What's new

Secret Diplomacy behind Mumbai Blasts

there's a reason why RD was working in Pakistan.. let me help "epicenter" and "hosting world famous terror icons" was the reason..

Yes, the obvious reason, Pak-Afghan border. You dont have any such border so RD was not in India. it is Pakistan's strategic location which is important for few countries and pain in a$$ for few.
 
.
Your arguments are as ridiculous as your comprehension skills ..perhaps you also need to be explained what an exclamation mark denotes .

Rest of argument is bullshit ..find the above named organisations in UN terror list and I believe you.

Why do you need US / UN certificate for every of your claim. Saffron terror is also not in US list, do you deny its existence as well?
 
.
@post 24
Yes and Osama was found living luxuriously in the army garrison in India only... also our border region hosts most of the worlds dreaded terrorists...

desperation on display in this thread. now, isn't it??

Same like shiv sena terrorists sitting luxiriously in indian commercial capital. & VHP terrorist giving anti Pakistan speeches in India's industrial state of gujarat.
 
.
That's all you can come up with.

Same guys talking about UN whose country doesn't accept UN resolution on Kashmir issue, wonderful. When UN doesn't care about big issues like Kashmir than why would they add Indian terror groups in its list

Why do you need US / UN certificate for every of your claim. Saffron terror is also not in US list, do you deny its existence as well?

Because as far as this forum is concerned only organisations which have been classified by UN as terrorist organisation will called as such.. but if it comes down to each member classifying its own terrorist organisation..then we can also climb down to your pathetic level and start claiming .."your army, ISI ,JUI etc are terrorist organisations' ..but that to would be ridiculous argument not unlike yours.
 
.
Same like shiv sena terrorists sitting luxiriously in indian commercial capital. & VHP terrorist giving anti Pakistan speeches in India's industrial state of gujarat.

Clearly you don't even know what terrorism is!!..giving a anti pakistan speech is not terrorism ..or perhaps you could point the list of their terror activities.
 
.
Same like shiv sena terrorists sitting luxiriously in indian commercial capital. & VHP terrorist giving anti Pakistan speeches in India's industrial state of gujarat.

while the entire world has been seeing pakistan as the epicenter of terrorism you are giving a foolish argument , and comparing terror groups like let and al - qaeda with religious outfits like vhp and rss ,
 
.
Unfortunate that some of our Indian friends are defensive, rather than critical -- We all know that powerful interests do not want to see peace and normalcy between Pakistan and India, agreed??? Should we not explore every reasonable area to see if we cannot shed onlight on who these interests are or represent?? I think we should keep an open mind on this
 
.
Same like shiv sena terrorists sitting luxiriously in indian commercial capital. & VHP terrorist giving anti Pakistan speeches in India's industrial state of gujarat.

if shiv sena and vhp groups could have been bigger terror groups than LET or JUD , then USA would have been using its drones in mumbai not in pakistan , and they would have arrested hindus after 9/11
 
.
Indian outfits, Pakistani outfits? Saffron outfit? Jihadi outfit? Foreign intelligence?? Reality is that it could be any of these, all of these have a stake in the continuation of hostile relations between Pakistan and India -- lets not agree to be their hostages, lets look into every reasonable venue, lets investigate these in a transparent manner and lay our findings before the peoples of both countries.
 
.
I think the best decision GoI took this time to 'de-link' terror strikes with the diologue process . If the very aim of these groups is to bring India to the negotiation table, it is there without the strikes and this decision itself shows delhi wants peace. Now if Pakistan authorities cut the head off the rouge elements within their security establishments, peace will prevail, else the talks will be focused on terrorism, not the solutions of the problems.
 
.
I think the best decision GoI took this time to 'de-link' terror strikes with the diologue process . If the very aim of these groups is to bring India to the negotiation table, it is there without the strikes and this decision itself shows delhi wants peace. Now if Pakistan authorities cut the head off the rouge elements within their security establishments, peace will prevail, else the talks will be focused on terrorism, not the solutions of the problems.

De-link terror strikes with the dialogue process!....I think not. Photo opportunity Indo Pak talks are not important than an Indian citizen’s life.
We in fact should link terrorism strongly with the dialogue process. Any forward movement on any issue must be commensurate with Pakistan’s action on Jehadi elements that target India
 
. . .
What a looser this chudhambaram is, this statement was said in one US channal about Pakistan, i watched it where one host said that "you won't find any single country in the world who's position is like Pakistan, Pakistan faces the most troubled & hostile neighbourhood as it's two huge borders are hostile one's & internal chaos multiply problems of Pakistan" He mean to say that none of the country in whole world faces next door threats like Pakistan is facing from Afghanistan & India.


Dude right there you have misspelled someone name and that too with a gali, post reported.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom