What's new

Significant history of bangla's last Nabab facing treachury

.
hahahaha..... Famous Zahid Hamid

English had 3500 soldiers not 300 soldiers.. Siraj had 40,000 not 18000..

English won every battle in Indian subcontinent with similar odds after Palashi.

It was because unlike early Mogul and Turk, those Nawabs did not have professional full time soldiers. Rather they used to collect mecenery soldiers before going to war. On the other hand Clive had professional soldiers who came all the way from England.
 
.
Anyways, don't know about Hindustan but Bangladesh got whole lot of Mir Jaffar(Ghaddars) now a days(Awami league). They are willing to sell their mother to Hindustan to stay in power in Bangladesh.
 
.
hahahaha..... Famous Zahid Hamid

English had 3500 soldiers not 300 soldiers.. Siraj had 40,000 not 18000..

English won every battle in Indian subcontinent with similar odds after Palashi.

It was because unlike early Mogul and Turk, those Nawabs did not have professional full time soldiers. Rather they used to collect mecenery soldiers before going to war. On the other hand Clive had professional soldiers who came all the way from England.

I disagree with you about numbers. Nabab had around 20000 soldiers (Professional) english had 3000. Rest you made up.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom