Water Car Engineer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2010
- Messages
- 13,313
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Makes your own off of experience from G3. Turks have done it with their new rifle.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Saudis use AK-103I vote Ak 103 with UBGL.
We should test Turkish GunThe M4 isn't adequate as a battle rifle for Pakistan Army needs. It's great for spec ops, the SSG already has plenty of them, but for a battle rifle something along the lines of HK 417 or one of the newer AK models is more suitable.
G3M is also lighter, shorter and has an upgraded gas operating system. Pakistan would like to retain the 7.62mm round. If we decide to replace almost a million rifles, they must offer a clear advantage over the existing rifle.
Saudis and Al QassamSaudis use AK-103
We should test Turkish Gun
M4 is suitable for Spc Ops units but not as an infantry rifle. The US Army has had trouble with these rifles in the field as well as with the 5.56mm round.
Pakistan should go for license production of HK-417A2 or FN-SCAR-H for the long term replacement of G-3 battle rifles as well as the MG-5 aka HK-121 to replace the old MG-3.
I suggest this one It's the Serbian zastava m21 has 3 variants this one can a good replacement for the m4 if not available and its for sure better than the G3 plus cheap and you can mass produce it localy.
My answer is no, i will like improved AK-47 (AK-103, AK-12) rather then all modern rifle. AK is the " lord of war "
is Pakistan looking to sell their old weapons with new M4s? I think USA should give away free of cost M-16s A1-A2-A3-A4s to Pakistan Police along with other guns and ammo.
So then why not M-16s from Iraq n Afghans?American Infantry weapons in Afghanistan are being given to the Afghans.
Unless you can entice an American Politician, forget about them.
So then why not M-16s from Iraq n Afghans?