What's new

Su-75 Checkmate. Russia's latest attempt to compete with the big boys J-10 and F-16 in the medium size single engine category.

Don't be so gullible. The West has been burying Russia for centuries. All their invasions since Middle Ages failed because of total underestimating of Russia. We already developing 6th gen fighter, stealth unmanned fighter S-70 and new strategic bomber PAK-DA. Russia will live for centuries after West's collapse and disappearing.

Russians are tough, never met one who wasn’t.
 
Су-75 The design of the inlet is very ingenious. It adopts a U-shaped inlet, which integrates the lower jaw and two rib inlet. It not only solves the inlet at high angle of attack, but also can narrow the inlet opening. Even the air inlet leaves space for the combat missile cabin.

Its combat missile cabin penetrates the main landing gear, and then blocks the flame and strengthens the structure through the diaphragm. The design is also excellent.
1630664462149.jpeg
 
Better than anything the UK can produce:)

RS20220_DP118010-lpr-1.jpg


No - Tempest is better. Tempest will fly - Checkmate will crash and burn - Russia does not have the money to complete Checkmate - UK and its partners do.

( oh look - good rearward visibility - how novel a concept is that ?! )...
 
Don't be so gullible. The West has been burying Russia for centuries. All their invasions since Middle Ages failed because of total underestimating of Russia. We already developing 6th gen fighter, stealth unmanned fighter S-70 and new strategic bomber PAK-DA. Russia will live for centuries after West's collapse and disappearing.
Russia will live and will become strong,as is mentioned in Prophecies. But 6th generation fighter? Come on man!
 
RS20220_DP118010-lpr-1.jpg


No - Tempest is better. Tempest will fly - Checkmate will crash and burn - Russia does not have the money to complete Checkmate - UK and its partners do.

( oh look - good rearward visibility - how novel a concept is that ?! )...

To tell the truth, if the engine is not considered, the British are no better than the Indians in designing aircraft.

EF2000 is the best proof.
 
To tell the truth, if the engine is not considered, the British are no better than the Indians in designing aircraft.

EF2000 is the best proof.

@MH.Yang

There are very few countries in the world that have a rich or as successful pedigree in aviation than the UK.

What is proof about the EF2000? I dont follow -
 
@MH.Yang

There are very few countries in the world that have a rich or as successful pedigree in aviation than the UK.

What is proof about the EF2000? I dont follow -

1. EF2000 Positioning error, it's a interceptor. Do the British need a interceptor?
2. Except for supersonic performance, it is not good in other aspects.
3. EF2000's radar is a mechanical scanning flat-panel radar, and it is only 750mm, which is even smaller than the AWG9 of the F14.
4. Its canard wing is too far away, and its low altitude mobility must be bad. If at low altitude and low speed, the EF2000 is equivalent to a delta wing fighter.
5. In order to improve the maneuverability at high angles of attack, the EF2000 added a winglet, which was a failed operation of phantom 2000 in the 1970s.
6. Modern 4G aircraft, except for early Russian fighters, have integrated anti-jamming devices into the body, and only EF2000 use anti-jamming silos. Even the early Russian Su27 only hung interference hoists, only EF2000 used pods to drag bait.

I don't mention that EF2000 didn't have money to buy aircraft guns. Finally, it put a piece of cement in the plane.
 
Russia will live and will become strong,as is mentioned in Prophecies. But 6th generation fighter? Come on man!
It is non- stop process. Americans and Chinese do it, too.
 
Back
Top Bottom