What's new

Should we involve with Mig also for our second 5th gen light fighter.

Perpendicular

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
871
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
Australia
MIG corp: We've started to develop 5-gen light fighters based on MIG-35 & 1.44 Draft to show RuAF within months
IMG_20150822_204730.jpg
 
India is working on its own version, design and specification with the help of israel
 
MIG corp: We've started to develop 5-gen light fighters based on MIG-35 & 1.44 Draft to show RuAF within months
View attachment 249207
The Russians are no longer a reliable option- look how much they are messing around on the FGFA project, why throw even more good money after bad?

IF India wants a foreign player involved in the AMCA then go with the French, Israelis or Japanese.

Looking at the status of all other options, it seems likely that IAF may want to get involved in this program.
Nonsense.
 
India wanted to join PAKFA project right in the designing phase to get experience is designing 5th gen aircraft but was unable to do so because by the time India was offered joint development, PAKFA primary design had already been frozen.

This could provide another chance for that and also to suss out J 20 which is also based on the same primary design.
 
like SU-30 and mig 29 combo, IAF is likely to have FGFA+AMCA or T-50 +Mig 1.44

it looks same almost.....
J-20-Mig-144.jpg
 
No,
But we should order another 30 Mig29Ks

They will cost barely 1.2 Billion USD,
And will allow IAF to withdraw 35 Su30MKI aircrafts currently deployed for Maritime strike role and deploy them in the north east
 
No,
But we should order another 30 Mig29Ks

They will cost barely 1.2 Billion USD,
And will allow IAF to withdraw 35 Su30MKI aircrafts currently deployed for Maritime strike role and deploy them in the north east
Mig 29k is not a match for su30mki
 
Mig 29k is not a match for su30mki

And where is he comparing two? Does maritime strikes more important to you than NE region where threat is real? Mig 29k is made to perform in maritime role while Sukhoi is True air superiority fighter and multi role. Its capability is getting wasted in maritime role.We really need more mig 29 k for navy.

And ontopic ridiculous we are having trouble with PAKFA and people wants to bring in Mig too especially when we are already committed to AMCA.
 
And where is he comparing two? Does maritime strikes more important to you than NE region where threat is real? Mig 29k is made to perform in maritime role while Sukhoi is True air superiority fighter and multi role. Its capability is getting wasted in maritime role.We really need more mig 29 k for navy.

And ontopic ridiculous we are having trouble with PAKFA and people wants to bring in Mig too especially when we are already committed to AMCA.
MKI is a heavy duty multi role aircraft with balence shifter to air to air mode,and maritime strike is also very important one since sea routes are the gate way of ours and our two important enemies.Now lets come to mig 29k and MKI both are using same kh series cruise missiles for anti shipping role,in this scenario MKI's powerful radar and its range of detection,aircraft's combat range will clearly beat 29k. Only area where mig is having advantage over MKI is later can't operate from India's present aircraft carrier.

Now we are in position to design and develop our own aircraft so better to concentrate on AMCA instead of going behind mig1.44.
 
yes Su 30mki is the super man of fighter aircrafts lets fill all squadrons with it :tup:
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom