What's new

Stealth or Electronics? better use of money spent on aircraft ?

A professor argues that since 100% stealth is not achievable, the amount of money spent on making an aircraft stealthy should rather be spent on electronics such Counter measures for survivability and ease of mission capability etc. According to him, the evolution in radars will always compete with stealth, never letting stealth get an upper hand every time.

In the military environment, survivability is defined as the ability to remain mission capable after a single engagement.

Your thoughts?
Radar tech is just waiting for a brake through,that would make current LOP's advantage of stealth absolute.Latest quantum radar tech could make stealth aircraft obsolete,that's already getting discussed.
https://www.siliconrepublic.com/machines/quantum-radar-stealth-aircraft-obsolete
 
.
.
They shoot 1000 BVR missiles they can down every single Iraqi and Serbian fighter jet which lack BVR missiles.
and give an example that US/allied air forces fires 1000 BVR to single Iraqi/Serbian targets @undertakerwwefan o_O

You keep talking about a scenario that has less probability of happening than a giant meteor hitting Earth and killing all life as we know it. You are paranoid. You need serious psych treatment. Like I said, get over it.

Why you're to getting personal insult @undertakerwwefan o_O May be you have no Answer for me @undertakerwwefan :enjoy:

So in other words, what you can see with your eyes, the radar can see? Everyone can see F-22 just fine. Nothing stealth about it.
Yes Radar can see Stealth jets but far more closer than conventional fighter jets @undertakerwwefan :angel:
 
.
Yes Radar can see Stealth jets but far more closer than conventional fighter jets @undertakerwwefan :angel:

Well duh. The same is true for any spectrum. T-34 was highly resistant to incoming shells because it was round. Round things deflect better than perpendicular things.

Light travels in straight lines. If you don't want light reflected back, you try to deflect it away at an angle from the direction it came.
 
.
A professor argues that since 100% stealth is not achievable, the amount of money spent on making an aircraft stealthy should rather be spent on electronics such Counter measures for survivability and ease of mission capability etc. According to him, the evolution in radars will always compete with stealth, never letting stealth get an upper hand every time.

In the military environment, survivability is defined as the ability to remain mission capable after a single engagement.

Your thoughts?
Well it depend on role. But yes Electronics and Serviceability is very important compare to stealth and stealth can be cover via speed and counter measurements.
 
.
Well duh. The same is true for any spectrum. T-34 was highly resistant to incoming shells because it was round. Round things deflect better than perpendicular things.

Light travels in straight lines. If you don't want light reflected back, you try to deflect it away at an angle from the direction it came.
I am talking talking about RADAR and SAMs not shells or anti aircraft guns @undertakerwwefan
 
.
I am talking talking about RADAR and SAMs not shells or anti aircraft guns @undertakerwwefan

Same concept. If you don't want something reflected back, you deflect it at an angle from the direction it came.

If you see someone throw a ball at you and you don't want the ball reflected back, you want to deflect it away from the direction it came.
 
.
You keep talking about a scenario that has less probability of happening than a giant meteor hitting Earth and killing all life as we know it. You are paranoid. You need serious psych treatment. Like I said, get over it.

Future air to air wars will be fought on BVR arena that why all 5th generation jets have a main payloads of BVR missiles, you addmit or not @undertakerwwefan
 
. .
. . .
Source? If you are making this up then you are promoting violence.
Keep blabbering @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah: and you're not promoting violence/hate to bash Soviet/Russian military tech and degrade Western military tech without knowing any think about military tech @undertakerwwefan
Keep blabbering without a base @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:

Source? If you are making this up then you are promoting violence.
You're one of the worst troller/basher/ranter here on PDF @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:

Source? If you are making this up then you are promoting violence.
the whole world thinks that @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah: ,then why Russian, China, USA, NATO developing ICBM for targeting Qaeda fags @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: then why they develop 5th/6th gen jets for targeting Qaeda Fags and for creating jobs @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
Stealth ? Electronics? or tough as S*** and a BFG the same debate the pentagon had , which billion dollar aircraft should we buy.
Or just stick with the cheep one that gets the job done.
landscape-1447865916-a10-rainbow.jpg
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom