@MH.Yang
There are very few countries in the world that have a rich or as successful pedigree in aviation than the UK.
What is proof about the EF2000? I dont follow -
1. EF2000 Positioning error, it's a interceptor. Do the British need a interceptor?
2. Except for supersonic performance, it is not good in other aspects.
3. EF2000's radar is a mechanical scanning flat-panel radar, and it is only 750mm, which is even smaller than the AWG9 of the F14.
4. Its canard wing is too far away, and its low altitude mobility must be bad. If at low altitude and low speed, the EF2000 is equivalent to a delta wing fighter.
5. In order to improve the maneuverability at high angles of attack, the EF2000 added a winglet, which was a failed operation of phantom 2000 in the 1970s.
6. Modern 4G aircraft, except for early Russian fighters, have integrated anti-jamming devices into the body, and only EF2000 use anti-jamming silos. Even the early Russian Su27 only hung interference hoists, only EF2000 used pods to drag bait.
I don't mention that EF2000 didn't have money to buy aircraft guns. Finally, it put a piece of cement in the plane.