What's new

Sectarian Clash : Myanmar claims 'Jamaat link' : Dipu Moni tells JS

Myanmar ethnic cleansing will continue as Bamar majority and Rakhine Buddhists agree on this policy. Rohingya's do not have citizenship according to their constitution. Someone has to stand up to save the Rohingya otherwise they will eventually be cleansed/purged from their land. Out of 2 million, they have already kicked out about 1.2 million. So here is what I propose:

- Bangladesh as the closest ethnic group to Rohingya's and the most affected refugee recipient of this ethnic cleansing, should take up this humanitarian cause and present it on world stage
- but we cannot do this under RAWamy Indian puppets, so we need to wait till these idiots are kicked out from power
- once RAWamy's are out and BNP is in, I recommend the following policy
- present to UN their 1982 citizenship law and ask for security council and general assembly resolution to oust Myanmar from UN, since their 1982 constitution many UN charters including the Declaration of Human Rights
- present to ASEAN the same issue and ask them to oust Myanmar from ASEAN
- approach all country's that have relationship with Myanmar to freeze their relationship with this rogue country
- after we exhaust all effort to change behavior of this country and its people, we should write off the uncaring countries as callous sanctimonious bastards, which is actually the real condition for most of humanity, so we should not waste too much time on these fruitless diplomatic efforts, but we should be ready to take notice and downgrade our relationship with all countries that do not cooperate with us. We will have to be aggressive and make them choose, between Myamar or Bangladesh, either you are with us or against us
- then we should support a full scale insurgency by the Rohingya's, by arming them to teeth, in the meantime, we will get ready for a full scale war with these bastards
- the goal would be to carve out a buffer state from a part of Arakan/Rakhine state along Bangladesh border which will a de facto vassal state for Bangladesh with eventual goal of annexation into Bangladesh

The only other option is to kiss the dirty Bamar/Rakhine/Mog a&& and take all Rohingya's into our country and deal with them. The option to leave thing as is will continue to affect Bangladesh Myanmar relations for decades till the Rohingya's are completely purged, which is essentially the same as taking them all in but wasting time in the process.

Some may ask, what about future Myanmar-Bangladesh relations, I would say screw that, you can have relationship with human beings, but you cannot have relationship with animals and the animals will either submit to you or bite you. I say we make them submit to the the laws of humanity and equal rights. The whole world will be with us, or some of them will, even if no one is with us, I say we go in and take care of it on our own.

I am now going to post this on all Myanmar related threads.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/bangla...ethnic-cleansing-stopped-3.html#ixzz1xtUMBO93
 
Well, both Zia and Mujib had their contributions. I certainly think the two parties are pushing it a bit. Especially the AL. They are literally making Mujib some sort of cult personality. Some of hallmarks of fascism.



What you say is sadly true. The Thais are generally extremely mechanical and profit-driven.

I admit, Bangladesh did extremely little to highlight the plight of Rohingyas. Especially considering that we have been hosting those refugees for well over three decades. We are also the largest contributor of UN peacekeeping. I wonder what hindered them. Maybe they were too lazy? Scared?

The time to take concrete steps is now. Everyone must highlight this.

Have you ever heard, same type of issue exist between Nepal and Bhutan. Bhutan consider Nepalese as illegal settlers in southern part of the country and many of them are living in refugee camps in Nepal as stateless people. Same case like Myanmar as they too say they settled during British period.
 
Have you ever heard, Same type of issue exist between Nepal and Bhutan. Bhutan consider Nepalese as illegal settlers in southern part if the country and many of them are living in refugee camps in Nepal as stateless people. Same case like Myanmar.

Fortunately for Bhutan, they do not have a border with Nepal, so Nepal can do nothing. It is better for India to annex Bhutan and put it out of its misery, like it did with Sikkim.
 
Nah they just hate muslims for taking half of their ancient india..... though their common excuse is they also have huge muslim population. But go to any world defence section thread their hatred to muslims is apparent in every post related to muslims.....
 
^^^
As if Muslims do not hate Muslims.. :lol:

Pakistanis killed Bangladeshis..

Bangladeshis pushing brother Rohingyas back..

and then they cry about others.. You people are such a joke!!
 
^^^
As if Muslims do not hate Muslims.. :lol:

Pakistanis killed Bangladeshis..

Bangladeshis pushing brother Rohingyas back..

and then they cry about others.. You people are such a joke!!

it was a purely political conflict between pro and anti Pakistan sides......had absolutely NOTHING to do with religion at all --though it was your proxies that butchered anyone that even wore a beard, let alone defended Pakistan
 
^^^
As if Muslims do not hate Muslims.. :lol:

Pakistanis killed Bangladeshis..

Bangladeshis pushing brother Rohingyas back..

and then they cry about others.. You people are such a joke!!

Why would Indians care about the Muslims in Egypt for example??? Indians and pakistanis and wannabe pakistanis from bangladesh hate each other and its pretty obvious on the internet including this forum. Since these thekedars consider themselves equal to 'all muslims', their conclusions are as dumb as their reasoning.

Fact is these dimwits have mentioed RAW and Hindu hand right from the very first thread on the topic, without any basis as per their childhood indoctrination of hating the Hindoo and now they are doing more rona dhona as per their jihadi victimhood 101.
 
it was a purely political conflict between pro and anti Pakistan sides......had absolutely NOTHING to do with religion at all --though it was your proxies that butchered anyone that even wore a beard, let alone defended Pakistan

The point is Muslims were not able to co-exist.. Same is happening in Pakistan.. I think the situation in Bangladesh is better..

jihadi victimhood handbook.

Big lol at that !! :rofl:
 
The point is Muslims were not able to co-exist.. Same is happening in Pakistan.. I think the situation in Bangladesh is better..

co-exist??

so by that logic, india should be broken into thousands of countries since hindus dont get along too well either.....considering the plight of dalits and ''untouchables'' (who often face death and daily discrimination)

and when it comes to crying victimhood, you bhartis are expert at it
 
co-exist??

so by that logic, india should be broken into thousands of countries since hindus dont get along too well either.....considering the plight of dalits and ''untouchables'' (who often face death and daily discrimination)

Tell that to the delusional kalu mia who wants to carve out Arakan and then merge it with Bangladesh :lol::lol::lol:
 
1. That claim by Dipu is weird. Nobody in BD ever believes a word Hasina or Dipu tells.

2. "Mr Speaker, today the Two Nation Theory is dead". Thus spoke Indira Gandhi to the Lok Sabha announcing the surrender of Niazi. India will not allow BD to take any action anywhere that will bring her closer to the Muslim world. Indira was very upset when Sheikh had attended the OIC meeting in LHR in spite of her repeated requests not to. Even the BD cricket team's Pak tour was sabotaged by manufactured agitation of BAL youth groups under RAW control. That would have brought the two peoples closer. Even here BD should not exhibit any extra concern for fellow Muslim brothers and sisters. That is the condition BAL has to work under.
 
it was a purely political conflict between pro and anti Pakistan sides......had absolutely NOTHING to do with religion at all --though it was your proxies that butchered anyone that even wore a beard, let alone defended Pakistan

Hey what about Karachi, Hazaras and unwanted Biharis.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom