I agree with
@HeinzG to some extent, a protracted conflict ends up costing more lives in the long run.
Sometimes you just have to go in and end it, once and for all.
I will give Rajapaksa credit for that. I am saying this as a Tamil (from India).
Similar to Churchill, he was a good war president for SL. Similar to Churchill he also had some popularity after the war....but lost crucial elections because people don't like the domestic side of his rule for whatever reason. Rajapaksa family became too corrupt (like outrightly), he made too many political enemies, angered too many common folk as well and we have the inevitable result because of that.
I for one wish TNA would put up a leader that is not separatist. With the prevailing mood of jointly taking the country forward and reconciliation etc...it bodes badly for the stability I think...all it needs is one political flare up somewhere.
I mean there are active separatists in parliament here in Canada, who have had links to the terrorist days of the free quebec movement...and still actively say they want Quebec to be free (similar to SNP in Britain)....but I personally feel TNA can be playing this situation better given the terrible civil war was not so long ago and is still fresh in peoples heads.
But then again we have the argument that for them to have legitimacy, all views must be heard so that the most meaningful compromises can be made for SL to remain united and move forward in all fronts.