Some nations misconstrue India's military modernisation: Antony

[Tin Man]

Ill say what no one here seems to be able to say. Its obviously an attempt to counter balance the chinese military superiority in the region. Everyone knows that and silently promotes it while restricting similiar attempts of procurement by pakistan. What the world doesnt realize yet is that, forcibly cornering and alienating someone often results in drastic measures from the victim without forethought . The results can be devastating.

 

[AMCA]

Ill say what no one here seems to be able to say. Its obviously an attempt to counter balance the chinese military superiority in the region. Everyone knows that and silently promotes it while restricting similiar attempts of procurement by pakistan. What the world doesnt realize yet is that, forcibly cornering and alienating someone often results in drastic measures from the victim without forethought . The results can be devastating.

Diplomacy is Not Designed for Results but Over results... India has Not been Threatening anyone, A request would Not shatter the Entire procurement agenda... A Tit-for-Tat is the Simple term which can be used to define the countermeasures taken to challenge the challenges Put forth by the Neighborhood.... How can it be devastating when The neighborhood by itself is Giving no room for each other to Grow Peacefully??? there needs to be space for an Explosion to take place, but at present its all vacuumed by Diplomacy and cheap politics...

 

[sensenreason]

He could've said India does not intend to use its weapons offensively, but what the heck does "for peaceful and non-violent" purposes mean?

I'd like to see Antony's non-violent bombs (no pun intended).

Antony is one of the leaders who will ensure large contracts are handed to foreign companies/countries and that indigenous defence development is at best limited in nature. He will also ensure Indian military is stays in its barracks even if Pak or China attacked some part of India.

Need I say more...

 

[Dash]

How the hell does this work? Military technology and non-violent purpose seems like an oxymoron.

There is a difference Cardsharp. The first need of military is defence and protection of the state. In that case its is not for violent and peaceful purpose. Can you say that every country keps a military to attack another country?, you cant. so its simple. and Antony means just that.

minimum deterrent is just that. Pak doesnt have the Nukes or China doesnt have the nukes or India to attack each other but to keep peace with each other. Just China having nukes doesnt maintain peace in this region.

So its peaceful purpose always unless you are attacked by anyone.

 

[Veeru]

He could've said India does not intend to use its weapons offensively, but what the heck does "for peaceful and non-violent" purposes mean?

I'd like to see Antony's non-violent bombs (no pun intended).

What is so hard to understand??????

India don't want to attack any country anywhere in the whole world.

But if we have got enough weapons and deterrence no one will dare to bully us or attack us.

In short there will be peace with India not war.

So our weapons are for non violent and peaceful purposes called deterrence.

 

[CardSharp]

There is a difference Cardsharp. The first need of military is defence and protection of the state. In that case its is not for violent and peaceful purpose. Can you say that every country keps a military to attack another country?, you cant. so its simple. and Antony means just that.

minimum deterrent is just that. Pak doesnt have the Nukes or China doesnt have the nukes or India to attack each other but to keep peace with each other. Just China having nukes doesnt maintain peace in this region.

So its peaceful purpose always unless you are attacked by anyone.

Ahhh and I was starting to wonder for whom such a stupid statement was written. Thank for you an post equally as non-nonsensical as the original statement.

 

[Hindutvadi]

How the hell does this work? Military technology and non-violent purpose seems like an oxymoron.

It works my friend...it works. That's why everybody name their forces as defence...not offence