What's new

Should ' West" be dropped from West Bengal ?

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
Personally I am against renaming states / Cities/ Towns but while reading a report on WB it occurred to me that calling the state ' West" Bengal is superfluous.

There is no ' East' Bengal anymore. At least the only East Bengal I know is a famed football club whom I was a great follower of - besides Mohammedan Sporting.

Why shouldn't " West" be dropped and the province be called Bengal ?

This may rankle people from BD as they consider themselves the custodians for Bengal .

May I have your views please ?

@nair @Nair saab @bongbang @Abingdonboy @Bang Galore @genmirajborgza786 @WAJsal @SpArK @levina @asad71
 
.
Bengal itself is not Indian in origin.

I don't know Bengali, but it should be Bangal or something.
 
. .
Personally I am against renaming states / Cities/ Towns but while reading a report on WB it occurred to me that calling the state ' West" Bengal is superfluous.

There is no ' East' Bengal anymore. At least the only East Bengal I know is a famed football club whom I was a great follower of - besides Mohammedan Sporting.

Why shouldn't " West" be dropped and the province be called Bengal ?

This may rankle people from BD as they consider themselves the custodians for Bengal .

May I have your views please ?

@nair @Nair saab @bongbang @Abingdonboy @Bang Galore @genmirajborgza786 @WAJsal @SpArK @levina
I'm not at all aware of the history of Bengal itself beyond that the partition divided it up (as was the case with other states).

Considering East Pakistan wasn't referred to as East Bengal then I'm not sure why West Bengal was called West Bengal in the first place when states like Punjab didn't resort to calling themselves "East Punjab" after partition.

I don't see any reason not to drop the "West" now and call it just Bengal now.


Again, I have little to no knowledge on these matters.
 
. . . .
I'm not at all aware of the history of Bengal itself beyond that the partition divided it up (as was the case with other states).

Considering East Pakistan wasn't referred to as East Bengal then I'm not sure why West Bengal was called West Bengal in the first place when states like Punjab didn't resort to calling themselves "East Punjab" after partition.

I don't see any reason not to drop the "West" now and call it just Bengal now.


Again, I have little to no knowledge on these matters.

Bengal was partitioned in 1905.

The provincial state of Bengal had an area of 189,000 miles2 and a population of nearly 8 crores (80 million). It included the Hindi-speaking regions of Bihar, the Odia-speaking regions of Odisha as well as the Assamese-speaking region of Assam, making it a huge administrative entity. Moreover, the capital Calcutta was the capital of the entireBritish India. With the growing efforts of the Indian National Congress to secure the independence of India, Lord Curzon decided to address both these problems by partitioning Bengal into two entities, which would result in a Muslim-majority in the eastern half, and a Hindu-majority in the western half.

The Partition of Bengal in 1905 was made on October 16 by Viceroy Curzon. The former province of Bengal was divided into two new provinces "Bengal" (comprising western Bengal as well as the province of Bihar and Orissa) and "East Bengal and Assam" with Dacca (Dhaka) being the capital of the latter.

Partition was promoted for administrative reasons: Bengal was as large as France but with a significantly larger population. Curzon stated the eastern region was neglected and under-governed. By splitting the province, an improved administration could be established in the east, where subsequently, the population would benefit from new schools and employment opportunities.

The partition was generally supported by the Muslims of East Bengal. Their support was motivated by both their poor economic conditions in East Bengal, as well as the perceived dominance of the Hindu businessmen and landlords in West Bengal over the governance of Bengal. Most of the factories and mills in Bengal were established in and around Calcutta, while many sources of raw materials for these factories were in East Bengal. Furthermore, most of the educational institutions of the Province were situated in Calcutta – including the lone university in Bengal.

Due to these political protests, the two parts of Bengal were reunited in 1911. A new partition which divided the province on linguistic, rather than religious grounds followed, with the Hindi, Oriya and Assamese areas separated to form separate administrative units: Bihar and Orissa Province was created to the west, and Assam Province to the east. The administrative capital of British India was moved from Calcutta to New Delhi as well.

@asad71 .. You may like to add to this please.
 
.
Personally I am against renaming states / Cities/ Towns but while reading a report on WB it occurred to me that calling the state ' West" Bengal is superfluous.

There is no ' East' Bengal anymore. At least the only East Bengal I know is a famed football club whom I was a great follower of - besides Mohammedan Sporting.

Why shouldn't " West" be dropped and the province be called Bengal ?

This may rankle people from BD as they consider themselves the custodians for Bengal .

May I have your views please ?

@nair @Nair saab @bongbang @Abingdonboy @Bang Galore @genmirajborgza786 @WAJsal @SpArK @levina @asad71

What difference does it make????? The people and the geography is going to be the same.......

Madras = Chennai
Bombay = Mumbai
Bangalore = Bengalooru

Does the above changes made any difference to the people living there??? Afaik "NO"
 
. . . . .
Thanks .

Will appreciate if you could tag more Bongs - from BD too. I tried looking for as may as I could.

To be frank i have no clue about the state of Indian posters here (barring malayali's) Since sarthak had "ganguli," i guessed it..... and if i am not mistaken @scorpionx is another bengali i have noticed....
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom