Maybe you should stop calculating and just google exact numbers. You are probably using debt in danish currency (kr) and GDP in US dollars.
2022
Denmark debt to GDP ratio 30.1%
Turkey debt to GDP ratio 31.7%
Should we accept Sweden into NATO?
- Thread starter dBSPL
- Start date
2022
Denmark debt to GDP ratio 30.1%
Turkey debt to GDP ratio 31.7%
BHAN85
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2015
- Messages
- 3,711
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Everybody is saying the same here, even the Turkiye loyal friends, it's obvious.
Turkiye is squeezing NATO rich members to make juice and get money.
Turkiye also refused Finland in the first time, and then they changed their opinion? Why? Money talks
.
BHAN85
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2015
- Messages
- 3,711
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Doing blackmail to "allies" to get money is not a nice thing to say it openly.
So states use a diplomatic language plenty of euphemisms and excuses.
But in the end, that's called blackmail and extortion to get money.
If support PKK nutjobs is the real reason, then they should say before and ask stop support them or leave NATO.
But what they really want is money, money, money.
And it's perfect. And well done, if you make an alliance, you should help your allies to develop themselves and dont ignore them.
So states use a diplomatic language plenty of euphemisms and excuses.
But in the end, that's called blackmail and extortion to get money.
If support PKK nutjobs is the real reason, then they should say before and ask stop support them or leave NATO.
But what they really want is money, money, money.
And it's perfect. And well done, if you make an alliance, you should help your allies to develop themselves and dont ignore them.
Foinikas
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
- Messages
- 12,710
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Since the dawn of humanity,various people of different races,nations,countries,religions,cultures and occupations have tried to discuss and exchange opinions with MMM-E. They have all failed.
It is either "Turkey is the best and you all suck" or nothing.
It is either "Turkey is the best and you all suck" or nothing.
MMM-E
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 12,720
- Reaction score
- -44
- Country
- Location
Everybody is saying the same here, even the Turkiye loyal friends, it's obvious.
Turkiye is squeezing NATO rich members to make juice and get money.
Turkiye also refused Finland in the first time, and then they changed their opinion? Why? Money talks
what a silly troll team
source = your arse as always
liar clowns ... same users with different false flager accounts
since 2013 IMF wants to give money to Turkiye ..but ERDOGAN says NO
even Turkiye is the best donor country in the world to compare with GDP
between 2010 and 2022 , Turkiye spend $100 billion for humanitarian aid to other muslim countries
what about your trash countries Greece-Spain ? nothing
Last edited:
BON PLAN
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2016
- Messages
- 1,767
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
The problem is that Turkey is on a track to only have defense industry and tourism.
And in the same time more and more turkish peoples are starving...
>60% inflation rate.
Good job Edo !
Classical islamist fake news.
Just for your information, when the french secured Algeria from the arabs, there was no road, no hospital, some dust made harbors.
When we leave, all that is already in the country was made by the french. And we didn't destroyed it in 1962.
We already have christians to help, mainly hurt by muslims terrorists, so don't expect us to help muslim countries.
Coming from a German it is funny.
Last edited:
Sweden
Sweden is irrelevant on the Big ChessBoard
the Rasputin of Washington, a Pole who hated Russia with all his soul ...
en.m.wikipedia.org
... said that Ukraine was the important thing
Sweden is irrelevant on the Big ChessBoard
the Rasputin of Washington, a Pole who hated Russia with all his soul ...
Zbigniew Brzezinski - Wikipedia
... said that Ukraine was the important thing
...
Let us recall once again the conversation that brought the Cold War to an end.
There is an English version and there is another one in Russian.
The version I have read is the English version which is accessible at the National Security Archive at Georgetown University.
(This version has paragraphs crossed out from when the document was declassified. Those who have read the Russian version say that the English version kept in Washington contains the essentials. And indeed, the gist of the conversation that ended the Cold War is very well understood.):
-If we leave Germany then Germany would be a sovereign country and could develop the Atomic Bomb, so we might as well stay and ...
"if we stay in a Germany that is part of NATO NATO will not advance an inch to the East."
-All right, said the Russian
(A French historian asked the Russian at the end of his days how he could be so naive, and he answered: -I thought I was among normal people)
Let us recall once again the conversation that brought the Cold War to an end.
There is an English version and there is another one in Russian.
The version I have read is the English version which is accessible at the National Security Archive at Georgetown University.
(This version has paragraphs crossed out from when the document was declassified. Those who have read the Russian version say that the English version kept in Washington contains the essentials. And indeed, the gist of the conversation that ended the Cold War is very well understood.):
-If we leave Germany then Germany would be a sovereign country and could develop the Atomic Bomb, so we might as well stay and ...
"if we stay in a Germany that is part of NATO NATO will not advance an inch to the East."
-All right, said the Russian
(A French historian asked the Russian at the end of his days how he could be so naive, and he answered: -I thought I was among normal people)
Ich
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2018
- Messages
- 2,541
- Reaction score
- -26
- Country
- Location
there are still some real germans in germany...
Above I have quoted from memory, the words according to the document we can access at Georgetown University's National Security Archive
Baker: Germany could be a sovereign country
Gorvachev: yes ... "The German question is the key question, it is critical to the Poles"
Baker: "That's right"
Gorvachev: (Blank paragraph, deleted, censored)
Baker: "If we maintain a presence in a Germany that is part of NATO, there would be no extension of NATO one inch to the East"
Baker: Germany could be a sovereign country
Gorvachev: yes ... "The German question is the key question, it is critical to the Poles"
Baker: "That's right"
Gorvachev: (Blank paragraph, deleted, censored)
Baker: "If we maintain a presence in a Germany that is part of NATO, there would be no extension of NATO one inch to the East"
...
Bonus Track
nsarchive.gwu.edu
Bonus Track
NATO's Original Purpose: Double Containment of the Soviet Union and "Resurgent" Germany | National Security Archive
Washington, D.C., December 11, 2018 – In the Fall of 1966, as part of an ongoing debate about the U.S. troop presence in Western Europe and the role of NATO during the Cold War, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara sent an illuminating memo to President Lyndon B. Johnson to explain the...
nsarchive.gwu.edu
Similar threads
- Article
- Article
- Article
