Senate Democrats protect Obama on Iran vote

[mohsen]

@mohsen

Iran should start the designing of fast breeder reactors. Although they're more vulnerable to strikes, they can potentially give Iran much more weapons grade fissile material than enriching.
I don't see how this deal prevents Iran from undergoing research on this technology.

In the next 15 years, Iran should concentrate its attention on Research on breeder reactors, fusion, small,large PWR etc etc. After all these years of investment in the nuclear field, they have barely made a heavy water reactor.

sounds very efficient, specially for the time we ran out of raw uranium. also it's interesting for those who think we don't have enough uranium mines.

 

[Hack-Hook]

I answered the exactly same questions in my previous posts:
Senate Democrats protect Obama on Iran vote
and no, section 61 has already predicted and sealed it.

Wrong it's section 61 to 63 of the Annex I

61. Consistent with its enrichment and enrichment R&D plan, Iran will only engage in production of centrifuges, including centrifuge rotors suitable for isotope separation or any other centrifuge components, to meet the enrichment and enrichment R&D requirements of this Annex.
62. Consistent with its plan, Iran will use the stock of IR-1 centrifuge machines in storage, which are in excess of the remaining 5060 IR-1 centrifuges in Natanz and the IR-1 centrifuges installed at Fordow, for the replacement of failed or damaged machines. Whenever during the 10 year period from the start of the implementation of the JCPOA, the level of stock of IR-1 machines falls to 500 or below, Iran may maintain this level of stock by resuming production of IR-1 machines at a rate up to the average monthly crash rate without exceeding the stock of 500.
63. Consistent with its plan, at the end of year 8, Iran will commence manufacturing of IR-6 and IR-8 centrifuges without rotors through year 10 at a rate of up to 200 centrifuges per year for each type. After year 10, Iran will produce complete centrifuges with the same rate to meet its enrichment and enrichment R&D needs. Iran will store them at Natanz in an above ground location, under IAEA continuous monitoring, until they are needed for final assembly according to the enrichment and enrichment R&D plan.

There is nothing in it that say Iran can't fill the gap with other centrifuges. Also after 10 years we are free to make any other design and there is no where in agreement any clause to restrict them. In fect you can design them even now on computer models and after 10 year you can start producing them .also nowhere in the agreement it will bar us from buying the centrifuge if you find a willing seller overboard.

 

[mohsen]

Wrong it's section 61 to 63 of the Annex I


There is nothing in it that say Iran can't fill the gap with other centrifuges. Also after 10 years we are free to make any other design and there is no where in agreement any clause to restrict them. In fect you can design them even now on computer models and after 10 year you can start producing them .also nowhere in the agreement it will bar us from buying the centrifuge if you find a willing seller overboard.

section 61 without any time limit says any centrifuges that we make must meet the enrichment requirement of this annex, 200 IR-8 per year, so for example if we build a centrifuge with 48 SWU capacity, we can't produce more than 100 of them per year.

I no longer discuss on this deal's content, it's already over.
مجلس نمایندگان امریکا اختیار لغو تحریم های اصلی را از اوباما گرفت/ تحریم های اصلی فقط با موافقت مجلس نمایندگان رفع خواهد شد/ برجام: ۸ سال پس از اجرای تعهدات ایران، مجلس نمایندگان اقداماتی را برای لغو تحریم ها باید انجام بدهد