Mr INDIAN, I would like to clear few things here, that is, I was the man who always supported the ‘cause’, 9/11 2001, of ongoing war in Afghanistan. I always supported US and her allies for their war in Afghanistan if they were intended to remove the bases of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan which may again pose a threat to their security and may result in 9/11 type of attack in West again
.
I used to make few points as below:
1st ,
US did a mistake when they trained Al Qaeda and Taliban militants against SU and then they left that place as it is which then destabilized this region. I also blame them for the over 20,000 deaths in Indian Kashmir due to flow of those militants like Ilyas Kashmiri who got training from CIA/ ISI to fight against SU in Afghan in 80s and then many of them like Ilyas Kashmiri came to Indian Kashmir since 1990, till then Kashmir was one of the peaceful region of the world. And I blame ‘only’ US/ CIA for starting this type of ‘militancy culture’ in South Asia region in 80s.
2nd , US did a mistake to go to Afghan without full support of whole world, including China, whose Xinxiang state also face threat from the same region. I straight say, "either NATO might be capable enough to win in Afghan/ against Al Qaeda and Taliban establishments there, or, they might not have gone there without full support of rest of the world."
3rd , I straight warn US/ West for not leaving Afghanistan if they lose to Taliban/ Al Qaeda as this organization is still very strong which is led by Mr Al Zawahiri now. I straight warn US/ West, leaving Afghanistan with victorious Taliban/ Al Qaeda will pose a serious threat to whole world in future. They will face the worse when they will again face 9/11 type things in West from that certain region/ Afghanistan and Pak’s tribal areas. I tell them, “its no doubt that you have destroyed that region but if you leave this mess as it is, it may destroy even the whole world one day.”
From here, did you read my posts on this matter carefully? I always tried to say, “NATO’s bombings on Afghan to target militants, is right, but they would defend all those families who are on run from there.” You get the point?
Im the man who support this ongoing war in Afghan for the cause of 9/11 2001, if it is intended to remove those establishments from Afghan who may pose the similar threats to West in future. it may also send the Afghanistan into hell under Taliban rule if NATO leave that place. But I said, I don’t support bombing on innocent and those who are on run from there, and they would be defended in Australia type country as first our population is very low and second Afghans come here by boat very often. I straight argue, “how much is the population of Afghanistan, hardly 30mi? and how many of them can come here, no more than 5mil to 10mil? Then can’t we give them space in so low population in the country like Australia of hardly 22mil, which is 2 times bigger in size than India of 1.2bil population? especially if we were first responsible to destroy that country, Afghanistan, and now we are the one who bomb on them making them run from there?” I also said, “if they might be Christians, for example, were they be treated in the same way as the Afghani boat people are treated in Australia as they are Muslims?” I meant to say, “If we may imagine even one time that they are Christians, we will be very happy to accept hardly 4mil to 5mil Afghan population in Australia to fight for the cause of defending the whole world from terrorism, which may be originated from that region in future.”
Means, I support every effort to fight against terrorism, but I support giving space to Afghan refugees in the Western nations like Australia if these refugees are on run from there due to NATO’s bombing, you get the point? Also, I proposed to give a time frame, say 1 month, to all the people living in those certain areas who may face NATO’s air strikes, to leave their home within that certain time frame and if they wish to move somewhere, including Australia, we would welcome them as its because of us.