Saradiel
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2013
- Messages
- 1,302
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
How do you know what is a hoax and what is the truth? what sources do you have?8000 is a faux. Real count is more than 15000 were killed during the final phases of the war.
Two investigations revealed that the number of death is around 8000.
Then why did you say 15000 first and now by lakhs? Did you fail maths?By lakhs I actually meant the number of civilians killed including the past.
Who is justifying? First we dont consider it as a wrong. The only reason for civilian deaths is the LTTE.You cannot justify killing civilians in chunks stating LTTE had them as hostages.
SL had waged the same operation in East. But there was no cries about human rights bla bla when the operation in east was going on...why? because the top LTTE leader was not in East. The moment the offensive was turned against LTTE top level in wanni...they tried to show care for the 'civilians' .
Yes that is why 300000+ was saved. given food, medicine,temporary house to live....If your army really cared of Lankan Tamils they should have first saved the hostages before killing LTTE big heads.
Actually SLA has acted very much honourably than many armies.
SLA saved civilians at the cost of its soldiers...A fact acknowledged by ICRC as well.
If SLA did not care for civilians the war could have been finished with much less soldier casualty.
Read something before talking about it.
Do you understand that in a war, people die? And that there is a greater probability if one party held a human shield.They didn't do that but rather they found a chance to avenge their racist thoughts by killing the innocent hostages (Tamils).
The SLA protected the people that is why Mr.Idiot 300000+ people came alive to SL defence side.
SLA 's target was to kill the terrorists and they went for the kill.
Majority of tamils live in south. And if SL wanted to kill tamils, killing tamils in south is the best option. And they could have killed in Jaffna and in East...
When the so called own people are terrorists yes then it is correct. And i am extremely happy they killed them.. And i hope they had a painful death.When an army is killing its own people there is no difference between them and the LTTE.
All are the same, butchers.
Because idiot in a war collateral damage is common. Go and read the history or read anything on any war conducted in any part of the world. In all the wars, people die . No matter where it is in vietnam, or iraq or laos or cambodia or afganistan, in a war people die. That is why war is bad.Then why did civilians die in the final phases of the war ?
SL didnt wage war, SL defended a war to eradicate ruthless terrorists. A terrorism that ravaged the country and killed its people for 30 years. And yes SLA wont come back without killing the LTTE top brass.
SO you are now saying that there was no mass civilian deaths?300,000 survived. Do you think Sri Lanka would survive had these 300,000 been killed ?
small scale? LOL...There is the catch. It was targeted killing or a small-scale genocide.
Yes...we are the one to start a war..The war itself was used as a tool to eradicate Tamils by many in the Sri Lankan authority.
Yes then who told you?We do not need to any UN report to understand that.
No you seem like idiot of first orderDon't think of me as a Tamils or LTTE sympathizer.
And they forgot to butcher and viola 300000 came to SLA sideThey used the LTTE as a reason to butcher civilians
This thaniOruvan fellow comes with his nonsense in every SL thread and flees when the SLns here give a good kick in the butt. But wait some time and return with his nonsense again. I have answered this retard more than once..And i gave him to watch this.
After being kicked this fellow will once again come with his nonsense again.
Last edited: