Should Taiwan Have Built Nuclear Weapons to Deter China?
Or would the presence of nuclear weapons have instigated a Chinese attack?
by Kyle Mizokami
Here's What You Need to Remember: This could have been used to threaten Beijing directly, trading the destruction of one government for another, and would have been a more useful deterrent. Still, the 1,800-mile distance it would take to deliver a nuke on Beijing was at the time as insurmountable as the Taiwan Strait itself.
SPONSORED CONTENT
Recommended by
What Might an Israel-Iran War Look Like?Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies
Celeb Couples with Major Age DifferencesFamilyMinded
‘Iron Man’-Inspired ‘Razor House’ Sells for $20.8 MillionMansion Global
It would have been one of the greatest crises of postwar Asia: the revelation of a Taiwanese atomic bomb. For Taiwan, the bomb would have evened the odds against a numerically superior foe. For China, a bomb would have been casus belli, justification for an attack on the island country it considered a rogue province. Active from the 1960s to the 1980s, Taipei’s efforts to develop nuclear weapons were finally abandoned due to diplomatic pressure by its most important ally, the United States.
Taiwan’s nuclear program goes back to 1964, when the People’s Republic of China tested its first nuclear device. The test was not exactly a surprise to outside observers, but it was still Taiwan’s nightmare come true. Chinese and Taiwanese air and naval forces occasionally skirmished, and it threatened to turn into all-out war. Suddenly Taipei was confronted with the possibility that such a war could turn nuclear. Even just one nuclear device detonated on an island the size of Maryland would have devastating consequences for the civilian population.
Recommended: North Korea Has 200,000 Soldiers in Its Special Forces
Recommended: Why Doesn't America Kill Kim Jong Un?
SPONSORED CONTENT
Recommended by
Tel Aviv Surgeon: Easy Method Relieves Tinnitus (Ear Ringing)healths.vip
Jeff Bezos Drops $16 Million on Another Manhattan Pad to Create a ‘Vertical’ Dream HomeMansion Global
חווית קנייה באונליין
קנה עכשיו
₪ 2628 - מחשב נייח הכולל מעבד i5-10400 Intel, זכרון 8GB, כונן 240GB SSD, לוח Asus, מסך...www.ivory.co.il
Recommended: 1.2 Million Casualties: If North Korea Attacked Los Angeles with a Nuclear Weapon
From Taiwan’s perspective, a nuclear arsenal would be the ultimate guarantor of national sovereignty. Even if the United States split with the country, as it eventually did, Taiwanese nukes would keep the Chinese People’s Liberation Army at bay, a deterrent not only against Chinese nuclear power, but against conventional forces as well. In hindsight, this would have had a good chance of success, as North Korea’s own procurement of nuclear weapons has made the United States and South Korea reluctant to retaliate over the country’s various military provocations.
SPONSORED CONTENT
Recommended by
Murdoch buys the priciest home in U.S. history for $150 millionMansion Global
Turkey's Air Force: Flying into the Abyss?BESA Center for Strategic Studies
אל תוציאו תוציאו דרכון אירופאי לפני שתראו את המחירים לשנת 2021דרכון אירופאי| מודעות חיפוש
The Taiwanese bomb program began in 1967, using the Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology’s Institute for Nuclear Energy Research as a cover. In 1969, Canada sold the country a heavy-water nuclear research reactor as a prelude to what it hoped were commercial energy-producing reactor sales—none too soon, as the Trudeau government recognized the People’s Republic of China in 1970. The reactor, known as the Taiwan Research Reactor, went critical in 1973, and Taiwan set about creating a stockpile of weapons-grade plutonium.
Taiwan’s nuclear program was under careful surveillance by the United States, which recognized Taiwan as the rightful Chinese government and protected the country from the mainland. Still, Washington was afraid a Taiwanese bomb would unnecessarily enrage China, and by 1966 took steps to prevent the bomb from happening. Washington ensured that Taiwanese reactors fell under International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines, which would prevent diversion of nuclear fuel for the purposes of building a weapon.
But the entire point of the program was to build a weapon, and it was inevitable that Taiwan would be caught in the act. In 1975, the CIA reported, “Taipei conducts its small nuclear program with a weapon option clearly in mind, and it will be in a position to fabricate a nuclear device after five years or so.” At this point, the United States, Germany, France, Norway and Israel had all supplied assistance. The program had procured heavy water from America and uranium from South Africa.
In 1976–77, the IAEA inspected the activities at the military-run Institute for Nuclear Energy Research. The IAEA discovered discrepancies in the Taiwanese program, and in 1976, the United States protested the nuclear-weapons program. In response, the island government promised to
Should Taiwan Have Built Nuclear Weapons to Deter China?
Or would the presence of nuclear weapons have instigated a Chinese attack?
nationalinterest.org