Syrian Air Defense Intercepted 71 Cruise Missiles Launched by West - Russian MoD

[Oldman1]

Well until we really get all the facts, I'm impressed with the performance of the cruise missiles so far. Course it could just be more than that. Jamming the radar or spoofing them into thinking they hit something. Don't know if they are willing to try that or reveal how far those capabilities are and instead just fire the cruise missiles unaided and see how they perform without support.

Or the Russians just don't care and let them go through because they know we won't kill anyone, which is true in this one.

 

[Verve]

What has changed/happend seriously? What has been achieved by such a show?

Exactly ..... people harping on about missiles. Assad is still there, Russians still have the warm water port ... silly celebrations in West.

 

[LeGenD]

There is no concrete proof of 103 missiles strikes either. So far those are just words from Pentagon, and none on PDF have proof either. It is foolish to derive a 100% strike rate based on a video of a handful missiles strikes and a few pictures of damaged buildings!

FYI: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/damage-assessment-of-strikes-in-syria-by-nato-what-was-struck.553781/

Every single strike is recorded live by NATO assets; they have detailed profiles in the back-end. Unlike the amateurish footage(s) circulating around, NATO can show you high resolution [well-lit] recording of each missile strike with sophisticated cameras and stuff.

Pentagon can counter claims of skeptics with indispensable proof but it is not a public institution. Military operations are 'sensitive' matters and juicy details are not for public consumption.

They disclosed the exact amount of SAM unleashed by Syrian defenses during the course of strikes; 40 to be precise.

 

[Oldman1]

Exactly ..... people harping on about missiles. Assad is still there, Russians still have the warm water port ... silly celebrations in West.

The intent wasn't to kill Assad or remove the Russians from their naval port.

 

[airmarshal]

Chemicals weapons facility attacked no toxic chemical plumes! No one died due to explosion in stockpiles of weapons. This is quite fantastic.

@500

Unfortunate reality is that some members fall for such gimmicks and go as far as to misbehave with members who are exercising caution and speaking out against their propaganda.

You re doing western propaganda here but your flags show you are Pakistani. Be objective dont be a NATO spokesman here.

 

[Ceylal]

Chemicals weapons facility attacked no toxic chemical plumes! No one died due to explosion in stockpiles of weapons. This is quite fantastic.



You re doing western propaganda here but your flags show you are Pakistani. Be objective dont be a NATO spokesman here.

No he is not, it is just a left handed joke to the ones who believed that the Syrian government has a chemical weapon stockpile and has used them against its own population..
Most the pdf users are disappointed that the missile raid didn’t inflict casualties..and they claim that that the are Muslims...

 

[airmarshal]

By the way, this chemical facility, which some members are triumphantly celebrating destruction of, was clearing by OPCW in 2017 of any chemical weapons.

Sometimes frustrations also become celebrations.

 

[Verve]

FYI: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/damage-assessment-of-strikes-in-syria-by-nato-what-was-struck.553781/

Every single strike is recorded live by NATO assets; they have detailed profiles in the back-end. Unlike the amateurish footage(s) circulating around, NATO can show you high resolution [well-lit] recording of each missile strike with sophisticated cameras and stuff.

Pentagon can counter claims of skeptics with indispensable proof but it is not a public institution. Military operations are 'sensitive' matters and juicy details are not for public consumption.

They disclosed the exact amount of SAM unleashed by Syrian defenses during the course of strikes; 40 to be precise.

Yes, Iraqi WMD and Syrian Chemical attacks are sensitive matters that proofs of can't be disclosed for public consumption yet attacking another country in front of public is all ok, wow .. sheer hypocrisy.

Dude, there are no live recordings on that link of 103 missiles hitting their targets - please provide proof other than mere 4 pictures.

A press conference is not a proof, as I said before those are mere words just like syrians hitting 71 missiles.

 

[airmarshal]

There is no concrete proof of 103 missiles strikes either. So far those are just words from Pentagon, and none on PDF have proof either. It is foolish to derive a 100% strike rate based on a video of a handful missiles strikes and a few pictures of damaged buildings!

Remember when Clinton fired Tomahawk cruise missiles on Taliban? That was also a 100% strike. Some of the missiles landed in Pakistan and Pakistan's Babur cruise missile is derived from those crashed, undamaged missiles which were reverse engineered.

Americans weapons are very efficient and as I said before its only America which creates fake scenarios and arouses the capitalist/imperialist morality to wage illegal wars. Thus they get their weapons to test on innocent civilians and only battle tested weapons can be efficient, which they really are.

Exactly ..... people harping on about missiles. Assad is still there, Russians still have the warm water port ... silly celebrations in West.

This is the farthest they can go. If Russia was not in Syria and Syria not winning this war, Assad would have been history by now. There would have such an influx of Saudi terrorists and American air cover to support this mischief.

 

[F-22Raptor]

Yeah, Indian friend.

Pathetic liars out again.

Perhaps they actually fired 105 cruise missiles and Syrian defense failed to hit 200 of them.

This makes Rambo look more impressive.

We need third party independent evidence. Not doctored images from an organization that needs some sort of victory to prove its worth.

Use your Indian googling skills and find real evidence, please.

Still obsessed with my ethnicity LP? You really are pathetic.

I have posted plenty of evidence including video, satellite and ground photos. Where's yours?

 

[bsruzm]

Exactly ..... people harping on about missiles. Assad is still there, Russians still have the warm water port ... silly celebrations in West.

I support neither Russia nor US but I still don't get western point of strikes. Use of chemicals will continue within a month or two as well as "conventional" civilian struggle.

 

[Falcon29]

@500

Unfortunate reality is that some members fall for such gimmicks and go as far as to misbehave with members who are exercising caution and speaking out against their propaganda.

Appears to me only people supporting these claims are Shia. It's part of the protocol for the pro-Iran axis type of people to claim victory in every scenario. US is not seeking anything close to regime change, but they will tell you US can't and they are victorious against them. Reality is international community prefer secular Syria to what might come post-regime which is unclear.

I think we need to begin addressing what is the problem here, is that this conflict has turned sectarian, Salafi militants definitely contributed to that early on, but now that the coalition has defeated them, onus is now upon Shia to be mature and bring about political solution to this crisis. Instead of behaving like they are emboldened and threatening to employ Shia in other Arab nations on a daily basis. That's not good and is making it hard to understand Shia.

 

[Basel]

FYI: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/damage-assessment-of-strikes-in-syria-by-nato-what-was-struck.553781/

Every single strike is recorded live by NATO assets; they have detailed profiles in the back-end. Unlike the amateurish footage(s) circulating around, NATO can show you high resolution [well-lit] recording of each missile strike with sophisticated cameras and stuff.

Pentagon can counter claims of skeptics with indispensable proof but it is not a public institution. Military operations are 'sensitive' matters and juicy details are not for public consumption.

They disclosed the exact amount of SAM unleashed by Syrian defenses during the course of strikes; 40 to be precise.

Why you are supporting western propaganda here?? All sides in Syria are lying and no one is good guy there.

 

[LeGenD]

Yes, Iraqi WMD and Syrian Chemical attacks are sensitive matters that proofs of can't be disclosed for public consumption yet attacking another country in front of public is all ok, wow .. sheer hypocrisy.

Dude, there are no live recordings on that link of 103 missiles hitting their targets - please provide proof other than mere 4 pictures.

A press conference is not a proof, as I said before those are mere words just like syrians hitting 71 missiles.

Bro, you misunderstood my point.

I pointed out that Pentagon would have live recordings of their strikes but they may not release such information to the public. Every missile has an onboard camera and stuff which provide live feed of its flight path (and engagement) to the relevant center of operations.

In-fact, Pentagon disclosed how many SAM were fired by Syrian defenses to stop their barrage. Everything is recorded.

Why you are supporting western propaganda here?? All sides in Syria are lying and no one is good guy there.

Bro,

I am only interested in technicalities and what transpired. To this end, I created this thread: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/damage-assessment-of-strikes-in-syria-by-nato-what-was-struck.553781/

I do not have personal stakes in Syrian politics and sectarian BS beneath. Not my cup of tea.

 

[Ceylal]

Russia already spoke about it... "100% Intercept with a new kind of

Appears to me only people supporting these claims are Shia. It's part of the protocol for the pro-Iran axis type of people to claim victory in every scenario. US is not seeking anything close to regime change, but they will tell you US can't and they are victorious against them. Reality is international community prefer secular Syria to what might come post-regime which is unclear.

I think we need to begin addressing what is the problem here, is that this conflict has turned sectarian, Salafi militants definitely contributed to that early on, but now that the coalition has defeated them, onus is now upon Shia to be mature and bring about political solution to this crisis. Instead of behaving like they are emboldened and threatening to employ Shia in other Arab nations on a daily basis. That's not good and is making it hard to understand Shia.

they just few as..s hole as yourself, that see a sectarian arm wrestling everywhere...