Who gives a cahoot?
Public opinion becomes foreign policy. Friendship or not, it is important to be civil and well behaved.
The unresolved issues in East Asia is for Asians to settle. Insignificant Turks carry no weight here. In fact they carry no weight anywhere.
If you truly believe that people should stfu about the war, you are seriously mistaken and my opinion of you has fallen several notches.
My friend,
I can see that you are emotional in this post and I can empathize with your response, given the sensitive issue we are talking about. My response to Sinan was sincere and I mean this in regards to the political aspect. Whether you and I like it or not, we have to understand, to appreciate that there will always be politicization of events in the war to meet national agenda -- unfortunate as it may be.
The politicians in Japan have to invoke a sincere impression of what we Japanese refer to as "Naikan" 内観 -- which means "self looking" or what we in in the social sciences and managerial fields refer to as "Introspection". When i say introspection -- Japanese politicians have to address the following themes in context to Japanese national interest and our region: a) have there been enough financial reparations to afflicted party? b) has there been the adjudication of bilateral framework to address past grievances? c) has there been policies to increase people-to-people cultural and diplomatic exchange?
And when we see these themes -- or at least make a brief analysis -- and we will see that Japanese politicians from Katayama, to Yoshida, to Ikeda, Fukuda, Nakasone, Uno, Kaifu, Hata, Murayama, to Abe --- all have upheld these themes and have worked tirelessly to address them. In politics, nothing is black and white and one has to understand the factor of national interest and its role in gaining confidence within the constituency.These all influence their execution of their duties in the national and international sense.
Thanks,