What's new

Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

SV-98 sniper rifle from uncle Putin

338312_800.jpg


6P41N Pecheneg-N machine gun equipped with night sight from uncle Putin

e51904dcaecd.jpg


Kord heavy machine gun from uncle Putin

CMEdZeEUMAUo4fo.jpg


NDF received BTR-82A tanks from uncle Putin. BTR-82A entered service in 2013 first saw action in conquest of Crimea last year equipped with night sight, 30 mm auto cannon and co-axial 7.62 mm machine gun, kevlar armor, battlefield management system.

CNH5iz-WcAE2wT0.jpg


CNHeH4NUYAAZqgl.jpg:large
 
Last edited:
.
Well, I went through the Wikipedia article before and found:
Khan al-Assal chemical attack - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No Burkan rockets were used in this attack.

It detonates a small HE charge on impact to send out the agent, enough to get rid of the outer shell.
Plus I'm sure a rocket with a combined weight of ~70 kilograms heading to the ground, either with it's own motor, or with the force of gravity (perhaps both) would leave a bigger mark than just barely a 1 foot hole in the ground.
There is no any reason for big crate. Here imacts of supersonic Uragan rocket that did not explode:

134879.jpg


96a1166bea85.jpg
 
.
Actually no, you are completely wrong. Those who fled were mostly Sunnis, since most recruits serve near their own areas and also I don't blame them either, since 5th columns and traitor generals in body of Iraqi army ordered them to retreat.

Those commanders would be executed in public to become a lesson for all traitors.

Or those commanders were actually ISIS sympathizers or moles ? Since most of ISIS leadership is Ex-Iraqi republican guards
 
. . . . . . .
But chem weapons fell, right?
Who did that then?
Its unclear who made it. Basically it was just one small chemical shell. Either very lucky shot of captured shell, or work accident. It has nothing to do with Ghouta attack, where massive use of large Burkan rockets was used. Rebels never had not a single such rocket.

No they are not. Sunni Arabs are only 15% in Iraq. They do not have the manpower to fight the Iraqi army and paramilitaries. They are definitely NOT from Iraq and Syria.
More than 15%, there is also a large Turkmen population. Plus they have much better commanders and battle experience.
 
. . .
If it was true there would be pics :) Nope nothing happened.
it will be interesting to see if anything further is revealed. There's a lot of detail to this story which could be true. It's also entirely possible that the Syrian's are keeping it quiet too in order to give Bibi a way out , and not force him to do something even more crazy.
that's not really what the article said is it? It said they have lost 18% of the territory they controlled in January 2015. According to the map, if 50% is "un-populated" , then the Syrian army controls approximately 30% of the rest. It appears to be the most important and significant part though, the part adjoining Lebanon-Hezbollah, and the coast.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom