What's new

Syria's Assad wins 4th term with 95% of vote, in election the West calls fraudulent

Congratulations to Assad. West don't have problem with election fraud world witnessed in America.
 
.
This is from a Syrian. Not an Irani or a Saudi or a Turk.

The key thing he said - Syrians supported Assad because he did not leave his people. He stood with them.

 
.
Yes only 5% of Syrians are fighting him + iran+ shiitte mercenaries +Hezbollah+ Russia.
Quite an achievement for 5% of that population 🤣
Well as far as I know almost all countries in the region and their kingdoms were installed by western countries esp England ... in none of them you see democracy or even constitution to start with let alone ballot boxes king dies and son or brother would take the throne and still we see exellent relations btw western countries and them ... For example people in Baharain have been ruled by minority resulted in a revolution back in 2011 at the end what happened was KSA stepped in cracked down people and the king went visit Queen of England ....
You could be BinSaw and still receive weapons to invade your neighbors ...
On Syria American DOD sent a report to Obama in 2012 saying main insurgency in Syria are mainly MB, ALQ and Salafi movements that are supported by KSA, Qatar and Turkey and other American regional allies and the main goal is creating Islamic caliphate in there ... and the USA decided to help them ... :usflag:
So these guys paid bribes, sent weapons and terrorists to another sovereign country and made mayhem there .. weren't they concerns about democracy under Caliphate back then? now they are concern?

The world owe big to Syrians + iran+ shiitte fighters +Hezbollah+ Russia to put an end to isis ..
 
. . . .
West is ok with Sisi winning 97%. Sisi ousted Mohammed Morsi, an elected President in a military coup. But Assad winning 95% is fraudulent.

West can be okay with whatever, why are you using West to justify injustices? We are Muslims and acting upon Islamic principles. Stuff like this is condemnable, no matter who did it. Does not mean revolution is always solution. But, you have to go and condemn as a Muslim.
We had to fight.

You did nothing, Russia and US Coalition came in to restore control for you. Without Russia/US, your country and Israel are toast. Your country and Israel are source of all bloodshed in the region. Due to your expansionist and anti-Islam/Muslim ideals.
 
.
You guys are worse than ISIS. Modern day safavids. Statistically, your side has murdered and raped the most in this war.
Well those whom their output is isis,Taliban, ALQ, Bokohram, Al Shabab and so on must be angered when seeing them eradicated ...
Since the start of the conflict Iran insisted on elections and others under delusion of saying prayer in somewhere kept doing what I said in previous post and then got angered at each other some sanctioned abd imposed blockade some start to have war in other area .... right now many Arab countries have tried to open their relations with Syria ... go tell them don't do that ....
At the end Syrian must decide not others and that's the root of the problem we saw in Syria ... those whom destroyed Syria did it in Afghanistan, Libya and Yemen too not new ...
 
.
When you mean worse , you mean worse than :

5-6 million dead

Let's overstate by a factor of 10... it's 600.000 according to the anti-government SOHR (the one-man MI6-handled venture from London), not "5-6 million" (!).

And most of the victims were military men (170.000 to 180.000 among government forces and their regional allies; 110.000-150.000 among various insurgent groups; 40.000 among "I"SIS; 17.000 among Kurdish armed formations; about 600 foreign soldiers from other countries). Civilian casualties range from 120.000 to 160.000 (opposition claim).


By the way, even if the SOHR's totally bogus suggestion that "90%" of civilian casualties were caused by government forces was accurate, it would still mean that the military to civilian kill ratio of government forces was nearly 1:1. And this despite the fact that they had only very small amounts of precise munitions at their disposal, and that most of the fighting took place in densely populated urban areas because that's where the insurgents would stay.

Which in and by itself goes a long way debunking laughable fabricated tales (not shared by any serious source in the world, be it the UN or any rights group out there) about a supposed "genocide" carried out by the Syrian government. Even claims about large scale indiscriminate targeting of civilians by government forces are debunked by these figures. I repeat, a 1:1 military to civilian kill ratio, with most of the fighting happening in dense built-up areas and with a dearth of precision munitions - provided the pro-opposition "SOHR's" contention about civilian casualties is correct, which it most likely isn't. Meaning that in fact, government forces probably killed less civilians than terrorists!

Now compare this with the zionist regime's latest bombings of Gaza: 256 persons killed according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, of which 80 were fighters according to Hamas, which leaves 176 civilians victims. In other terms, despite overwhelming abundance of precision munitions (to a large extent courtesy of American taxpayers), despite superior intelligence resources, the zionist military killed more than twice as many civilians as it killed fighters.


So it is quite apparent who is proceeding with little regard for civilian casualties, and who is a victim of propaganda.
 
Last edited:
.
Let's overstate by a factor of 10... it's 600.000 dead according to the anti-government SOHR (the one-man MI6-handled venture from London), not "5-6 million" (!).

And most of the victims were military men (170.000 to 180.000 government forces and regional allies; 110.000-150.000 various insurgent groups; 40.000 ISIS; 17.000 Kurdish armed formations; about 600 foreign soldiers from other countries). Civilian casualties are between 120.000 and 160.000 (opposition claim).

My bad , thanks for the correction

That was supposed to be 7-8 million internally displaced . Which is also a sad number cause i imagine many of those " internally displaced " have no home to come back to.

~
 
.
My bad , thanks for the correction

That was supposed to be 7-8 million internally displaced . Which is also a sad number cause i imagine many of those " internally displaced " have no home to come back to.

~
Oh look at these crocodile tears! How bout them internally displaced Palestinians when you genocidal freeloaders took over their lands?
 
.
Oh look at these crocodile tears! How bout them internally displaced Palestinians when you genocidal freeloaders took over their lands?

nothing comes close to this numbers accept maybe the Iran Iraq war as far as casualties are concerned.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom