What's new

Tendulkar's world-record 200

Really? Two words for you - average and strikerate

Performance at home and away
Tendulkar Inzamam
Runs Ave. 100s/50s Runs Ave. 100s/50s
Home 4481 50.35 14/25 2199 57.86 4/14
Away 3401 34.35 7/16 3068 36.52 1/26
Neutral 5533 50.30 16/28 4751 35.19 5/30

Comparing Inzamam and Sachin

Hence proved Inzamam had better average as batsman and as team lead
 
. .
Performance at home and away
Tendulkar Inzamam
Runs Ave. 100s/50s Runs Ave. 100s/50s
Home 4481 50.35 14/25 2199 57.86 4/14
Away 3401 34.35 7/16 3068 36.52 1/26
Neutral 5533 50.30 16/28 4751 35.19 5/30

Comparing Inzamam and Sachin

Hence proved Inzamam had better average as batsman and as team lead


Performance as captain:
M I NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 73 70 5 2454 186* 37.75 6 12 4
Inzamam 34 28 4 1088 123 45.33 2 6 2

Performance as a player:
M I NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 266 260 27 10961 152 47.04 31 57 11
Inzamam 288 271 38 8930 137* 38.32 8 64 16

Performance in 'won' matches:
M I NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 168 165 27 8203 186* 59.44 28 40 5
Inzamam 186 165 36 6353 137* 49.24 7 46 6

Performance in 'lost' matches:
M I NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 152 152 1 4783 146 31.67 8 28 10
Inzamam 125 123 6 3503 123 29.94 3 23 8

this is the data from ur own source...

only inzamam's avg is better than sachin only in captaincy batting...that too with sachin as captain for 73 matches compared to inzamam's 34 matches...he is pathetic in EVERY other aspect..

so that makes him better than sachin...??:argh:

and then what about other data? conveniently forgotten heh???

this shows ur either owefully ignorant or just came here destroy another thread.....:hitwall:
 
.
Inzamam is match winner and clicks in once in 10-20 matches. But not caliber of sachin. like afridi clicking once in every 50 matches.

Sorry no comparison.

See above caparision , :lol:
 
.
Stop it! You guys fight at everything. Let me decide it for you all.

Best Batsmen - Gary Sobers
Best Bowler - Sir Richard Hadlee :flame::flame:
 
.
Matches Innings NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 73 70 5 2454 186* 37.75 6 12 4
Inzamam 34 28 4 1088 123 45.33 2 6 2

Performance as a player:
M I NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 266 260 27 10961 152 47.04 31 57 11
Inzamam 288 271 38 8930 137* 38.32 8 64 16

Performance in 'won' matches:
M I NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 168 165 27 8203 186* 59.44 28 40 5
Inzamam 186 165 36 6353 137* 49.24 7 46 6

Performance in 'lost' matches:
M I NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 152 152 1 4783 146 31.67 8 28 10
Inzamam 125 123 6 3503 123 29.94 3 23 8


The above comparision shows that Sachin is way way better than Inzy...no comparision btwn them:cheers:
 
.
Performance as captain:
M I NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 73 70 5 2454 186* 37.75 6 12 4
Inzamam 34 28 4 1088 123 45.33 2 6 2

Performance as a player:
M I NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 266 260 27 10961 152 47.04 31 57 11
Inzamam 288 271 38 8930 137* 38.32 8 64 16

Performance in 'won' matches:
M I NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 168 165 27 8203 186* 59.44 28 40 5
Inzamam 186 165 36 6353 137* 49.24 7 46 6

Performance in 'lost' matches:
M I NO Runs Hs Ave 100 50 0
Tendulkar 152 152 1 4783 146 31.67 8 28 10
Inzamam 125 123 6 3503 123 29.94 3 23 8

this is the data from ur own source...

only inzamam's avg is better than sachin only in captaincy batting...that too with sachin as captain for 73 matches compared to inzamam's 34 matches...he is pathetic in EVERY other aspect..

so that makes him better than sachin...??:argh:

and then what about other data? conveniently forgotten heh???

this shows ur either owefully ignorant or just came here destroy another thread.....:hitwall:

Pathetic:rofl:

Izemam proved himself better batsman , see my above post with better average ( home 57.8 and away 36.52 )
 
.
Pathetic:rofl:

Izemam proved himself better batsman , see my above post with better average ( home 57.8 and away 36.52 )

and what about total avg....???

and u coveniently didnt post the avg from the nuetral grounds....nice for HIDING the fact....u r just showing the data Inzy is better from sachin..and comforting ur delusional mind....i pity u for ur inferiority complex...

This is the complete data


Tendulkar Inzamam
Runs Ave. 100s/50s Runs Ave. 100s/50s
Home 4481 50.35 14/25 2199 57.86 4/14
Away 3401 34.35 7/16 3068 36.52 1/26
Neutral 5533 50.30 16/28 4751 35.19 5/30



and just because sachin is dear to indians...ur attacking him.....

pathetic behaviour from u...BUT letme tell u one thing..inzy is good player..but he is no where near GOD(Sachin)
 
.
Performance at home and away
Tendulkar Inzamam
Runs Ave. 100s/50s Runs Ave. 100s/50s
Home 4481 50.35 14/25 2199 57.86 4/14
Away 3401 34.35 7/16 3068 36.52 1/26
Neutral 5533 50.30 16/28 4751 35.19 5/30

Comparing Inzamam and Sachin

Hence proved Inzamam had better average as batsman and as team lead

Fundamentalist, you shouldn't let your zealousness blind you. The link you posted was from a 2004 article. Need more upto date data? Check Cricinfo.
 
.
i respect sachin's respect to game and players respect of other team sachin is a only guy in indian team who belleive on fair play
 
. .
you know in reality comparing Inzamam and Sachin is stupid

Both of them are legends no doubt but both of them had their own roles. Inzamam was a middle order batsmen and Sachin is an opener. Inzamam no doubt won us more matches than what Sachin won for India but Sachin has far better average and far more respect around the world and far more centuries comparing to anybody else in the world.

I respect both, both of them has different class........ If Inzamam was an opener or sachin a geniune middle order batsmen we could have compared something here but both of them used to bat at different atmosphere so not easy to compare. Inzamam was better in handling with pressure because he was middle order batsmen and sachin was better in giving a better start to the team in the role of an opener
 
.
Well Sachin Tandulkar ,

Is good player - Inzimam is a special player too ...

I just feel it was unjust for Inzimam to sit out so many games , and the Pakistani team plays 3 test match series

Sachin plays like 20 test matches per year

Inzimam played like 8 test matches -

Of course Sachin will score more runs and averages

But RICKY PONTING is the DA MAN

oH DAMN i won another cup I lost track ... :coffee:
74b2d5b2973548d861900e26e41cfe36.jpg


Perfect technique



3ab327ca631867c1d396a3c242c83a79.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Well Sachin Tandulkar ,

Is good player - Inzimam is a special player too ...

I just feel it was unjust for Inzimam to sit out so many games , and the Pakistani team plays 3 test match series

Sachin plays like 20 test matches per year

Inzimam played like 8 test matches -

Of course Sachin will score more runs and averages

But RICKY PONTING is the DA MAN

oH DAMN i won another cup I lost track ... :coffee:
74b2d5b2973548d861900e26e41cfe36.jpg


Perfect technique



3ab327ca631867c1d396a3c242c83a79.jpg

What about Saeed Anwar ? he was better Batsman technically ?
 
.
you know in reality comparing Inzamam and Sachin is stupid

Both of them are legends no doubt but both of them had their own roles. Inzamam was a middle order batsmen and Sachin is an opener. Inzamam no doubt won us more matches than what Sachin won for India but Sachin has far better average and far more respect around the world and far more centuries comparing to anybody else in the world.

I respect both, both of them has different class........ If Inzamam was an opener or sachin a geniune middle order batsmen we could have compared something here but both of them used to bat at different atmosphere so not easy to compare. Inzamam was better in handling with pressure because he was middle order batsmen and sachin was better in giving a better start to the team in the role of an opener

Sorry to say ,criteria mentioned by you is wrong

Class of batsman determined by his ave. and score under pressure and away.

Sachin is local player fail to perform away and as a captain.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom