What's new

Taiwanese brawl in parliament

Where was the security? Why are they fighting?
 
.
Bro, seriously, your English! China is not democracy nor Communist, we are a proud Capitalist Authoritarian State with mixed economic ownership, no different from WWII Japan/Germany. Closer to Nazis than Communists actually.

Yes, we gun down opposition but we created the worlds second largest economy. we feed our people, we don't starve them Indian style.
tell that to your singapore (or false flag) friend who claims otherwise. He is the one who started comparison of democracy.
 
.
no smarty I dint say that your chinese compatriot said that theirs is the best democracy. :lol:
Now put a board in tianemen square about being the best democracy your friend from singapore ( or from china ) will help you.


oh yeah , showing you the mirror about your autocrats is eating my own words, then good luck with your fake democracy.

Npope.

The mainstay of your dialogue here is 'You Cheenis do not undnerstand democracy'

You are associating race with a form of political governance.

So i requested that you say so- yet u kept evading this, despite making that statement.

Thus, you've just eaten your own words.






*PS BTW, the Taiwanese in the video are 'Cheenis' too. Thus your statement is refuted once again.

Now go suck your thumb
 
.
Npope.

The mainstay of your dialogue here is 'You Cheenis do not undnerstand democracy'

You are associating race with a form of political governance.

So i requested that you say so- yet u kept evading this, despite making that statement.

Thus, you've just eaten your own words.






*PS BTW, the Taiwanese in the video are 'Cheenis' too
chinese is not a race its an ethnicity got it. you lost the argument calling your authoritarian govt better than taiwanese democracy. so stop crying.
 
.
hahahah Im singaporean born n bred.

I posted the video as it is- that's the reality Taiwanese democracy.

You were the one that started bitching with your own rhetoric that 'Cheenis do not understand democracy'
blahabhalhabhlahbha :blah:
heres your wonder ful insightful quote which calls authoritarian singapore a democracy :sarcastic:
Yes we are a democracy- not chaoticracy like India or Taiwan.

 
.
blahabhalhabhlahbha :blah:
heres your wonder ful insightful quote which calls authoritarian singapore a democracy :sarcastic:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracy_in_Singapore

Singapore has a multi-party parliamentary system of representative democracy in which the President of Singapore is the head of state and the Prime Minister of Singapore is the head of government. Executive power is vested in the President and the Cabinet. Cabinet has the general direction and control of the government and is collectively responsible to the Parliament. There are three separate branches of government: the legislature, executive and judiciary.

Representative democracy began in the 1940s when the number of elected seats in the legislature gradually increased, until a fully elected Legislative Assembly of Singaporewas established in 1958. At present, Singapore legislation establishes various mechanisms that fulfil the doctrine of representative democracy. Parliamentary elections in Singapore are required to be held regularly to elect the Parliament through universal suffrage. Although the right to vote in Singapore law is not expressly mentioned in the Constitution, the Government has affirmed that the right may be implied into the constitutional text.

The Constitution vests the three branches of the state with different aspects of governmental power. The executive is made up of the President and the Cabinet, which is headed by the Prime Minister. The Cabinet is accountable to the electorate and is an embodiment of representative democracy. The President is elected by the people to act as a constitutional safeguard in protecting the national reserves and preserving the integrity of the public service. To qualify as a presidential candidate, stringent criteria must be satisfied.

The Constitution further provides for the composition of a parliament which encompasses members of parliament (MPs) elected through Single Member Constituencies and Group Representation Constituencies, Non-constituency Members of Parliament (NCMPs) and Nominated Members of Parliament (NMPs). MPs are representatives of the electorate and have the role of raising concerns that the people may have. The Government's view is that representative democracy is better understood as regarding political parties rather than individual MPs as the fundamental element in the political system. While the judiciary is not a direct manifestation of the concept of representative democracy, it serves as a check on the Government and the legislature by ensuring that their powers are exercised within the limits established by the Constitution, such as the fundamental liberties in Part IV.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracy






Singapore is not a democracy according to you.

I repeat:

What has https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_categorization) got to do with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy ?

If u still cannot answer this- i take it that you're only a racist troll who is ignorant to the core- time to get out of your well and see how big the world really is:

fb06b0_2cf76044fc804b3384d7305c38387fce.jpg
 
Last edited:
. .
Where was the security? Why are they fighting?

They were fighting due to disagreements in regards to 'an infrastructure project'

So when disagreements cannot be settled via political debates to reach an agreement; they settle them with their fists- in parliament.

Thats Taiwanese-style democracy for you. In the Sinosphere, the Taiwanese parliament is often mocked at for being an extremely 'throw face' affair.

Hahahaha.
 
Last edited:
.
:lol:
1. Chinese teaching Indians democracy
2. Singaporean guy living in a bogus democracy mocking Taiwanese.

Well, fights happen in most of the parliament, they are humans with emotions and feelings. So, when they couldn't control it or becomes fight. That's why there is security guards in Parliaments in order to avoid such incidents. But when it comes to ministers or high ranking persona, they might find it difficult. Also, I assume guards act on the order of speaker of the house.
 
.
Get fuking out. When the Indian can understand democracy, pigs can fly.
First of all, democracy is based on equality.
Exactly. Indian democracy is a quasi- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hereditary_monarchy in disguise in fiscal function.

Ministers r appointed and executive positions are filled via hereditary relations(highly influenced by the Bharatiya Caste system) not based on merit or capability, but the amount of votes you can buy or extort.

Highly-connected and influential individuals aka modern day Rajas in every indian state often secure positions for himself and his interpersonal relations.

The social, economic and technological backwardness of the Indian nation we see today is an evidence of the byproduct of this system.

Imcompetent individuals are 'elected' into power that ultimately reflects the subpar performance of his/her ministry/organization/department.
 
Last edited:
. .
:lol:
1. Chinese teaching Indians democracy
2. Singaporean guy living in a bogus democracy mocking Taiwanese.

Well, fights happen in most of the parliament, they are humans with emotions and feelings. So, when they couldn't control it or becomes fight. That's why there is security guards in Parliaments in order to avoid such incidents. But when it comes to ministers or high ranking persona, they might find it difficult. Also, I assume guards act on the order of speaker of the house.
There u go another 1.

Then my question to u is:

What has race got to do with democracy? If u cant ans this, u might now go suck your thumb.

Im a chinese living in a largely-chinese country filled with mostly chinese ministers staffed with a mostly-chinese cabinet with a chinese prime minister and a chinese president in a system of constitutionalised Representative Democracy- does that give me the right to 'teach indians democracy' now?

If u follow your point, then your nation's democracy is as bogus as mine hahahaha.

And no- fights in parliament DONT occur in all democracies- at least not Singapore's. Please dont impose your opinion that the Bharatiya chaoticratic form of democracy ( chaotic lok sabha, raja sabha sessions lolololol) as a benchmark for all democracies.
 
Last edited:
.
What has race got to do with democracy?
:o: Did I talk about race? And mind your words kiddo.
Im a chinese
You are a singaporean of Chinese origin. Your first country is Singapore, not China.
-chinese country filled with mostly chinese ministers staffed with a mostly-chinese cabinet with a chinese prime minister and a chinese president in a system of constitutionalised Representative Democracy- does that give me the right to 'teach indians democracy' now?
But that country is called Singapore not China.:cheesy:
 
.
:o: Did I talk about race? And mind your words kiddo.

You are a singaporean of Chinese origin. Your first country is Singapore, not China.

But that country is called Singapore not China.:cheesy:
Explain:

'Chinese teaching Indians democracy'

If u cant, u r associating race with democracy n is thus, insinuating that chinese do not understand democracy which is pseudo-oxymoronic considering i live in a ethnically-chinese democracy- just like the Taiwanese.
 
Last edited:
.
This is what happens when u have unrestricted democracy:


Flying chairs, shoves and water splashing. This is Taiwanese Politician 'Pai kia'(Hokkien for hooligan) for you
Western electorial democracy have reached it's level of incompetence.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom