 12 people in the Paris offices of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in revenge for its cartoons.

    Read: Editor among 12 killed in attack on Paris weekly

    Sunday's attack took place shortly before 7 pm in a parking lot of the Curtis Culwell Center, an indoor arena in the suburb of Garland, northeast of Dallas.

    Geert Wilders, a polarising Dutch politician and anti-Islamic campaigner who is on a militant hit list, was among the speakers at the event.

    Police said they had not immediately determined the identity of the two gunmen or whether they were linked to critics of the event who had branded it anti-Islamic.

    “I have no idea who they are, other than they're dead and in the street,” city police spokesman, officer Joe Harn, told Reuters.

    As a precaution, police were examining the suspects' car for any explosives that might be in the vehicle, Harn added.

    The exhibit was organised by Pamela Geller, president of the American Freedom Defence Initiative (AFDI). Her organisation, which is described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a hate group, has sponsored anti-Islamic advertising campaigns in transit systems across the country.

    Organisers said the exhibit was an event to promote freedom of expression.

    Depictions of the Prophet are viewed as offensive in Islam, and Western art depicting Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) has sometimes angered Muslims and provoked threats from radicals.

    Charlie Hebdo, the French magazine attacked in January, had printed cartoons of the Prophet (PBUH).

    In Sunday's incident, the two armed suspects drove up to the front of the building in a car as the event was coming to an end, and began shooting at a security officer, striking him in the leg, police and city officials said.

    Also read: Dutch anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders trial opens

    Garland police officers who were on the scene assisting with security then exchanged fire with the gunmen, and both suspects were shot dead, Harn said.

    The security officer was treated at a local hospital and later released, he said.

    No one else was injured.

    Most of the people attending the event were still inside the arena when the violence unfolded and were unaware of what had occurred until police came into the building and advised everyone to remain indoors because of a shooting.

    “The first suspect was shot immediately. The second suspect was shot and wounded, reached for his back pack. Of course, officers not knowing what was in the backpack shot him again. He was killed,” Garland Mayor Douglas Athas told CNN.
 
. . .
Good job :tup:

Freedom of expression is sacred
Rather they have captured the morons alive so it becomes clear who is hiding behind them.
Know I hope they are incompetent enough to leave traces of the mastermind around .
 
. . . . .
The freedom expression is sacred until your sacred beliefs are ridiculed.

No. Legislature in a modern, secular democracy cannot be based on a book written over 1,000 years ago by some random dudes. You cannot force your religious rules on others just because your book tells you to do so.

You are talking about forbidding people to draw a historical figure that lived over thousand years ago because of some guys interpreted that out of an ancient book.

You are free to practice the religion of your choice, but you cannot tell others what to do.
 
.
No. Legislature in a modern, secular democracy cannot be based on a book written over 1,000 years ago by some random dudes.

Neither can belief that a God was born in certain spot and cow is holy !
 
. . .
Everyone has an equal right to be offended in free societies. Violence is never an acceptable response to being offended.

People have various degrees of tolerance and some act out their frustration and that should not malign a society.
 
.
People have various degrees of tolerance and some act out their frustration and that should not malign a society.
Of course, one should not exhibit the same levels of ignorance that such idiots who respond with violence showcase.

"Acting out frustrations" is not acceptable in any way shape or form. Be offended and outraged but the second you raise your hand to commit violence against a fellow human being you lose your right to be treated as a human being.
 
.
Two ejjits are dead, condemn them for trying to commit acts of violence, also condemn the cartoonists, but violence is never the answer.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom