What's new

Suu Kyi could be held guilty of crimes against humanity, says UN special envoy

They should get their place in Myanmar with proportional land to their initial numbers.


Solution is very simple - BD annexes northern Arakan and the Rohingya refugees will all go back to their lands.
Chinese economic interests are also not affected at all.
 
.
Solution is very simple - BD annexes northern Arakan and the Rohingya refugees will all go back to their lands.
Chinese economic interests are also not affected at all.
I think it should be made an autonomous region with a consortium of countries providing security under UN or any other international arrangement/agreement.
 
.
I think it should be made an autonomous region with a consortium of countries providing security under UN or any other international arrangement/agreement.

You can do that to start off with but in the end BD will need to annex it, as the other countries will lose interest and then it will be at the mercy of the Barman savages.
 
Last edited:
.
Solution is very simple - BD annexes northern Arakan and the Rohingya refugees will all go back to their lands.
Chinese economic interests are also not affected at all.
180px-Burma_en.png


Thing is BD is without a political/military strength to take over north Arakan. The military buildup in BD may be defensive in nature. Only the Rohingyas can do it. But, they are not organized and are not brave enough. Moreover, it is almost impossible for a small population of one or two million to wage a guerrilla war unless the terrain has vast areas of mountains and jungle.

China will lose its economic interests if the gas pipeline from Arakan coast is destroyed or is not connected to China south.
 
.
But, they are not organized and are not brave enough.
I have a different opinion on this.If you consider the Rohingya V force in WW2 and Rohingya Mujaheedin movement in 1950s, Then it is certainly not the case.Their main problem is not lack of bravery or lack of organizational skill, but small number and lack of any foreign backer specially Bangladesh.
 
Last edited:
. .
It's just a conspiracy to disrupt Chinese pipelines. If there was no Chinese pipeline to disrupt, the West would never even care.

Western countries like USA do far worse atrocities to more numerous people within its borders -- and they support allies who do far worse atrocities to more numerous people within their borders.

This Korean lady from the UN is just a puppet for Western interests.
 
.
They should get their place in Myanmar with proportional land to their initial numbers.

No doubt.

Thing is BD is without a political/military strength to take over north Arakan. The military buildup in BD may be defensive in nature. Only the Rohingyas can do it. But, they are not organized and are not brave enough. Moreover, it is almost impossible for a small population of one or two million to wage a guerrilla war unless the terrain has vast areas of mountains and jungle.

The Jews did it with Israel.
 
.
India and China will oppose it till death.
 
.
GCC countries feed you, Indian beggar. So don't spit on the hand that feeds you.

No, the GCC countries have no connection with me personally.

You may be a boot licker of the Gulfies but I am not. ;)
 
.
GCC countries feed you, Indian beggar. So don't spit on the hand that feeds you.

You are worlds last wife do you know? And who are you saying this to? You have been taken to bed by each powerful men for a price.

And I won’t laugh but you are still for sale!!
 
.
No, the GCC countries have no connection with me personally.

You may be a boot licker of the Gulfies but I am not. ;)
India earns most remittances from Muslim countries...
face it, they feed you poor Indian beggars :D
You are worlds last wife do you know? And who are you saying this to? You have been taken to bed by each powerful men for a price.

And I won’t laugh but you are still for sale!!
Saying a toilet deprived HIV affected Indian, raped by Muslims for centuries.
 
.
It's just a conspiracy to disrupt Chinese pipelines. If there was no Chinese pipeline to disrupt, the West would never even care.

Western countries like USA do far worse atrocities to more numerous people within its borders -- and they support allies who do far worse atrocities to more numerous people within their borders.

This Korean lady from the UN is just a puppet for Western interests.

Does not matter if it is a conspiracy or not.
Rohingya need to live in peace and dignity on THEIR land free from the murdering and raping Barman savages.
Anyway BD annexing northern Arakan will not affect China's pipelines or port, which will not be on the land BD takes over.
 
.
It's just a conspiracy to disrupt Chinese pipelines. If there was no Chinese pipeline to disrupt, the West would never even care.
.

This is a conspiracy theory. I know burmese are subscribing this theory to squeeze china and doing more damage to themselves than any good. End of the day all third world $hithole like Myanmar need west more than China.

The place Rohingya lives is far away from Chinese pipelines. You should worry more about Indian presence in MM than Rohingyas. Indians will make sure that Your presence in Rakhine is no more than a commercial venture. Thats why they put a counter project called Kaladan port.

180px-Burma_en.png


Thing is BD is without a political/military strength to take over north Arakan. The military buildup in BD may be defensive in nature. Only the Rohingyas can do it. But, they are not organized and are not brave enough. Moreover, it is almost impossible for a small population of one or two million to wage a guerrilla war unless the terrain has vast areas of mountains and jungle.

China will lose its economic interests if the gas pipeline from Arakan coast is destroyed or is not connected to China south.
I always in favor of supporting Rakhine community and build up Arakan Army. In the long run it will return more result than investing on Rohingya Mojaheed. We had great success with ULFA.
 
.
It's just a conspiracy to disrupt Chinese pipelines. If there was no Chinese pipeline to disrupt, the West would never even care.

Western countries like USA do far worse atrocities to more numerous people within its borders -- and they support allies who do far worse atrocities to more numerous people within their borders.

This Korean lady from the UN is just a puppet for Western interests.
that's one more thing behind this. bro
they want to cover up their military strikes in Yemen and Syria which killed thousand of people and made many refuge to neighboring countries. That's much worse than what is happening in Myanmar. US will get at least 2 advantage from highlighting rakhine case in their media. such as 1) it will downplay what they are doing in Syria and Yemen and 2) it will also please their largest weapon buyers for what they did and 3) to disrupt China projects in Rakhine. many birds in one shot. if there was no rohingya problem , China projects can move forward with ease. now both China and Myanmar have to rethink about the project due to the region is unstable.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom