Should Pakistan go with ICBMs after NATO strike

[1ndy]

Tera Gujraaty bhai loge tera pyaar ki daam de deya!

konsi bhasa bola bhai???

 

[NirmalKrish]

we need hearts and minds and balls agreed.

But we need equipment too,
Holy Prophet said always be prepared for your defense against enemies ,

Against these enemy ICMBS are must , whole world is making them even poor India has made why shouldn't we.
I would even say make H-Bomb why should we let ourselves down in science/defense.

Cannot help but bring India into the equation can you, refereeing India as POOR nation who are you kidding? fix your own garden before commenting on your neighbor’s your economy is in tatters and living off funding from international aid your defense budget makes up for almost half of your GDP, for god sakes grow up & get yourself educated and vent your spleen on the America’s for this one and not us.

 

[Mytime]

Which Nato country will you target the ICBMs at ... even friendly countries like Turkey are involved in the NATO would you target them too ? It will create more troubles to Pakistan at an international level , ICBMs surely would be for the purpose to deter uncle sam but will they take it for granted and allow Pakistan to aim its nuclear tipped ICBMs at them ... India would be happy but not sure if the west would allow that to happen

 

[regular]

when did Iran scare the **** out of the US, please stop believing what you read on this forum, the reality is quite different. The Iran issue is way more complex that what most Pakistan pan it out to be.

---------- Post added at 09:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:34 AM ----------



sure bomb Canada as well, just dont hit my city

Oh! don't worry we care about our internet friends......

 

[MZUBAIR]

Even if they[PAK GOV & MILTARY] have something more then ICBM, all would be useless .....coz the men behind those have a CAT heart.....

 

[NirmalKrish]

U know if the ICBM is intercepted on the Atlantic ocean then the Tsunami will overrun the whole NY state, Washington DC, Masacussets , Virginia state . I mean the states touching the Atlantic ocean will be completely under water...If U are in NY then U will be under water and can't use ure internet, sorry for that..... Plues we will make sure that the speed of our ICBM will supercede the speed of the mid coarse interceptors so that they be litterally unstoppabe by any defence shield......Insha-Allah.....
Russia already made it , "their Missile Iskander" and we working on it.... We will test it when we will require it to show the world....Insha-Allah.......

YOU RUSSIA HAS BECOME YOUR BEST Friends that they will give you acess to this tech is it? since when?

 

[SpArK]

YOU RUSSIA HAS BECOME YOUR BEST Friends that they will give you acess to this tech is it? since when?

After the army exercise we have with them. They have some spare time in between to disclose those secrets.

 

[OrionHunter]

TARGETS? Would Pakistan target cities such as New York, Washington DC, etc? Or target American assets closer home? If so, what would be the need for a horrendously expensive ICBM program?

Can Pakistan produce an ICBM with a range of 13,000 km + to reach mainland America? That'll take another decade or two at least.

COST? $30 billion for a modest ICBM arsenal. Where's the dough gonna come from?

RETALIATION. Would the US of A wait for a Pakistani nuke strike? In a decade they'd be having space based satellite laser designated systems that would be able to destroy any missile at any point in their trajectory. And what will become of Pakistan in a nuke retaliatory strike? (India and neighboring countries of South Asian would probably be devastated too due to radio active fallout!)

China will not be able to help either monetarily or by transferring ICBMs to Pakistan due to the MTCR regime. And being a signatory to the NPT it cannot transfer any weapon grade nuclear material to another country.

So the question, "Should Pakistan go with ICMBs after NATO strike?" is hypothetical at best and doesn't stand scrutiny.

 

[Juice]

I guess U need to check the world map and see what states of US are touching the Atlantic ocean then U will know what I mean.....

An earthquake off the coast of Japan caused a wave to go some miles inland, the eastern states are more than a few miles deep, and an earthquake is SLIGHTLY more energetic than a nuke...

 

[pakistanitarzan]

All of you guys living in fancy land, the distance between Pakistan and US is 12,000 km roughly and the closest thing Pakistan has
is Shaheen 3 which can cover a distance of 5,000 km roughly. 12k - 5k = 7k more needed is not a joke

To make a ICBM which can cover 12,000 km, Pakistan need another decade!

 

[Mytime]

The US can only theorically intercept the ICBM on the paper, but never got succeeded in any of the practises.

Pakistan can theoretically create an ICBM of 13k range... practically it will take another 20 yrs for them to develop it

 

[MZUBAIR]

All of you guys living in fancy land, the distance between Pakistan and US is 12,000 km roughly and the closest thing Pakistan has
is Shaheen 3 which can cover a distance of 5,000 km roughly. 12k - 5k = 7k more needed is not a joke

To make a ICBM which can cover 12,000 km, Pakistan need another decade!

To make NUKE, PAK needs 100 more years......said by some one of ur country in 1998.

---------- Post added at 06:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:17 AM ----------

Pakistan can theoretically create an ICBM of 13k range... practically it will take another 20 yrs for them to develop it

lolz... funny

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Pakistan does not have knowledge to build ICBM, they got missile technology enough to counter India. China will not share ICBM technology with them.

You can build it, but it will take time.

Are you kidding me?

What will be the loss for China of letting Pakistan to have the ICBMs?

The only thing that we are worried about is the US spies and the traitors within the Pakistani government.

 

[patna_ke_presley]

To make NUKE, PAK needs 100 more years......said by some one of ur country in 1998.

---------- Post added at 06:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:17 AM ----------



lolz... funny

But SUPARCO could not develop a rocket even in 50 years. They are still struggling.

 

[regular]

An earthquake off the coast of Japan caused a wave to go some miles inland, the eastern states are more than a few miles deep, and an earthquake is SLIGHTLY more energetic than a nuke...

So this means that We have to show u practically that our Nukes can realli create tsunami that can overrun ure Atlantic ocean/seaside states???....okay I'm not telling u to believe us/me what I'm saying but when is gonna happen then U will see it by ureself.Just wait a little bit for us to do it practically......