Sheikh Mujib brutality

[Contrarian]

One need only to look at recent events, and how much influence India has in BD to know the truth, I care little for what people think, all I care about are facts.

Which recent events and which facts?

We have had a military dictatorship before, we've had rigged elections before, we've even forced re-elections before. So why this time is it an Indian win?

Every government in Bd has had excellent relations with India. The fact is none before AL had the nerve to take India to court over a 25 year old matter. Our chief investor today is China, Indias regional rival.

I suspect the only relationship with India that would not be suspicious to some is war. I'm sorry it isn't a them or us scenario.

Unfortunately, Pakistan gets most of it's info on Bd from jamaati sources. Again I have to ask you to stand back and look at the facts without prejudice.

That Guy you apparently have a very typical Pakistani mindset that India having influence in Bangladesh is necessarily negative. Or that it means Bangladesh is servile to India or that India is out to take over Bangladesh.

Yes, India does have big influence in Bangladesh...so what? We are neighbours. We have no major dispute between us. That is how it should be. Bangladesh also has enormous influence over sections of Indian populace (being countries of different size means influence can not be equal).

West Bengalis for example are utterly loath if GoI does anything that might harm Bangladeshis. They consider them very close. Heck Mamata, who plays political games with GoI also bends when she is told if any of her step might harm Bangladesh.

Now should we start crying foul that BD exercises enormous influence over the people of West Bengal and Tripura? No.

They take care of our concerns and we take care of their concerns. Since the proof of pudding lies in eating -
In example - In the final land border settlement with Bangladesh, India is giving away an additional 10,000 acres of land to Bangladesh instead of an equal land swap. This was huge news in India. The deal has been signed between GoI and GoB. It now needs to be ratified by Indian Parliament to come into force.

We would never do this for Pakistan, it would be downright unthinkable..but we have for Bangladesh. Please stop looking at things from a Pakistani perspective.

 

[American Pakistani]

Liaqat Ali Khan, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Zia-ul-Haq all were killed. So, what is your point?

Zulfiqar A Bhutto was prosecuted whereas Zia ul Haq died in a plane crash.

Liaquat Ali Khan was assassinated not by a Pakistani national but an Afghan national who was professional assassin.

Kindly learn some facts before posting.

 

[Hiptullha]

Sheikh Mujib started a great job by eliminating leftist terrorists clan. But he should have properly destroyed the jamaat clan too.
If he had done his job properly then ISI,CIA sponsored jamaat brethren fraction group from Army could never kill our great leader.
History always praises our great leaders like Siraj ud daula who had lacking in many ways but its the Mir zafars who we hate.

Haha, it was his authoritarian method of removing leftist terrorist groups which brought his demise. Gave Jamatis cannon fodder. You can't stir a revolution when the leader is a fair, honest and tolerant man.

 

[dray]

Maybe it's time for Bangladesh to give Jamatis one way ticket to their real homeland they desire so much to live in!!

 

[Pakistani shaheens]

Hope all Muslims in this world unites.

 

[khair_ctg]

That is the problem, you read it but are you capable of comprehending it? Maybe the authors below will explain it better.


Conflict in East Pakistan
Authors:
[1] Edward S. Mason, Lamont University Professor Emeritus, Harvard University.
[2] Robert Dorfman, Professor of Economics, Harvard University.
[3] Stephen A. Marlin, Professor of Economics Harvard University
Some excerpts:

The basic facts seem to support the East Pakistani charge of economic domination by the West. The economic disparities between East and West Pakistan have been so serious for so long that the Pakistan Government's highest planning authority has been forced to take official not of them...

East Pakistan blame three instruments of the Central Government for their plight:-

1. Pakistan's scant investible resources, plus foreign aid, are directed unduly to the development of West Pakistan - to the comparative neglect of East Pakistan
2. In particular, East Pakistan's foreign trade earning are diverted to finance imports for West Pakistan.
3. Economic policy favors West Pakistan at the expense of East Pakistan. Specifically, tariffs, import controls, and industrial licensing compel East Pakistan to purchase commodities from West Pakistan which, but for the controls could be obtained more cheaply in world markets.

View attachment 45922

Does that make it clearer? Your razakar mullahs have been lying to you and selling you out.

are you realizing the irregularity in what you are saying? you admit it yourself that East Pakistan landmass started from a dismal socio-economic condition in 1947. on top of that, the class warfare leftists (that you probably cheer for) made sure the business-owning class, which includes both non-Bengali Partition migrants and Bengalis, increasingly settled in Karachi rather than in Dhaka or Chittagong, through cultural and economic agitation.

it shouldn't come as a surprise that capital was flowing through migrant non-Bengalis or from West Pakistan. and the Bengali nationalist leftists made sure WP was where the people increasingly settled at and where the capital returned to. apart from the agitation, this is a very familiar thing that exists in all countries, provinces, etc. Dhaka attracts more capital than Chittagong. Karachi attracts more than Rawalpindi. Texas attracts more than Oklahoma. that is what you think "neglect" is and enough justification for the "neglected" region to be annexed by enemy country.

you are missing how the market works. West Pakistan was economically doing better because WP businesses had the intellectual and physical resources to create jobs in both WP and EP. Mohajir and well-off Bengali business class found WP increasingly more attractive in part because of Bengali nationalist agitators in EP. any parity would have to only come in time when East Pakistani Bengalis would attain the intellectual wealth and capital that they were deprived of during Hindu-dominated pre-1947, to have created jobs in West Pakistan.

to 2. political rhetoric. to 3. so suddenly sourcing domestically is wrong?

Sheikh Mujib was a "razakar mollah"

 

[Mattrixx]

What was the Bangladeshi/Pakistani GDP in 1972-1975 and what was it in 2013? Was the gap bigger in 1972 or in 2013.

Source of the above data can be found here: List of countries by past and future GDP (nominal) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pakistan is 6 time bigger than Bangladesh. So 1:1.5 ratio is a great achievement for Bangladesh by 2014, in Pakistan context. In the future gap will be more narrow.

So Lets talk about Indian GDP vs Pakistan GDP. Where India is only 4 times bigger from Pakistan. But Indian GDP is now over trillions. Where they started same.

@Contrarian

 

[idune]

Maybe it's time for Bangladesh to give Jamatis one way ticket to their real homeland they desire so much to live in!!

Sounds like desperate indian. People who do Jamaat politics are Bangladeshis and they have every right like any other Bangladeshis. Indians dictating who is Bangladeshi and who should go where is way out of your space. That being said exposure of Sheik Mujib brutality is shaking core of indo Awami business of creating division in Bangladesh since 1971. India justifies its interference though this division and its subservient Awami class which work for indian division tactics.

Pakistan is 6 time bigger than Bangladesh. So 1:1.5 ratio is a great achievement for Bangladesh by 2014, in Pakistan context. In the future gap will be more narrow.

So Lets talk about Indian GDP vs Pakistan GDP. Where India is only 4 times bigger from Pakistan. But Indian GDP is now over trillions. Where they started same.

@Contrarian

Moderators, please note blatant attempt to hijack the thread with off topic discussion.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Pakistan is 6 time bigger than Bangladesh. So 1:1.5 ratio is a great achievement for Bangladesh by 2014, in Pakistan context. In the future gap will be more narrow.

So Lets talk about Indian GDP vs Pakistan GDP. Where India is only 4 times bigger from Pakistan. But Indian GDP is now over trillions. Where they started same.

@Contrarian

What ? Pakistans population :180+ million
indias population = 1.25+ billion

Bangladesh?

 

[Cyberian]

Pakistan is 6 time bigger than Bangladesh. So 1:1.5 ratio is a great achievement for Bangladesh by 2014, in Pakistan context. In the future gap will be more narrow.

So Lets talk about Indian GDP vs Pakistan GDP. Where India is only 4 times bigger from Pakistan. But Indian GDP is now over trillions. Where they started same.

@Contrarian

India has a 1.27 billion population and Pakistan has 185 million people, almost 7 times bigger than Pakistan.

India Population 2014 | Current population of India

What is Bangladesh's population?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

 

[khair_ctg]

Pakistan is 6 time bigger than Bangladesh. So 1:1.5 ratio is a great achievement for Bangladesh by 2014, in Pakistan context. In the future gap will be more narrow.

So Lets talk about Indian GDP vs Pakistan GDP. Where India is only 4 times bigger from Pakistan. But Indian GDP is now over trillions. Where they started same.

@Contrarian

i'm mesmerized how you seamlessly blend your undying love to cheer for India with bits of numbers here and there. Pakistan and Bangladesh both are supposed to lag behind India with their moth-eaten hinterlands, and even if India did not annex one of the Muslim states in 1971. but that is arguably not the case

 

[Chak Bamu]

Gents please stick to topic. This thread is not about Pakistan. OT will be deleted and the concerned member shall be warned.

 

[dray]

View attachment 46082

What is that? A fantasy map?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

What is that? A fantasy map?

Whatever makes you happy little man.