As regards to Aurangzeb, we all know that the Mughal dynasty reached its zenith during his regime. India was the richest kingdom during his time. Killing a brother to get to the throne was a norm those days. Ashoka did it and Mahabharata called it dharma. Despite being the richest king of his time he lived like a fakir and earned his bread by writing Quranic verses and stitching skull caps. He was a devout muslim and implemented sharia law. His imposition of Jizya on non muslims was in accordance with the sharia laws and his fight against Sikhs and Shivaji was a political battle. If Modi can be a hero for some then even Aurangzeb can be a hero for some. Its not necessary a hero has to be politically perfect, No human is perfect otherwise also. So the idiots representing muslims on TV channels and claiming Aurangzeb to be their hero could not defend him gracefully and went on back foot and became aggressive. I have seen hindus debating about their Lord Ram if he was a perfect personality or not for what he did to his wife Sita. But we dont want a critical debate as to why we consider Aurangzeb a hero.