What's new

Taiwan defies China with WWII military parade

Of course he does,
What are you hinting to him? why do I call him traitor? Even I feel some differences between him and me about the role of the KMT in the war, but that is just a common argue about a Chinese political party between two Chinese. Even i disagree with him, it is just our internal affair. He never appeared any pro-foreigner mind, why did I call him traitor? And how open-minded and rational you are, why did you hint it to him? You accused others of interfere in the relation between you and some Chinese members, but what did you just do to me.
in fact he and others like him @Keel @Economic superpower and many others (i will not name them as they are quite fair, but these two need to be addressed openly) often even begrudge my positive relationship and rapport with some of the Chinese member posters in this forum. Heck, even by associating with me or having a positive rapport with me --- they automatically associate them as a "Japanese Worshipper" or "Traitor", can you even imagine such a closed minded, and bigoted thinking process? Such unwarranted malicious and insipidness.
I joined in this forum in last September, and I left months when I logged in only several times, I only replied in recent weeks. I have known nothing about the relations between you and the other members on this forum. I only represented my viewpoint about the any issues,of which I have some knowleges, quoted on this China & Far East sector. Even though I am too frank and too sarcastic, but I am never bigoted to others' own affairs, I am never nozy to care about the relations of other people. If you thought of me as other Chinese members you accused above, I must say you just misunderstand me. If you got that from the comment I reply to @scherz, i remind you that I was just bashing him like what i did to any KMT fans on Chinese forum, and I was not aiming at the interaction between you, and the relation between you and him. If i once bashed you, that is because I disagree with you very much. If the statement you dislike, I can edit it on that comment.
I always like to keep an open mind, and despite differences in positions, I like to see (and I like to BELIEVE) that it is possible to find common ground and even develop friendships with some of our Chinese members in here without having the nationalism or patriotism put a damper on mutually inclusive areas of interest.
Frankly, I had admired your erudite, open-mind and your patience, and once i had perused many articles you posted. I once consented many viewpoints about the relation between China and Japan. But what is wrong with you in last several months, you are becoming more and more sentimental about the relation between China and Japan and you always tried to confuse others, which didnt appear directly in the thread of China or Japan, rather than in the thread about Japan-Vietnam, Japan-Pinoy or SCS, China-Japan war etc. I sharply felt you have two faces, that is why I changed the attitude to you. My first comment after my long leave is in your thread(a thread about the integration of East Asia) to bash you, when I felt sharply you were different from the past:disagree:.

No i disagree, anybody that says something tht isnt to the liking of some ultra nationalistic chinese members here is a foreign devil and any Chinese who dares agree with a japanese (of all people)on any subject about China is a traitor to the nation. :china::coffee:
I think your anglo-saxon people always like to mess up the relations of others, just like, in 2012, US instigated Shintaro Ishihara to launch the so-called "Nationalization of the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands" to break the process of the trilateral negotiation about China Japan ROK FTA. You are the most evil nation.:disagree:
 
Last edited:
.
What do you hint to him? why do I call him traitor? Even I feel some differences between him and me about the role of the KMT in the war, but that is just a common argue about a Chinese political party between two Chinese. Even i disagree with him, it is just our internal affair. He never appear any pro-foreigner mind, why did I call him traitor? And how open-minded and rational you are, why do you hint it to him? You accuse others of interfere in the relation between you and some Chinese members, but what did you just do to me.

I joined in this forum in last September, and I left months when I logged in only several times, I only replied in recent weeks. I have known nothing about the relations between you and the other members on this forum. I only represent my viewpoint about the any issues quoted,of which I have some knowleges, on this China & Far East sector. Even though I am too frank and too sarcastic, but I am never bigoted to others' own affairs, I am never nozy to care about the relations of other people. If you thought of me as other Chinese members you accused above, I must say you just misunderstand me. If you got that from the comment I reply to @scherz, i remind you that I was just bashing him like what i did to any KMT fans on Chinese forum, and I was not aiming at the interaction between you, and the relation between you and him. If i once bashed you, that is because I disagree with you very much. If the statement you dislike, I can edit it on that comment.

Frankly, I had admired your erudite, open-mind and your patience, and once i had perused many articles you posted. I once consented many viewpoints about the relation between China and Japan. But what wrong with you in last several months, you were becoming more and more sentimental about the relation between China and Japan and you always tried to confuse others, which didnt appear directly in the thread of China or Japan, rather than in the thread about Japan-Vietnam, Japan-Pinoy or SCS, China-Japan war etc. I sharply felt you have two faces, that is why I changed the attitude to you. My first comment after my long leave is in your thread(a thread about the integration of East Asia) to bash you, when I felt sharply you were different from the past:disagree:.


I think your anglo-saxon people always like to mess up the relations of others, just like, in 2012, US instigated Shintaro Ishihara to launch the so-called "Nationalization of the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands" to break the process of the negotiation about China Japan ROK FTA. You are the most evil nation.:disagree:


You have repeatedly called my people as "Japs" time and time again when you know that is a racial slur. Have I ever once called or referred to Chinese people in racial terms or even uttered a racist word on the people of China? Never.

Because there is no room for such diatribe in proper discourse. As for me being "sentimental", I can guarantee it was because I was forced to defend my nation and people after some insults were hurled at me or on my people by some trolls .

I don't come here with intent to disparage people, I come here to learn and exchange views. I give respect and would like to receive in turn. I do not like racial or insulting posts that only encourages radical thought.

You have more than once participated in outlandish and hateful posts and have more than once referred to me as "Jap".

I may not have complained to you then, but I am not blind to such personal insults.

So, check yourself before you wreck yourself.
 
.
You have repeatedly called my people as "Japs" time and time again when you know that is a racial slur. Have I ever once called or referred to Chinese people in racial terms or even uttered a racist word on the people of China? Never.

Because there is no room for such diatribe in proper discourse. As for me being "sentimental", I can guarantee it was because I was forced to defend my nation and people after some insults were hurled at me or on my people by some trolls .

I don't come here with intent to disparage people, I come here to learn and exchange views. I give respect and would like to receive in turn. I do not like racial or insulting posts that only encourages radical thought.

You have more than once participated in outlandish and hateful posts and have more than once referred to me as "Jap".

I may not have complained to you then, but I am not blind to such personal insults.

So, check yourself before you wreck yourself.
I admit it, I apologize to you for my sarcasm. That is definitely because I felt you appeared to have two faces(just like what I acused you of in a thread about Koreans), maybe it is my misconception. Just like what you just said, we come here to exchange viewpoint, so we should be enough frank, cannot tolerate any hypocrisy. I promise you there is no any words like Jap from me, I also advice that you express your viewpoit directly and frankly, you neednt be too careful. If you disagreed with me(call you Japs), you should express to me directly. And you can express your anger directly if you dislike others' statements. You are a very common Japanese like i have met:confused:. The viewpoints never do harm to people, but the obscure attitude to others is always unsavory.:cheers:
 
Last edited:
.
I admit it, I apologize to you for my sarcasm. That is definitely because I felt you appeared to have two faces(just like what I acused you of in a thread about Koreans), maybe it is my misconception. Just like what you just said, we come here to exchange viewpoint, so we should be enough frank, cannot tolerate any hypocrisy. I promise you there is no any words like Jap from me, I also advice that you express your viewpoit directly and frankly, you neednt be too careful. If you disagreed with me(call you Japs), you should express to me directly. And you can express your anger directly if you dislike others' statements. You are a very common Japanese like i have met:confused:. The viewpoints never do harm to people, but the obscure attitude to others is always unsavory.:cheers:

That is fine, i accept your apology. I also apologize if i may have said any things that you might have interpreted as insulting, know that there was no malicious intent in my postings. Next time i will be more direct with you and others. That said, let's get back to the subject matter now.

I thank you for your sincerity.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom