South China Sea: CCTV reporter debates with American expert on the arbitration case

[Hamartia Antidote]

...was invited to debate with Daniel Wagner, CEO of Country Risk Solution.

"Country Risk Solutions"...another joke "expert" interview by RT. No wiki info..no history.

It doesn't even have an address on its website, http://countryrisksolutions.com/?page_id=21

The "whois" lists some apartment for Daniel Wagner.
https://whois.icann.org/en/lookup?name=countryrisksolutions.com

I think they just randomly flip through the phonebook and intentionally grab some nobody and make them sound important.

 

[BoQ77]

I think if China want to perform, they should have come to Hague few years ago for UNCLOS explanation.

Did Chinese just question a nobody and claim the victory? While they just suffered a legal loss in a professional court ?

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

I think if China want to perform, they should have come to Hague few years ago for UNCLOS explanation.

Did Chinese just question a nobody and claim the victory? While they just suffered a legal loss in a professional court ?

We're just not stupid enough to take our property to be put on public charity by some illegal court . Why we claim victory? because the court was doped by US on Behave of Philippe and Vietnam, so it's illegal and disqualify hence China declare itself as victorious

 

[S10]

I think if China want to perform, they should have come to Hague few years ago for UNCLOS explanation.

Did Chinese just question a nobody and claim the victory? While they just suffered a legal loss in a professional court ?

Professional court? It's about as professional as my S10 Court of Super Justice. By the way, you still haven't paid me the $200 dollar fine for wasting my time. The decision was binding.

 

[BoQ77]

You can't deny PCA is a professional one, recognized by China as participant.

 

[S10]

You can't deny PCA is a professional one, recognized by China as participant.

China never participated in any of its proceedings whether as a claimant or defendant. The only reason China even sent any representative is because it recognizes the Hague Convention, but not the authority of this kangaroo court. Not a single country has ever paid attention to its rulings.

The fine for you is now $300 dollars from my professional court. The decision is binding. You will ruin your reputation if you don't pay.

 

[William Hung]

The title sounded interesting until someone pointed out that RT invited someone with no education or experience in International Law and yet labelled him as an “expert” for the debate. Laughable.

IMHO, the CCTV reporter won hands down!

The so-called American expert doesn't know too much about the SCS situation. He keeps harping on the standard western narrative. He has no in depth understanding of UNCLOS.

Hi @ahojunk, it seems like you have an interest or knowledge in this legal case. Can you comment something on this thread I created:

https://defence.pk/threads/a-guide-...rness-of-the-scs-arbitration-tribunal.439784/


Looking forward to your inputs and knowledge. Cheers.

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

The title sounded interesting until someone pointed out that RT invited someone with no education or experience in International Law and yet labelled him as an “expert” for the debate. Laughable.

They usually pick "experts" from some "university" that either has degrees that are not recognized as legit or some tiny community college in the middle of nowhere that nobody has ever heard of.

 

[Tiger Genie]

South China Sea: CCTV reporter debates with American expert on the arbitration case

Published on 22 Jul 2016

Wang Guan, chief political correspondent at CCTV America, was invited to debate with Daniel Wagner, CEO of Country Risk Solutions, on the South China Sea arbitration ruling in RT’s program, Cross Talk, on Wednesday. Wang insisted that The Hague-based tribunal court “ruled on something that it has no jurisdiction to rule on based on a geopolitic side lawsuit filed by the Philippines against China.” He added that “the court ruled (on our) sovereignty in disguise of ruling on other things, which violated the spirit, if not the text, of UNCLOS.” Take a look at this heated debate.

--------------

IMHO, the CCTV reporter won hands down!

The so-called American expert doesn't know too much about the SCS situation. He keeps harping on the standard western narrative. He has no in depth understanding of UNCLOS.

China is setting a bad example by rejecting this verdict. They should learn to act like the big world power it aspires to become

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

China is setting a bad example by rejecting this verdict. They should learn to act like the big world power it aspires to become

Really??? we will let India to set a good example over Kashmir verdict and India will be admired by Chinese people as big world power as it aspire to become one

 

[TaiShang]

China is setting a bad example by rejecting this verdict. They should learn to act like the big world power it aspires to become

No, India got the title.

In fact, it has been one since 2012.

China is just a major developing nation.

Hence, it won't give up on sovereign rights.

 

[Tiger Genie]

Really??? we will let India to set a good example over Kashmir verdict and India will be admired by Chinese people as big world power as it aspire to become one

you can and are welcome to do that. Ofcourse when such example is set, it may be a pain that your iron brother Pakistan may not like. Are you sure you want to inflict such pain on Pakistan?

No, India got the title.

In fact, it has been one since 2012.

China is just a major developing nation.

Hence, it won't give up on sovereign rights.

the course just told you you have no basis for claiming sovereign rights there!

 

[Mangus Ortus Novem]

Why do the trouble makers from outside come and try to lecture China?

The oganised mob of the south never seems to stop. Why this obssession with China?

This only proves that China is doing the right thing. Keep going!

The Dragon is stirring, not even awake yet.

Imagine when the Dragon is fully awake... will we ever hear empty noises from the south?

 

[Zsari]

China is setting a bad example by rejecting this verdict. They should learn to act like the big world power it aspires to become

China is acting like "big world power", as that's what "big world power"do, rejecting arbitration..

 

[terranMarine]

China is setting a bad example by rejecting this verdict. They should learn to act like the big world power it aspires to become

By turning Caucasians into slaves?