Sweden not only opposes Pak-Iran pipeline, also deems TAPI not viable
- Thread starter Devil Soul
- Start date
Devil Soul
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 22,931
- Reaction score
- 45
- Country
- Location
kia pidee kia pidee kar soorba ..lol 
Yeh sab 'Amreeka ke Pathe' hain.
Respect4Respect01
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2010
- Messages
- 3,899
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
all these countries say what usa orders them to say, no surprise.
RayKalm
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2012
- Messages
- 2,924
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Don't go that far.
A1Kaid
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2008
- Messages
- 9,667
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
I was just kidding...
These comments might be doing a favour.
Sweden obviously will be opposed to ip pipes, hardly surprising.
But, if they have good reason to believe tapi is untenable, which is not the same as opposition then that makes Pakistan case for the ip line stronger!!
Sweden obviously will be opposed to ip pipes, hardly surprising.
But, if they have good reason to believe tapi is untenable, which is not the same as opposition then that makes Pakistan case for the ip line stronger!!
eik_pagall
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2011
- Messages
- 255
- Reaction score
- 0
Sweden can F. off
JAT BALWAN
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,983
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Sweden.....
Now they want to act like USA???
Now they want to act like USA???
Shardul.....the lion
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2011
- Messages
- 3,074
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
who cares..... where is sweden in world map or politics?
why is India not investing? The bank which is immune from US sanctions can take part in TAPI or IPI.
why is India not investing? The bank which is immune from US sanctions can take part in TAPI or IPI.
niaz
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2006
- Messages
- 5,164
- Reaction score
- 211
- Country
- Location
We need the IPI Pipeline but IMHO it is not going to be built because Pakistan does not have the money and it would be difficult to find a third party to finance it in the face of US opposition.
Besides, we are unable to safeguard the pipelines already in existence, it is reasonable to assume that it won’t be possible to police such a long pipeline and supply disruption would be the norm as BLA will blowing it up.
I agree that TAPI pipeline doesnot appear to be feasible and is probably nothing but a carrot offered to Pakistan to desist us from following up on IPI pipeline. Even if it is actually built, it would take a very long time.
It seems that only workable alternative is to go the LNG route. Qatar has the largest gas reserves in world and plenty of LNG for export. We can set up LNG receiving terminals along the coast and supply southern region with gas from LNG imports leaving indigenous gas to meet demand of the northern part.
Besides, we are unable to safeguard the pipelines already in existence, it is reasonable to assume that it won’t be possible to police such a long pipeline and supply disruption would be the norm as BLA will blowing it up.
I agree that TAPI pipeline doesnot appear to be feasible and is probably nothing but a carrot offered to Pakistan to desist us from following up on IPI pipeline. Even if it is actually built, it would take a very long time.
It seems that only workable alternative is to go the LNG route. Qatar has the largest gas reserves in world and plenty of LNG for export. We can set up LNG receiving terminals along the coast and supply southern region with gas from LNG imports leaving indigenous gas to meet demand of the northern part.
Similar threads
