What's new

Sri Lankan Political Discussions

@Gibbs It's too early to say because some areas are just destroyed beyond repair. This is particularly true for East which he tries to say otherwise but even recently I met an Irish woman who has worked in the Eastern province for some projects who told me that in large parts of east, women are not even allowed to go out. So putting blame entirely on BBS which was created as a part of reaction is plain wrong.

Being communal minded is very backward and it applies to many ethnic and religious groups in Sri Lanka, not just Muslims. I appreciate their ability to see this problem as it is. Good intention indeed. I wish them good luck.
 
.
@Gibbs, @Azizam, @HeinzG

I read the interview. I dont find it a good development.

1. They say they are promoting inclusive politics but they are doing the same thing SLMC doing. At least SLMC participated in every government.
2. Surely BBS has changed the political landscapes of them. As SLMC could not do anything concrete they are seen as weak leaders.
3. These guys are doing nothing but eating into SLMC's electorate. Explains why SLMC has become hyperactive past years :D
4. But the worrisome part is when he said he has talked with the TNA to have a separate region for them within a combined North and East.

This government should support SLMC to retain their voter base and to help them have the CM position in Eastern Province. I am not happy with the way UNP gover handles some issues which are sensitive to SL.
 
. .
@Azizam @HeinzG @Saradiel

US May Seek Postponement of UNHRC Resolution Against Lanka -The New Indian Express

  • Nisha%20Biswal%20meets%20TNA%20leaders%20.jpg

    US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia, Nisha Biswal meets TNA leaders in Colombo.
COLOMBO: Keeping in view the delicate political situation in SriLanka,the United States may ask the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to postpone the taking up of a resolution against that country at its March session, informed sources in the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) told Express here on Wednesday.

US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia, Nisha Biswal, had hinted at this during her interaction with TNA leaders on Tuesday, the sources said.

The US is very happy with the exit of the hostile government of Mahinda Rajapaksa and sees a bright future for US-Lanka relations during the tenure of President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. The US does not want to upset the Lankan apple cart by presenting a strong anti-Lankan resolution at the UNHRC.

Biswal is understood to have warned that a strong resolution accusing the island nation of committing war crimes will be exploited by ultra nationalist forces opposed to accommodation with the Tamils, which could in turn result in Rajapaksa’s coming back to power through the June parliamentary elections.

The Sirisena government has a crowded and wide ranging agenda to fulfill in the first hundred days before it faces a very challenging parliamentary election. A strong resolution at the UNHRC at this juncture may take attention away from the politically crucial 100 day program, Biswal reportedly said.

However, TNA leaders told Biswal in no uncertain terms that they cannot allow the Tamil issue to be brushed under the carpet. Their fear is that once Colombo and Washington cozy up to each other, the Tamil issue will be put on the back burner and other bilateral issues will be brought to the fore.

“Now we are not sure if a resolution will be presented even at the next UNHRC session in September,” a dejected TNA activist said.

“The Lankan government is looking after its interest. Washington and New Delhi look after their own interests. Nobody will look after the Tamils’ interests except the Tamils. That is why we are speaking up,” said a TNA MP.

Sirisena Govt Indifferent

The TNA complained to Biswal about the non-performance of the Sirisena government on the Tamil question. Basic issues such as devolution, land grabbing by the military, and resettlement of the war displaced, now living in 30 camps, are still to the attended to.

According to a Tamil MP, pilgrims who got permission to enter the High Security Zone at Myliddy in Jaffna district to perform pooja at a temple on Thai Poosam day, were shocked to find the Kovil gone and a hotel coming up in its place. Hotels are coming up in places which Tamils cannot enter, he said.
 
. .
Suddenly Sri Lanka has become good for US. How? @Gibbs @Saradiel

It's pretty obvious does'nt it.. They didnt really like Rajapaksa or the overtly reliance his regime had on China.. But that does not any way alter the fact that the people of Sri Lanka and by that i mean 49% of the Sinhalese majority included (In case if you bring that up :-)) wanted a change.. And they didnt change him for his foreign policy but as you know for his domestic policies

Any way you will see a much more vigorous courting of the new govt not only by the Us but also by the EU,Japan, India, Malaysia, Singapore and Russia in the coming days.. Lets just say that SL just opened up it's market doors once again
 
.
It's pretty obvious does'nt it.. They didnt really like Rajapaksa or the overtly reliance his regime had on China..

You mean they didn't like the fact that Sri Lanka wasn't their bitch.
 
.
It's pretty obvious does'nt it.. They didnt really like Rajapaksa or the overtly reliance his regime had on China.. But that does not any way alter the fact that the people of Sri Lanka and by that i mean 49% of the Sinhalese majority included (In case if you bring that up :-)) wanted a change.. And they didnt change him for his foreign policy but as you know for his domestic policies

Any way you will see a much more vigorous courting of the new govt not only by the Us but also by the EU,Japan, India, Malaysia, Singapore and Russia in the coming days.. Lets just say that SL just opened up it's market doors once again

Well MS has already stated that he will continue the China policy of MR. Do you think he lied? Anyway US has once again showed that they do not care about anyone's humane rights. For the past 6 years they fought rigorously with SL gov. for the so called justice for the Tamil people. But within a month of the regime change they are ready to drop all charges against SL. The trick was the regime change. Now in SL there is a pro-US government. In the past we have seen several pro-US government in action notably, JR-Premadasa regime, Ranil regime etc., Those times were the most regressive years of our country. I hope under MS regime we would progress further rather than regress back to old times.

About the market. SL has never closed it's market for anyone. Rather West didn't come to our market. We didn't won the West this time. Rather they won over us.
 
.
Well MS has already stated that he will continue the China policy of MR. Do you think he lied? Anyway US has once again showed that they do not care about anyone's humane rights. For the past 6 years they fought rigorously with SL gov. for the so called justice for the Tamil people. But within a month of the regime change they are ready to drop all charges against SL. The trick was the regime change. Now in SL there is a pro-US government. In the past we have seen several pro-US government in action notably, JR-Premadasa regime, Ranil regime etc., Those times were the most regressive years of our country. I hope under MS regime we would progress further rather than regress back to old times.

About the market. SL has never closed it's market for anyone. Rather West didn't come to our market. We didn't won the West this time. Rather they won over us.

Nobody is under the illusion that the US is not after thier own interests.. But there needs to be a clear line.. Cant afford to be a part of global power politics.. Rajapaksa's thought too highly of themselves espoused Western conspiracies to excuse whatever misdeeds they did, When that didnt help they started reigniting racial and religious tension

West was the main market mate.. Never underestimate that.. SL dont sell zilch to China.. Even with all the anti western rhetoric, The EU and the US remained the biggest export markets.. Cant keep antagonizing them.. Whatever thier ulterior motives are.. Play smart.. That where Lanka lost in good diplomacy

Btw what regression did the JR administration do ? It was one of the most progressive era's of the country.. If not for Indira Ghandi's regime attempts at destabilizing the country by exporting terrorism.. The country would have been second only to the likes of Japan and Korea
 
Last edited:
.
Nobody is under the illusion that the US is not after thier own interests.. But there needs to be a clear line.. Cant afford to be a part of global power politics.. Rajapaksa's thought too highly of themselves espoused Western conspiracies to excuse whatever misdeeds they did, When that didnt help they started reigniting racial and religious tension

US interest do not tally with our own. That is what we need to keep remind ourselves. The only reason AFAIK US has watered down the resolution is that UNP is in power. UNP is the lackey of US embassy. I'm not mocking the UNP but it's leadership. JR and RW is the most pro-US sympathizers we ever had as leaders of the country. At least JR had a vision but RW? I dunno.

Whether we like it or not we are part of the global power politics. There is no non-alignment style option today. We need to pick a side in order to survive. The trick is selecting the right side.

West was the main market mate.. Never underestimate that.. SL dont sell zilch to China.. Even with all the anti western rhetoric, The EU and the US remained the biggest export markets.. Cant keep antagonizing them.. Whatever thier ulterior motives are.. Play smart.. That where Lanka lost in good diplomacy

So because west is our biggest market we need to say yea to what ever their demand. I don't think that is correct foreign policy. We need to have a balanced foreign policy where much of the weight rest in Asia and Russia. However UNP foreign policy is solely fixed on West. UNP has no alternative foreign policy other than siding with West. Their method of foreign policy has become pill for the all ills. The western market card is the main thing they show when questioned. I think we need to get away from the West depended mindset.

MR had a specific policy for SL when we were neglected and bullied on and it was the correct one. We need to increase our influence in the Asian region and we should search for new markets elsewhere other than the West. But I don't expect that kind of progressive thinking from the UNP policy makers.

Btw what regression did the JR administration do ? It was one of the most progressive era's of the country.. If not for Indira Ghandi's regime attempts at destabilizing the country by exporting terrorism.. The country would have been second only to the likes of Japan and Korea

The progressiveness of his era was cancelled out by the sheer weight of regression that followed. He let LTTE to rise and let the Tamil issue go out of control. He opened our market to the foreign products without protecting our own industries. The things that JR did for the country more harm than good.

Indira was driven to support LTTE because one for her personnel dislike of JR (JR has supported Indira's arch rival but didn't try to rectify the situation later when Indira was in power) and second for JR stupid foreign policy of siding with the West. The years of 1977-1994 was one of the darkest times of our country and one of the most regressive ever. We still suffer from ill decisions taken during that time.
 
.
US interest do not tally with our own. That is what we need to keep remind ourselves. The only reason AFAIK US has watered down the resolution is that UNP is in power. UNP is the lackey of US embassy. I'm not mocking the UNP but it's leadership. JR and RW is the most pro-US sympathizers we ever had as leaders of the country. At least JR had a vision but RW? I dunno.

Whether we like it or not we are part of the global power politics. There is no non-alignment style option today. We need to pick a side in order to survive. The trick is selecting the right side.



So because west is our biggest market we need to say yea to what ever their demand. I don't think that is correct foreign policy. We need to have a balanced foreign policy where much of the weight rest in Asia and Russia. However UNP foreign policy is solely fixed on West. UNP has no alternative foreign policy other than siding with West. Their method of foreign policy has become pill for the all ills. The western market card is the main thing they show when questioned. I think we need to get away from the West depended mindset.

MR had a specific policy for SL when we were neglected and bullied on and it was the correct one. We need to increase our influence in the Asian region and we should search for new markets elsewhere other than the West. But I don't expect that kind of progressive thinking from the UNP policy makers.



The progressiveness of his era was cancelled out by the sheer weight of regression that followed. He let LTTE to rise and let the Tamil issue go out of control. He opened our market to the foreign products without protecting our own industries. The things that JR did for the country more harm than good.

Indira was driven to support LTTE because one for her personnel dislike of JR (JR has supported Indira's arch rival but didn't try to rectify the situation later when Indira was in power) and second for JR stupid foreign policy of siding with the West. The years of 1977-1994 was one of the darkest times of our country and one of the most regressive ever. We still suffer from ill decisions taken during that time.

Mate it's simply amazing to me how seemingly educated knowledgeable people like yourself would have probably brain washed to over value the significance of Lanka over these years.. I'm not trying to undermine it's proud sovereignty as you may know i will defend the country of my birth in any apparent misinformation.. But you seem to lack a real knowledge about global real politiks, Economics and it's bases.. East is where the global economics are shifting to but that shift is being made by selling it's goods and services to the West.. And how significant and influential do you think Sri lanka is against this trend ? SL is no China, It's no India, SL does not have a massive domestic markets, massive industrial bases

I reiterate, West holds massive influence on multi national agencies including the UN, West is the market place for 90% of your exports, West that includes Japan basically controls how the monetary networks of the world works that includes the IMF and the World bank, The world trade organization, The G7,G20.. How significant and influential do you think Sri Lanka is to go against this trend ? Do you know the EU red carded your fisheries and that loss amounted to $ 6 billion to the country ? Do you think attritional politics can get it back ? The GSP, The GSP + trade incentives?? Do you think Chinese will buy the fish ?? No because the Chinese sell fish to the EU themselves, The Chinese do not buy SL garments, Because unlike Bangladesh and India, Sri Lanka dont produce mass market clothes, Because they cant compete with the cheap labor that those countries use.. SL niché in high end high quality productions.. European fashion houses buys them and in turn sell it to the rich in China etc.. Where do we sell our BPO's and rapidly growing IT sector, Outsourcing services ?? China ?? Indonesia ??

You cant think like a frog in a well bro.. The real world is vastly different to what you may made to think as

I'm in no way advocating subservience to the West or reducing Chinese investments or interests, On the contrary, What you need is a balanced act and the former regime failed miserably in that, This one seems to be trying to repair it
 
.
Ceylon Today | There are signs of democracy and good governance

Dr. Suren Raghavan an academic-political expert, who also played a key role in the peace process at government and non – government level during former President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga's regime said the 100 day programme is well spelt out in the election manifesto.

Dr. Raghavan who is also an expert in Federalist ideas said, "Removing the Military Governor and Provincial Chief Secretary in the North, lifting the travel ban, a process of releasing the political prisoners and rehabilitation for the LTTE cadres, starting to implement the 13A are all possible within 100 days. I think the government is serious. Appointing Justice K.Sripavan as Chief Justice is a clear signal in that direction,"



Q:
How do you view the change in regime after almost 10 years?
A: At her 67th independence year, Sri Lanka perhaps has got an unmatched opportunity in her State formation at structural level.
Within the last 20 plus days what the new administration has been able to initiate give great signs of democracy and good governance. What Sri Lanka has achieved on the 9th of January should not be considered in a light manner.


Q:
Most of the minority political parties claim that President Maithripala Sirisena secured victory with the majority votes of the minorities. As an academic and political expert how do you view this?
A: I do not have to be apologetic to share the fact that Tamils of North and East contributed very uniquely to the victory of President Sirisena, so as the Muslims and other communities.


President Sirisena won with a margin of some 450,000 votes. He obtained nearly 876,000 votes from the North and East. In that sense if the Tamils of the North and East did not vote for him in that high volume his vote base would have been 5.44 million votes from the rest of the island where as former President Rajapaksa's vote bank was 5.76 million.
Therefore, I would argue that the Tamils have send few clear signals to the Southern brothers and sisters that they still believe in a united Sri Lanka, they are willing to work with a democratic Southern government and that they are willing to forgive the past even the recent past during which the Tamil nation suffered limitlessly but work with the South as equal partners.


Q:
How do you view the strategies of the new government to solve the issues of Tamils in the North and East?
I have close friends in TNA, UNP, SLFP and JHU. So I have provided my expertise in democratization and ethno-religious nationalist political bargains. I did contribute to some area of cohesive voice building with a national reconciliation process in mind. In terms of what the new government has in mind we are not sure, since TNA supported President Sirisena without any pre-election Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) because that was the need of the hour.


But the new Prime Minister in his inaugural speech in the Parliament in presence of the newly elect president declared that the government is keen to pursue a solution based on the 13th Amendment. That is a very encouraging step.
Looking at the actions they have taken so far, I have reasons to believe that they are keen and honest about their efforts. One further important issue is that JHU and its Sangha leader Venerable Athuraliye Rathana Thera is a partner to the campaign for President Sirisena and they have openly expressed their willing to support a genuine process of political partnership with the Tamils. I believe this is the first time such position was reached so it is very hope giving situation for the Tamils and all peace loving democrats of this country.


Q:
Do you feel there are positive chances for the minorities to achieve their political goals through proper implementation of the 13th Amendment? Also, currently TNA leader Sampanthan has requested President Maithripala Sirisena to appoint an exclusive body to solve the issue. How do you view this?
A: After nearly three decades no one in this country has fully experienced the fruits of the 13th Amendment. This Amendment is still a solid framework for us to begin to negotiate the aspiration of the Tamils. Now in political theory we agree that many nations can live within a single State boundary. They became multinational democracies. I look at the morality of politics than the legality. As long as the majority Sinhalese are willing to accept that the Tamils are fully equal citizens and their collective political aspirations are a legitimate part of the State of Sri Lanka we can start working, since beyond the written Constitution the political willing and culture of the Sinhalese that would determine the future democracy.


Q:
The new government has come forward to resettle those who are yet to be settled in the North and East. Minister of Resettlement Swaminathan said his main goal during the 100 day programme would be to resettle people from Valikamam North. However, the process seems a long one. Do you feel it would be practical? Do you feel the entire crowd would get chances to return back to their own places?
A: The devastation during the war was beyond words and the neglect during the post- war five years was even worse. So there is a huge job to be done socially, demographically, economically, physically and psychologically.
There is a full time cabinet minister, but what does that mean? We had such ministers even before. The question is how much of power, money and will such ministry has within to reach this huge task.


Q:
The TNA is urging to remove all the unnecessary security check points in the North. But the newly elected government has said that they cannot remove the check points immediately. Do you feel this situation would further affect the people of North?
A: De-securitizing is a systemic process and a very sensitive issue to the kind of history we have gone through. North and East have to return to normalcy like any other part of the country. If there is no threat to the national security it is only a political loss to keep such huge number of Army in one area.


Q:
How do you view the school drop outs in the North and East, as the recent statistics show an increase. Why do you think this situation has aroused?
A: Civil wars kill more civilians and destroy societies than Army camps. Both Tamils and Sinhalese have suffered due to a deep protracted war. Such war for 26 years was powerful enough to destroy every aspect of the social and cultural fabric of our society.


Tamils always valued education. They use education as their key social mobilization tool. In that sense a generation of school dropout is a sad and long-term impact bring negative deployment. That is the cost of war. That is why anyone should not to go to war. But having faced such fate, we need to seek newer mechanism to rectify. The Provincial Councils should be empowered to find solutions to the socio-economic conditions under which this occurs and remedy them. If so we should be able to overcome this by at least 5- 6 years from now.


Q:
It is understood that most of the war widows who are also breadwinners do not have adequate support to maintain their families. Funds allocated for them have not reached them properly. Do you feel they can expect for a positive change in future? What strategies do you think should be adopted to support them?
This is a deep and painful condition. I assume the new Parliament after May will empower a special North Development Process to address this devastating condition


Q:
How do you view the proceedings of the Missing Persons Commission? It is said that the new government would appoint their own independent commission to look into disappearances.
A: Reconciliation and rehabilitation has many facets. A Missing Persons Commission is a preconditions this includes the civilian, LTTE cadres, and State soldiers. A proper and thorough going mechanism needs to be funded and functioned.


Q:
How do you view the international probe on war crimes in Sri Lanka?
A: The Prime Minister has mentioned that he will engage with the UN body on this. Our eminent UN experts such as Dr. Jayantha Dhanapala and Dr. Radhika Coomarswamy are already engaging on this. We can engage and learn their concerns and help them with our own local investigations. This is what the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission also has recommended.


Q:
What method do you think should be adopted to overcome the land grabbing issues in the North and East?
A: Land is part of the heritage and part of the international law of right to live. The military or State sponsored business ventures all should stop the land grab or internal colonization at once without any conditions.


Q:
How do you see the political representation of the plantation Tamils in the presidential elections? Do you feel they adopted a crucial role to win over their rights?
A: The plantation Tamils are the most exploited and most neglected community. They should revolt against their current political leadership who has done next to nothing.
Recently 350 people were buried alive even then the plantation Tamil politicians who were part of the government failed to act. So my suggestion to them is to revolt nonviolently against your oppression, exploitation and the currently bondage they have kept you in. I think the total plantation Tamil population should rally around a party like JVP and make them their leaders.


Q:
Since you are more influenced by Buddhism. How would do you examine the problems caused by Buddhist extremism towards Muslims in past?
A: Political Buddhism and the Sangha social activism are my research interest at Oxford. Buddhism is part and parcel of the politics of this country since it arrived here. It has been the religions of the Courts and Sangha are advisers to the kings.


Q:
How do you view the 100 day programme of the new government? How do you feel this would benefit all minorities in general?
A: The 100 day program is well spelt out in the election manifesto. As regards to the Tamils I believe beside the general benefits, structural level benefits can start during this time. Removing the military governor and Provincial Chief Secretary in the North, lifting the travel ban, a process of releasing the political prisoner and rehabilitation for the LTTE cadres, starting to implement the 13A are all possible within 100 days. I think the government is serious. Appointing Justice K.Sripavan as Chief Justice is a clear signal in that direction.
 
.
Suddenly Sri Lanka has become good for US. How?
So do you want SL to be bad for US? Do you want US to continue on an anti SL stand. Remember SL is not china or Russia.
You mean they didn't like the fact that Sri Lanka wasn't their bitch
I think they did not like the fact that SL becoming their competitor’s bitch.
Let me tell you one thing, there is nothing called absolute sovereignty in this world. There is very few sovereign countries, less than the fingers in one hand. I would say. That is the geo politics and we have to understand that and play. Saying SL is becoming bitch to that and this shows your ignorance and misunderstanding of geo politics.
I also want SL to be strong enough to take a stand against those who target us. But one should be able to understand the capabilities of one and act accordingly. It is not rocket science SL cannot take on US, so we take a strategic retreat. That is not bitching but evading uncomfortable situation. We have one enemy and every one of us know that. And US is not our enemy. But we have to make sure, US is not supportive of our enemy.
Anyway US has once again showed that they do not care about anyone's humane rights. For the past 6 years they fought rigorously with SL gov. for the so called justice for the Tamil people. But within a month of the regime change they are ready to drop all charges against SL.
Of course US is not concerned about HR. And stand corrected US has not dropped any charges. But when people like you keep on saying US is ready to forget HR issues for the sake of geopolitics you are supporting the very forces that seek to have a bad SL-US relationship and gain advantages from it.
JR-Premadasa regime
JR is the best tactician we had. MR was a bit like that pre 2010. He lost it. I remember MR supporter Chandraprema (Gota’s war author) said JR was the best leader SL had.
If not JR managed the situation in 80s SL’s story would be different.
West didn't come to our market. We didn't won the West this time. Rather they won over us.
Let make sure who really won it? Whether west won over us or whether we won over west! Remember geo politics in the indian ocean will get tougher in the coming years. So US will not like to have an anti western SL and lets continue our friendly china policy….So US has the need to keep us in their circle. With US, economic opportunities will rise grab them.
At the same time lets take care of our strategic issues.
US interest do not tally with our own. That is what we need to keep remind ourselves
What is US interest and what is our interes? I think you have no idea of both..
The only reason AFAIK US has watered down the resolution is that UNP is in power
No watering down, just postponing. So don’t you like that?
Whether we like it or not we are part of the global power politics. There is no non-alignment style option today. We need to pick a side in order to survive
If US doesn’t treat us well, lets go with china…lets see whether current situation serves us…
We need to have a balanced foreign policy where much of the weight rest in Asia and Russia.
But you said previously non alignment style is not useful thesedays.
UNP has no alternative foreign policy other than siding with West. Their method of foreign policy has become pill for the all ills
Yes, UNP’s foreign policy has problems, especially with Mangala in it…let’s see how it goes. MR didn’t have a proper one either….
MR had a specific policy for SL when we were neglected and bullied on and it was the correct one. We need to increase our influence in the Asian region and we should search for new markets elsewhere other than the West
Yes we should strengthen our relationships with asian countries like china, iran and india..at the same time relationship with west has to be strengthened…...MR did not utilize the asian relationships properly. The needed technological transfer did not happen.
And most importantly we cant let US to back our enemies. We have to keep them in our side as well.
He let LTTE to rise and let the Tamil issue go out of control. He opened our market to the foreign products without protecting our own industries. The things that JR did for the country more harm than good.
JR did wrongs initially. There is no question about it..but to that man’s credit he managed it well later, especially indian part.
And open economy did gave a lot of positives. More new business ventures were opened with FDIs coming in when few local industries died out. JR’s error was not safeguarding the local industries….but still today what drives SL economy is JR’s decision those days.
Indira was driven to support LTTE because one for her personnel dislike of JR (JR has supported Indira's arch rival but didn't try to rectify the situation later when Indira was in power) and second for JR stupid foreign policy of siding with the West
No, there is a lot of reasons for india’s LTTE support. Contrary to popular belief indira is not the one who started contacts with LTTE, but Moraji Desai government.
JR stupid foreign policy of siding with the West
සයිඩින් විත් ද වෙස්ට් නෙමෙයි, ඉන්දියාවට එරෙහි වීම..මහින්දත් අන්තිමට කළේ ඒකනේ....මෙතන දඹදිව කාරයෝ ඉන්න හින්දා සිංහලෙන් කියන්නේ

they are willing to work with a democratic Southern government and that they are willing to forgive the past even the recent past during which the Tamil nation suffered limitlessly but work with the South as equal partners.
The tamils suffered due to their own tactics, especially their leaders. SL simply defended its territory. Not only they supported a war. So if they think they are blameless we cant expect a lot. Reconciliation is a two way process.

implementation of the 13th Amendment
Why is he forgetting SL had already implemented 13A?

As long as the majority Sinhalese are willing to accept that the Tamils are fully equal citizens and their collective political aspirations are a legitimate part of the State of Sri Lanka we can start working
This is a very clever statement. As individuals tamils enjoy equal rights. In SL no one is discriminated constitutionally..

Equality and their so called collective political aspirations are two different things.

If there is no threat to the national security it is only a political loss to keep such huge number of Army in one area
It is too soon to say there is no threat to national security.

Civil wars kill more civilians and destroy societies than Army camps
Yes but they did not have that problem when war was continuing

rehabilitation for the LTTE cadres, starting to implement the 13A are all possible within 100 days
Why does he forget SLG under MR rehabilitated and released 13000+ LTTE cadres? And that 13A is already implemented?
 
. .
So do you want SL to be bad for US? Do you want US to continue on an anti SL stand. Remember SL is not china or Russia.

Of course not. We first of all must understand why US has shifted it's stances against SL throughout the past 10-15 years. Without that knowledge we cannot argue what is happening. In the end what is evident is that US does not like that SL go in the direction that they do not like. Do we need to obey the US like some brainless zombies? At this very moment, people of SL should decide whether they should follow the instructions of the US or try to make their own independent path. We need not to become fully independent rough state per say but at least independence in certain subject that matters should be achieved.

Of course US is not concerned about HR. And stand corrected US has not dropped any charges. But when people like you keep on saying US is ready to forget HR issues for the sake of geopolitics you are supporting the very forces that seek to have a bad SL-US relationship and gain advantages from it.

US has postponed means in diplomatic terms is that they have dropped the charges against us for the time being. We do not need fyi bad SL-US ties. We are merely expressing our concerns. It is people like you that try to weigh down the gravity of the situation in favor of your own conclusions.

JR is the best tactician we had. MR was a bit like that pre 2010. He lost it. I remember MR supporter Chandraprema (Gota’s war author) said JR was the best leader SL had.
If not JR managed the situation in 80s SL’s story would be different.

JR was a brilliant tactician and strategist. There is no doubt about that. However I do not believe JR was the best leader we ever had. There are few others who are more fitting to the said title such as Lalith and MR. JR didn't manage the 80s. If he ever did Premadasa would not have said "dekona willakkuwa".

Let make sure who really won it? Whether west won over us or whether we won over west! Remember geo politics in the indian ocean will get tougher in the coming years. So US will not like to have an anti western SL and lets continue our friendly china policy….So US has the need to keep us in their circle. With US, economic opportunities will rise grab them.
At the same time lets take care of our strategic issues.

Don't just keep on telling just because of having good ties with the West would give us more opportunities to rise out of the misery. For 26-27 years from 1978-2005 we had good relations with US and the West altogether. Did we get any good opportunities to progress our country to the prosperity? No we didn't. The only thing that happened was West burying our country with lots of foreign debt and projects which didn't deliver what was originally intended.

If US doesn’t treat us well, lets go with china…lets see whether current situation serves us…

Enemy of my enemy is my friend. Very old saying. Read the art of war.

But you said previously non alignment style is not useful thesedays.

Balancing the foreign relations with much weight on Asia is not non alignment. By doing that we have selected Asia over the Europe and the US.

Yes, UNP’s foreign policy has problems, especially with Mangala in it…let’s see how it goes. MR didn’t have a proper one either….

MR was wrong so yahapalan should also be wrong. Nice theory.

Yes we should strengthen our relationships with asian countries like china, iran and india..at the same time relationship with west has to be strengthened…...MR did not utilize the asian relationships properly. The needed technological transfer did not happen.
And most importantly we cant let US to back our enemies. We have to keep them in our side as well.

Why the heck we need Iran for? By mentioning Asia I only referred to India, China, Russia, Japan, S.Korea, Taiwan and the SEA tiger countries.

Also what is this technological transfer? Please elaborate.


සයිඩින් විත් ද වෙස්ට් නෙමෙයි, ඉන්දියාවට එරෙහි වීම..මහින්දත් අන්තිමට කළේ ඒකනේ....මෙතන දඹදිව කාරයෝ ඉන්න හින්දා සිංහලෙන් කියන්නේ

Going against India meant siding with the West. That why India got over the edge and became hostile. Do not compare MR with JR. When JR was handling the situation India wasn't hostile towards us by very large degree. But what MR received was a already hostile India which has sided with SL Tamil cause. MR had to find something to balance out Indian threat and he did good by adopting the China policy. It was a wise move. Because of that India had to water down it's approach towards SL. Indian policy towards SL changed dramatically because of China. If not sure check S. Swami and his articles and debates in the TV..
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom