Sage
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
- Messages
- 2,373
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Nana looks in misery like LCA ...not emotional
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nana looks in misery like LCA ...not emotional
Martyr of truth.
Its not your fault you don't understand things , Since you don't know how to make a plane , you don't understand. 13,000 Cr is for all the technologies / infrastructure develop for making the plane. once technology developed then these can be used for different plane also.World's cheapest 4th generation program, only just a little more expensive then the JAs-39 Gripen ..
Tejas LCA project to cost more than Rs 13,000 crore over 35 years - timesofindia-economictimes
Its tell how the plane is safe unlike your JF-17 which was crashed during bombing mission then was stopped flying by PAF since then in bombing fear of getting crashed.Ah yes, test sorties, please also mention the infamous " rides the truck" tests -- as far as the crashes go, lets not go there with the IAF being so safe, from the Mig-21's all the way to the MKI -- I suppose thats why we have the "ride the truck" tests for LCA, cuz a crash might send jolts up the already fragile project on a ventilator of excessive dollars ...
and how long does it take to "bake the cake" --- 3 decades ??? -- "Do you get it" ?
ofcourse the almighty indigenous LCA, with inputs from Sweden, US, Russia, Israel and Uk -- oh how can we get such an indigenous weapon system -- man we're so jealous of the "indigenous capability" of India, which makes it the world's biggest importer of arms ---
Do it for the sake of your own people ...!
i sometimes get realli very confused about pakistanies making fun of indian made wepons specially LCAIts not your fault you don't understand things , Since you don't know how to make a plane , you don't understand. 13,000 Cr is for all the technologies / infrastructure develop for making the plane. once technology developed then these can be used for different plane also.
Some include paid media saying wrong facts you people go ga ga on that , all development included engines, OBOG/ radar development etc .... which mean now any more plane built on that will be very cheap.
Its tell how the plane is safe unlike your JF-17 which was crashed during bombing mission then was stopped flying by PAF since then in bombing fear of getting crashed.
Cake is baking , unlike yours which induced it cant fly in night etc. IAF take fully grown mature plane and not like PAF.
lol when your JF-17 become china -PAK JV project with Russian engines and one point of time JF-17 also looking for Italian / French system ( off course ) they denied to PAK.
Nana looks in misery like LCA ...not emotional
Its not your fault you don't understand things , Since you don't know how to make a plane , you don't understand. 13,000 Cr is for all the technologies / infrastructure develop for making the plane. once technology developed then these can be used for different plane also.
Some include paid media saying wrong facts you people go ga ga on that , all development included engines, OBOG/ radar development etc .... which mean now any more plane built on that will be very cheap.
Its tell how the plane is safe unlike your JF-17 which was crashed during bombing mission then was stopped flying by PAF since then in bombing fear of getting crashed.
"baking" -- also add for the last 3 decades and your statement would seem legit concerning the LCA ..Cake is baking , unlike yours which induced it cant fly in night etc. IAF take fully grown mature plane and not like PAF.
unlike you, we dont have a fetish of "made in our country" -- we know our limitations and our way around them so thanks for pointing out the things we already know ..lol when your JF-17 become china -PAK JV project with Russian engines and one point of time JF-17 also looking for Italian / French system ( off course ) they denied to PAK.
i sometimes get realli very confused about pakistanies making fun of indian made wepons specially LCA
as they are from a nation who had 4 wars with us and is bleeding from countless self imposed wounds which incedentlli it wanted for us in order to bleed india dry thru 1000 cuts policy
cause logically pakistanies should keep quite and never point owt any faults in LCA programme but they are doing opposite !!!!!
what is this attitude ?
View attachment 236213
Let take a example ,Engine developed for LCA now used in Ships and will also be used UVA, so the project cost of Ships and UVA Engine came down to NIL , because technology developed on LCH will used in those also. So if we spend huge on one project , in other project we got it NIL investment.Just in case you dont know "project cost" also happens to be a primal factor in dictating, the per unit cost of a product -- as you so "eloquently" put "Its not your fault you don't understand things" -- ofcourse we dont know how to make a plane, only the alien technology manufacture DRDO knows -- how to import from sweds,Israel, Russia, UK and US and go -- look at this, its "Made in India" --
Well those who ride will falls , In India every time 5 planes was on the sky. Don't know how much PAK can fly planes, last time I head JF-17 was barred from bombing action after it got crashed.Like I said, the word "safe" coming from a country that has amongst the worlds worst crash records is interesting to say the least...
After 3 Decades ....we will reach somewhere , like today our space program reached mars , and you still struggling to make your first SATS."baking" -- also add for the last 3 decades and your statement would seem legit concerning the LCA ..
unlike you, we dont have a fetish of "made in our country" -- we know our limitations and our way around them so thanks for pointing out the things we already know ..
Let take a example ,Engine developed for LCA now used in Ships and will also be used UVA, so the project cost of Ships and UVA Engine came down to NIL , because technology developed on LCH will used in those also. So if we spend huge on one project , in other project we got it NIL investment.
You need lot of learn about business, that's why no Business house grown in PAK , you need to learn lot of business and "project cost " and how it is distributed among multiple projects.
what a great quote, those who ride will fall, I suppose thats the motto of the airforce whose backbone has earned the nickname of "flying coffins" --Well those who ride will falls , In India every time 5 planes was on the sky. Don't know how much PAK can fly planes, last time I head JF-17 was barred from bombing action after it got crashed.
After 3 Decades ....we will reach somewhere , like today our space program reached mars , and you still struggling to make your first SATS.
All of you haven't understand what author is trying to say? HE want to say Pump more money in R&D and work of 2 different design / parameters and then select the one which find you best .
Like F-22 and JSF both developed simultaneously. like that Tejas with different engines should be developed at same time and also for 5th gen develop one with present engine technology/ Russian and other with be so called more powerful engine which can be develop successfully in future but not sure.
In short develop 2 types and select best out of that.
Our design and our learning , the same thing was said by someone like you when India building first rocket / Sats and Ships also..... and look where are we now.
in future we develop wide Varity of planes just choppers. Its just a learning curve and will pass away.
Our money, our time, our plane,........ Why are you getting bothered... Have a nice bowl of Haleem and enjoy the month.....
True. It's in the best interest of Pakistan that India focus on Tejas...and Tejas only.
Hi,All of you haven't understand what author is trying to say? HE want to say Pump more money in R&D and work of 2 different design / parameters and then select the one which find you best .
Like F-22 and JSF both developed simultaneously. like that Tejas with different engines should be developed at same time and also for 5th gen develop one with present engine technology/ Russian and other with be so called more powerful engine which can be develop successfully in future but not sure.
In short develop 2 types and select best out of that.
Our design and our learning , the same thing was said by someone like you when India building first rocket / Sats and Ships also..... and look where are we now.
in future we develop wide Varity of planes just choppers. Its just a learning curve and will pass away.