What's new

Selling uranium to India in Aus'' strategic interest: Mattoo

S.M.R

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
2,940
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
From Natasha Chaku
Melbourne, Jun 20 (PTI) Selling uranium to India is in Australia''s strategic and economic interest and it could completely transform bilateral ties strained by frequent attacks on Indian students in the country, leading academician Amitabh Mattoo has said.

Mattoo, who was recently appointed the director of Australia India Institute (AII), said that it was imperative for the Australian government to reverse their stand on uranium sale to India.

"Uranium issue is more of Australian domestic politics issue. It is of more of a Labor party issue and there relationship with Greens and impact of what happened in Japan.
It is in Australia''s strategic and economic interest to export uranium to India.," he said.

"The sooner the policy changes, the better will it be for the relationship. There is no doubt that the symbolically, there is only one issue that could transform the relationship it is uranium deal and I hope it happens," Mattoo, who previously served as the vice chancellor of the University of Jammu, said.

Ruling Labor overturned a decision taken by former prime minister John Howard''s Liberal party in 2007 for an exception to allow uranium exports to India, which is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

Australia''s has world''s largest uranium reserves.

Padma Shree awardee Mattoo also advocated close defence ties between the two countries in the backdrop of China''s growing influence in Asia.

"I think both India and Australia have equal stake that China doesn''t become a hegemony," he said.

"The closer cooperation is needed more to see if Asia is not dominated by any single power without trying to make Chinese feel uneasy that there is some ganging up happening," he added.

He said Australia needs to rebuild its image as a competitive education destination after repeated attacks on Indian students in the country.

"AII can really see itself making a great difference between the two sides. It baffles everyone that why a single issue can derail the whole relationship like the students issue despite the fact that two countries have so much in common like human rights, democracy, multiculturalism, English language and increasing trade."
"We can only correct misunderstanding and point out that these are isolated incidents through more and more interactions. There is not an anti-India sentiment here. Such incidents have happened because of peculiar circumstances,":blink: he said.


Selling uranium to India in Aus'' strategic interest: Mattoo - International News

I think China also maintains good relations with Australia, so their decision is not likely to be reversed. Presently china is biggest partner in trade with Australia.
 
.
From Natasha Chaku
Australia''s has world''s largest uranium reserves.

Padma Shree awardee Mattoo also advocated close defence ties between the two countries in the backdrop of China''s growing influence in Asia.

"I think both India and Australia have equal stake that China doesn''t become a hegemony," he said.

"The closer cooperation is needed more to see if Asia is not dominated by any single power without trying to make Chinese feel uneasy that there is some ganging up happening," he added.

Interesting article. Just 10-15 years ago all these countries were imposing sanctions on India (and Pakistan). Today everyone seems to want to supply Nuclear technology, raw materials etc etc with the excuse of balancing out China.
Money really really talks!!!
 
.
Yawn, these threads and articles are boring. So many of them.

Australia won't sell uranium to India. Get over it, move on.
 
. . . . . .
Australians have now make a continuous habit of becoming weary to China.They level of their mindset is such that they have already in collaboration with USA launched a spy satellite recently which is purely China centric.If they are coming out open to support India than it suggests Pakistan come in the radars as well.

Australia and US sign secret satellite spy deal

AUSTRALIA and the United States have begun a partnership to share top-secret intelligence from spy satellites as Australia moves to acquire its own satellite to boost surveillance of Asia and the Pacific.
The secret agreement between Washington and Canberra provides for intensified co-operation and intelligence-sharing in the field of GEOINT - geospatial intelligence derived from imagery and other information obtained from surveillance satellites and reconnaissance aircraft.
The agreement, signed by the federal Labor government in February 2008, has been revealed in a secret US embassy cable obtained by WikiLeaks and provided exclusively to The Age.

The cable reports that former defence minister Joel Fitzgibbon and US Defence Secretary Robert Gates signed a "statement of principles on geospatial intelligence co-operation" at a "closed session" of the February 2008 Australia-United States Ministerial Meeting (AUSMIN) in Canberra.
The US record of the meeting says the agreement is designed "to take GEOINT co-operation to the same level that signals intelligence has reached between the two countries''.

The US and Australia have long worked closely under the framework of the United Kingdom-United States (UKUSA) Agreement that governs signals intelligence co-operation between the US, Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

No reference was made to the new GEOINT agreement in either the 2008 AUSMIN communique or the media conference that followed. The reference to the agreement in the leaked cable from the US embassy in Canberra is specifically classified ''secret''.

The lead agencies involved in implementing the agreement are believed to be the Australian Defence Imagery and Geospatial Organisation at Russell Hill in Canberra and Bendigo in Victoria, and the US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency with headquarters at Fort Belvoir in Virginia.

The agreement provides the context for the federal government's little-noticed decision, mentioned in the May 2009 defence white paper, to acquire an Australian spy satellite as a "high priority". Although the Defence Imagery and Geospatial Organisation already has access to satellite imagery provided by the US intelligence community and bought from commercial satellite imagery suppliers, Australia's status as a satellite imagery consumer rather than producer has been a matter of concern for the Australian intelligence community.

The Defence Department has been considering acquiring an imaging satellite since at least the early 1990s.
''As a significant new measure, the government places a high priority on assured access to high-quality, space-based imagery to meet Defence's needs for mapping, charting, navigation and targeting data,'' the white paper said.

''It has decided to improve Australia's intelligence collection capabilities by acquiring a satellite with a remote sensing capability, most likely to be based on high-resolution, cloud-penetrating, synthetic aperture radar.''

The federal government has released no further information, including the projected cost. US aerospace companies Boeing, Raytheon or Lockheed Martin are the most likely commercial partners in acquiring the satellite, which will be built and launched in the US. The operator of America's spy satellites, the US National Reconnaissance Office, is believed to be closely involved with the Australian project, and the Australian surveillance satellite will probably form part of a constellation of similar satellites operated by the National Reconnaissance Office.

The National Reconnaissance Office in 2008 declassified the fact that it operates synthetic aperture radar satellites. Reportedly codenamed "Lacrosse" and "Onyx", these systems can deliver high-resolution imagery, including through cloud, with a unit cost including launch estimated to be between $820 million and $1.65 billion.

The US will have access to imagery collected by the Australian-owned satellite under the terms of the February 2008 GEOINT agreement.

While Australia has specific intelligence priorities in relation to south-east Asia and Australia's maritime approaches, including the early detection of illegal fishing and people-smuggling boats, an Australian surveillance satellite will also potentially acquire imagery of intelligence significance for the US and other US allies.


Depending on its orbital path, an Australian satellite could also contribute to strategic surveillance of countries including China, North Korea, Russia, India, Pakistan, Iran and other parts of the Middle East.

Unclassified studies indicate that a synthetic aperture radar satellite was identified by the Defence Science and Technology Organisation as a surveillance option for Australia as long ago as 1991. But at that time such a project was considered "beyond our resources and cannot be justified in the present strategic and economic circumstances" .

Another leaked US embassy cable shows that a congressman involved in oversight of the US intelligence community, Republican Ray LaHood, told then prime minister Kevin Rudd in January 2008 that "the US has no better friend on intelligence issues than Australia".
 
.
October 2011 is the date when the Australian decision is going to be reversed.

Bookmark this page. You can make fun of me if it never happens.

Sincerely, If it happens, it is good.

All the nations of the world have the right to have nukes, like all these superpowers.
 
.
Sincerely, If it happens, it is good.

All the nations of the world have the right to have nukes, like all these superpowers.

Its for the energy starved power sectors. We dont need more nukes.Enough is enough.

Besides Uranium is also available from Canada, Kazakh and even mined locally.
 
.
Sincerely, If it happens, it is good.

All the nations of the world have the right to have nukes, like all these superpowers.

No not really.

Only responsible nations should have nukes.
 
.
No not really.

Only responsible nations should have nukes.

Who is that 'responsible' nation in the world? the one who used on Japan? any other example of use of nukes?
 
.
Pakistan shouldn't fret on this and continue trying to enrich Plutonium, which is better for bombs. Or, on the other hand, realize you have more than enough bombs and use the Uranium you already have to make cheap electricity for the poor (goes out to India & Pakistan), you can always use the Nuclear Waste as a toxic weapon.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom