Thorough Pro
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2008
- Messages
- 13,232
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
"Cat is out of the bag"
Sir what are you trying to say ? I am confused here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sir what are you trying to say ? I am confused here
This is normally both combined. The more we spend on recurring costs, salaries, oil and fuels, pensions, maintenance, energy, the less we have to use for capital expenditure.Is it operational cost to run the army or includes capital funds for purchases?
Not for the LoC as you well know. If acquisition at scale goes through, these guns would be for the artillery units with the strike corps.On the LOC?
Only villagers will be affected. So much for the moral support for the ordinary man that is prominent in professions of support for Kashmir and the Kashmiri.
The reason is it is opaque by design. It serves Pakistan no benefit to announce purchases openly because the adversary has greater buying power and can match every acquisition Pakistan makes. This is also why there is a concept of smart acquisitions in play where the respective service decides what it wants and without a lot of marketing hoopla, gets to induct capabilities with budget localized (major capital acquisitions are of course aside from this category but it gives the services some flexibility).Pakistan's procurement is also more opaque, especially deals with China. This creates a 2-prong issue where (1) it's hard to anticipate what Pakistan will acquire in the near term and (2) it's near-impossible to scuttle the deal if it's from China.
That's true, but I don't think we reduced defence spending (vs. GDP) because of growing healthcare or education costs. Rather, I think the bigger blocker has been our debt repayments, which have ballooned over the past 10 years. IMHO, if not for debt repayments, our real defence budget would likely be in the $13-17 bn a year range. That said, we are pretty much in a debt-snare because of corruption plus a lack of investment in education, skill development, etc to elevate our economic output. However, if all things were held equal, I believe our defence budget would be much higher if not for debt repayments.
I know. I was being sarcastic. Sorry.Not for the LoC as you well know. If acquisition at scale goes through, these guns would be for the artillery units with the strike corps.
The reason is it is opaque is by design. It serves Pakistan no benefit to announce purchases openly because the adversary has greater buying power and can match every acquisition Pakistan makes. This is also why there is a concept of smart acquisitions in play where the respect service decides what it wants and without a lot of marketing hoopla, gets to induct capabilities.
The other benefit of going with the Chinese is that on military acquisitions, the Chinese offer support which is not forthcoming from others. Yes, someone has to pay for these, but the conditionality's on financing etc. are much more favorable.
Hope is what keeps the world alive. But I have to say, making peace is easier said than done.You have a point.
I know that there is a defensive mind-set among Pakistani military planners, and I know that the clumsy, out of sync noises emerging from the present political-military combination at the centre does not give much comfort to these planners, indeed, to anyone.
It is slowly becoming clear that we need a no-war pact. At the moment, it sounds ridiculous, and the strategists in Pakistan, of whom there are so, so many, will immediately throw themselves on the floor for their greater comfort in rolling around laughing, wondering if Pakistan is seriously expected to focus on her own internal problems, and on mending fences with her neighbours to west and east, when it is so much easier to be lazy and continue to be the catspaw of somebody else.
We can only hope. It is impossible as long as we have the present bunch of chuckle-wits ruling Delhi. It may be that we have shifted permanently to a groove so far to the right that people from my generation could never have imagined it to be possible.
Umeed pe duniya qayam hai.
But your so called competitors having too high clearance is also making their recoil stability not as good as SH-15.The clearance should be enough for most usage cases, it’s definitely not as good as its competitors, but with its adjustable/adaptive suspension and engineering’s leading the way it’ll do just fine, keep in mind artillery doesn’t go to the frontlines, it stays back where it’s safe and there’s stable terrain to fire from.
That's true, but I don't think we reduced defence spending (vs. GDP) because of growing healthcare or education costs. Rather, I think the bigger blocker has been our debt repayments, which have ballooned over the past 10 years. IMHO, if not for debt repayments, our real defence budget would likely be in the $13-17 bn a year range. That said, we are pretty much in a debt-snare because of corruption plus a lack of investment in education, skill development, etc to elevate our economic output. However, if all things were held equal, I believe our defence budget would be much higher if not for debt repayments.
Hope is what keeps the world alive. But I have to say, making peace is easier said than done.
That's actually a good thing. That's how it should be.The biggest blocker was 18th amendment in 2010. Now provinces get lion share of FBR revenues, 58% which they spend on education, health etc. With 42% federal govt have to pay debt, defence and other expenses to run government.
Caesar is in no comparison with SH-15 on accuracy, stability, not to mention shoot on moving targets which Caesar is lacking completely.But your so called competitors having too high clearance is also making their recoil stability not as good as SH-15.
SH-15 SPH having the lowest recoil of all competitors. The gun is so stable, it can used direct shooting which none of the competitors are capable to match. It is a pro instead of con.
The concept is good, but it's misapplied in Pakistan. The provincial governments are prone to ethnocentrism, top-heavy corruption, and severe negligence. They're no different than the federal government.That's actually a good thing. That's how it should be.
If only we could get something similar in India.
Brilliant!If we want to take this concept to its full, then Pakistan must devolve into dozens -- if not a hundred or so -- municipal districts. Give each district a locally elected government, and in turn, a simplified tax split with the federal or national government (that's renegotiable every 3-5 years). Do that and Pakistan will do better. I don't know how much better, but I think Karachi, Sialkot, Faisalabad, Gwadar etc, could fourish.
Kindly refrain from making baseless claims. There’s nothing to back up this bias. The SH-15 is not better than it’s competitors capability wise unless you can prove to me otherwise. A video doesn’t prove much in terms of technical aspects and capabilities.Caesar is in no comparison with SH-15 on accuracy, stability, not to mention shoot on moving targets which Caesar is lacking completely.
You have literally no knowledge or military technology, won’t bother replying to you.But your so called competitors having too high clearance is also making their recoil stability not as good as SH-15.
SH-15 SPH having the lowest recoil of all competitors. The gun is so stable, it can used direct shooting which none of the competitors are capable to match. It is a pro instead of con.
You do remember China offered a deal on China-India border issues, 3 times offered in history.I agree.
We just have to keep trying. There is no short-cut, and we have to live on hope and keep at it.
That's actually a good thing. That's how it should be.
If only we could get something similar in India.
As if u got? China has no APFSDS and not know to make one? Don't know which clown says that?Kindly refrain from making baseless claims. There’s nothing to back up this bias. The SH-15 is not better than it’s competitors capability wise unless you can prove to me otherwise. A video doesn’t prove much in terms of technical aspects and capabilities.
You have literally no knowledge or military technology, won’t bother replying to you.
Improve firing accuracy of unguided projectiles by 50%Kindly refrain from making baseless claims. There’s nothing to back up this bias. The SH-15 is not better than it’s competitors capability wise unless you can prove to me otherwise. A video doesn’t prove much in terms of technical aspects and capabilities.
You have literally no knowledge or military technology, won’t bother replying to you.