Here's the actual truth-- CAA doesn't affect the citizenship status of the existing Indian citizens across religions in any way whatsoever. Only the naturalization period for those religious minorities facing persecution(proof of discrimination still have to be furnished) in neighbouring muslim countries have been reduced by 5 years. In any case, India has already been accepting a steady exodus of religious refugees from Pakistan and Bangladesh since their inception. CAA changes none of it.
Since the details of nation wide NRC are not yet out, lenme speak about the Assam NRC. It was a Supreme Court mandated process to find out the illegal aliens living in India with false documents. Our executive in Assam had no role in the preparation of the draft and final NRC.
NRC wasn't targetted at any one religion, infact there was no column for religious denomination in the NRC form, only the ancestral legacy data were collected and verified. The religious composition of those excluded is also not out on public domain. So, where from did you arrive at this preposterous conclusion that CAA/NRC are against any particular group. The two are unrelated and doesn't affect the rights of an Indian citizen in any way.
There goes your baseless claims for a toss..
Tsk Tsk. The CAA/NRC debacle very much discriminates against Muslims or miahs as you call them. Illegal Muslims are now a level below illegal Hindus, and you saying otherwise isn't going to change that. You must think folks were born yesterday to believe otherwise.
Regarding Muslim citizens vs non-Muslim citizens, their discrimination and devaluation arises from actual government and security forces behaviour towards them, and specifically how it is different for the two groups.
Muslims will run the risk of the following for simply protesting or even when not protesting, as has been done and documented in Kashmir and/or UP:
Summary detention and rendition to non-local jails without any charge and for an indefinite period, collective punishment against family members and householders of those suspected of protesting, forced payment of "damage/ security bonds" by Muslim community leaders for simple guilt by association of an unproven "crime", torture by police and RSS militias, harassment by police and militia simply for protesting, threats to life and career and livelihoods for protesting, actual harm to livelihoods and careers simply for protesting exemplified by masked thuggery in universities/open thuggery by police/blacklisting of individuals and aforementioned public bond payment, collusion between uniformed security and masked militias to intimidate and actually harm Muslim protesters, pellet gun injuries, torture and death by shooting in the head and back. Non-Muslim protesters have far less (if not zero) risk of the above abuses occurring against them.
Now these differences in treatment pertain only to The protests and their fallout. In general in Hindustan, Muslim rights have been compromised relative to those of non-Muslims. I don't need to wax lyrical about the lynchings, beef lynchings, jayshreeram mobs, aggressive take over of Islamic mosques, renaming of Mughal era places and sites, targeted rewriting of history curricula, propagandised films and media productions favouring a Hindutva narrative while demonizing Muslim historical figures.
The list goes on.
The take home points: an illegal Muslim is not wanted in India while an illegal non-muslim is; an established Muslim citizen is less favoured than an established non-muslim citizen.
That really is all there is to it and the evidence backs this up.
So keep howling "secular nation" until the cows come home. Nobody is falling for it any more.