What's new

Taliban blow up boys school in NW Pakistan

Status
Not open for further replies.
What 8 years of security? 9/11 was not even a security failure, so it was a false flag attack to get into Afghanistan. One thing governments can rely on is people to believe what they want them to believe. In other words, utterly stupid. 9/11 was a clear case of an inside job. They knew within 24 hours who was involved. They found passports in the rubble. Pentagon had no plane wreckage except a solitary piece of small wreckage which could easily have been planted as evidence by a person. The heat was suppose to weaken the base yet it fell from the top. And the way it fell, it's obvious it's a planned demolition. There are noises and pictures of small bombs going off inside. Yet people believe it anyway because GoA said so. Like I said, if governments can expect one thing, it's for the people to be utterly stupid and not see the obvious.

i would like to say many on this regard but for now i am running out of patience for typin

there are many conspiracy theory for 9/11 and also each conspiracy debunked

and hence nobody has been able to proove it was inside job

but i still prefer to believe the scientist and architects simulations tat proove how it fell
 
.
None have been debunked. At least not the more serious ones. The popularmechanics page that everyone uses contains contradictions and unreasonable explanations for many things. Pentagon one and the lack of why the planes were not intercepted were one of them.
 
Last edited:
.
i would like to say many on this regard but for now i am running out of patience for typin

there are many conspiracy theory for 9/11 and also each conspiracy debunked

and hence nobody has been able to proove it was inside job

but i still prefer to believe the scientist and architects simulations tat proove how it fell

This is how accidental buildings crash ....


Now here is how a perfectly executed building is demolished by internal bombs



Say hellow to THERMITE

Facts

a)Both towers were specifically insured for terrorist attacks for up to 2 billion dollars
each , the towers were just purched by Jewish owner for fraction of that amount
b)Enron scandle files were kept and saved in near by buildings and all data that
pin pointed Big people involved in enron scandal

Towers had Mesh - Architecture , which guarentees that even if 10-30% floor is gone the remaining desig and structure holds the whole structure together also it was further protected with a solid beam in center core , which would have not just melted with mere fire heat which was already extinguished (clinically proven to not go beyond certain levels)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Right, if you notice, they always fall from top to down, just like WTC. Moreover, there were videos and eye witness reports of small bombs going off inside WTC! When it's that obvious, and yet people still believe in the government, it really makes one question humanity's intelligence.
 
.
.
Those are really desperate and sad attempts to counter it. I mean look what they are calling engines, pieces of plane, debris from plane, etc. That small solitary piece of steel is enough evidence of a plane? Bollocks. No wings, not serious signs of engines, etc. Just small pieces of metal.

Where did the plane go? It was a god damn covert operation. They could have crashed it in the sea or in middle in a desert for all we know. They knew that it was too hard to crash into that building, that's why they used missile there.
 
.
Popular Science and Mechanics have been a propaganda rag for ages now. The scrap of colored metal they claim as undeniable proof that a passenger jet hit the pentagon is small enough to be moved around by a single person. Not to mention the fact that it's the only piece of wreckage that looks like it came from a plane. Planes don't simply disappear when they crash.

They claim they found the black box, yet have never released the data to the public. They confiscated the camera data of every single camera in the surrounding area, and to this date, and only released three frames of animation from ONE of them, and neither of those frames show a plane. Interestingly enough, the three frames they released had been leaked years earlier. If they actually wanted to settle this debate once and for all, they'd simply release all the camera data. If you have nothing to hide, you have reason to hide nothing.
 
.
And we have people who only supposedly knew how to fly paper airplanes who managed to complete a series of complicated maneuvers and precisely guide the aircraft into its target at a perfect angle at such a low alttitude.
 
.
tats the funniest thing i have ever heard

yes india trained them tey also send them through kashmir
now second part tey captured fata,nwf and etc

now telll me where was pakistan army and intelligence in this so called happening by ur logic

Kashmir is mountain region , so to monitor Kashmir boarder is impossible.
 
.
guys.. the topic is " Taliban Blow up boys school" Not "whether 9/11 was a false flag"

Ahsan.. dude.. put up some credible evidence or let it go.. Just suppositions do not make a good debate. want to avoid using harsh words as that will result into a flame war, but in a debate, you simply cant say that your proof is internal ISI/Army sources that you cant disclose..If you are accusing my country explain how India is able to do this and provide credible links to back it up. Else keep the discussion for the time when you can...
 
.
It's not my problem if you don't believe it. I have always said I couldn't care less if indians believe their country is involved in terrorism or not. Proof has been provided to respective states - it is normally not released to public until states agree about that. Even Musharraf has said india is supporting terrorism and said there is proof for that which has been provided to respective states. I belive you already know about this one so it's pointless providing links for this. Just do a google search. He even said this when he came to india in summer 2009. Whether or not there are online links does not disprove it (or prove it). Not everything is so simple and black and white. Online links do not make something an empirical fact, or myth. It's not supposition, it's a known fact for those who are inside the government and army.

india is the biggest terrorist state in this world and if there are any intelligence agenices who are only good at supporting terrorists, it's RAW.

And how many indians I see this from? you cannot say such and such about my country, but I and my countrymen can say whatever they want about your country.
 
Last edited:
.
Right, if you notice, they always fall from top to down, just like WTC. Moreover, there were videos and eye witness reports of small bombs going off inside WTC! When it's that obvious, and yet people still believe in the government, it really makes one question humanity's intelligence.

If it is inside job of usa, why al qaeda/OBL issuing video messages regularly. Taliban hosting OBL is not fake. Pakistan supporting taliban is not fake.
You are a reasonable person. Please don't compete with Zaid Hamid? I believe no one can beat him.
 
.
If it is inside job of usa, why al qaeda/OBL issuing video messages regularly. Taliban hosting OBL is not fake. Pakistan supporting taliban is not fake.
You are a reasonable person. Please don't compete with Zaid Hamid? I believe no one can beat him.

Video messages are fake. They are done routinely for American public consumption. OBL used his wrong hand in the video.

Yes, Taliban hosting OBL or Pakistan supporting Afghan Taliban is not fake. What relevence does that have?
 
.
Video messages are fake. They are done routinely for American public consumption. OBL used his wrong hand in the video.

Yes, Taliban hosting OBL or Pakistan supporting Afghan Taliban is not fake. What relevence does that have?

OBL never denied of doing 9/11. Before US attacked Afghanistan, US demanded for OBL to be handed over but taliban rejected.

If OBL is not responsible for 9/11 then taliban could have handed over to USA.
 
.
It's not my problem if you don't believe it. I have always said I couldn't care less if indians believe their country is involved in terrorism or not. Proof has been provided to respective states - it is normally not released to public until states agree about that.
Utter nonsense.. There is no acknowledgement of proof being received by any state..

Even Musharraf has said india is supporting terrorism and said there is proof for that which has been provided to respective states. I belive you already know about this one so it's pointless providing links for this.
Musharraf is accused of being a criminal in your country. His words carry zero credibility

Just do a google search. He even said this when he came to india in summer 2009. Whether or not there are online links does not disprove it (or prove it). Not everything is so simple and black and white. Online links do not make something an empirical fact, or myth. It's not supposition, it's a known fact for those who are inside the government and army.
here we go again on inside govt and army.. See my post on inside sources in RAW

india is the biggest terrorist state in this world and if there are any intelligence agenices who are only good at supporting terrorists, it's RAW.
:blah::blah:

And how many indians I see this from? you cannot say such and such about my country, but I and my countrymen can say whatever they want about your country.
Say what you want to.. but back it up with something more than imaginary sources in Army and ISI :rofl:
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom