Temple remains found while levelling land in Ayodhya

[Brar]

Are you asking seriously?



You are missing the identification.

There are many places in India that are thick with ancient remains only a few feet below the topsoil. So should you subscribe to every local old wives' tale that insists that the Moon came to earth and stood on that spot?




Your statement.

Just saying that it is possible that the mosque was built on an temple and that these remains were found when cunstruction started. Not saying that the temple is the birthplace of ram, not saying that the mosque should have been destroyed in the first place.

 

[Hiptullha]

Reported.

How about you respond to my arguments instead of getting triggered and running to the mods?

 

[xeuss]

No, they should not. I certainly disagree with some of the views of Godse and Savarkar and I will never support those views. But I support some of their other progressive views. Nothing is black and white.

Translation:
"Hitler also had some progressive views"

 

[Moriro]

Mind your language.

Against whom, the one who justify the attacks against muslims and preach their own version of bigoted history in order to spread hatred, what you are observing is a counter narrative produced by the hatred of your own countrymen. We just cannot turn blind eye.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Just saying that it is possible that the mosque was built on an temple and that these remains were found when cunstruction started. Not saying that the temple is the birthplace of ram, not saying that the mosque should have been destroyed in the first place.

I have no problem with that. Did I object? Only you should be careful about saying that the mosque was built on a temple; how do you know? Where were the remains found? Were they under the foundations of the mosque? Were they at a distance?

Accepting these very broad generalisations, which are false, on examining the detail, helps the Hindutvavadi in making his case.

 

[Brar]

No, Indian Hindus must emulate goons like Yogi "Rape buried corpses" Adityanath while Indian Muslims must emulate cucks like APJ Kalam. If you disagree with this, you're a regressive antinational.

Thanks for YOUR opinion

 

[Naofumi]

Translation:
"Hitler also had some progressive views"

Yup, even Hitler banned Human zoos, turn around humiliating treaties but don't we pick a side here? @TheGreatMaratha

 

[TheGreatMaratha]

Brother, even Osama can be said to be against American imperialism, we have to draw lines somewhere and in that line either Osama is on our side or he's not, no matter how many "truths" he have spoken. Casteism doesn't need a Savarkar when we had an Ambedkar.

Savarkar/Godse didn't do bomb blasts. I always find it funny when these kind of extreme comparisons are made. In another thread or maybe this one, RSS was being compared to Taliban. Just to let you know, I'm a big fan of Ambedkar as well. We have serials on him as well.

 

[Soumitra]

Only Kalam? Maybe you should've asked about more.

Why? Isn't Dr. Kalam the most famous Muslim Nationalist?

Can you name other famous Muslim Nationalists?

 

[Joe Shearer]

Against whom, the one who justify the attacks against muslims and preach their own version of bigoted history in order to spread hatred, what you are observing is a counter narrative produced by the hatred of your own countrymen. We just cannot turn blind eye.

Nobody is asking you to turn a blind eye. Do not use insults to make your point. That is not counter-narrative, that is gutter behaviour. So watch it.

 

[Hiptullha]

Thanks for YOUR opinion

Not an opinion. Fact.

 

[Joe Shearer]

How about you respond to my arguments instead of getting triggered and running to the mods?

How about you couching your arguments in decent language?

 

[TheGreatMaratha]

Yup, even Hitler banned Human zoos

Were there human zoos? If yes, Hitler should definitely be credited for banning them that but criticized for the treatment of Jews.

 

[MayaBazar]

No means No Maya

 

[Lt General]

its a collection of princely capitalist states with the agenda of maximum exploitation of the masses through divide and conquer.

Only to get plundered by the outsiders in the end. Pakistan forms a natural defense boundary to stop more plundering by the outside invaders, and arrogant Indians don't want to face this fact.

At a point they did realize that when India actually fully supported Pakistan when Pakistan was helping Talibans of Afghanistan to fight USSR invasion because India knew if USSR cross over to Pakistan, its next target would be India.

Pakistan permanently forms a natural line of defense for India against the invaders, and has only allowed an iota of terrorism flow into the Indian society, which otherwise would have plagued the entire India. Millions of every generation dying due to any calamity was a norm before partition.