p3avi8tor69
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2012
- Messages
- 289
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
If you’re a Chinese living in the US I understand how you feel but sorry to burst your bubble . Obviously you know nothing ‘bout history, FYI we fought many wars with the US (World Wars/Korean/Vietnam/Gulf War even in War on Terror. The Philippines is US Asia’s oldest allies and our country is vital strategic point for the US. Uncle Sam can't afford to lose us since it would start a domino effect that leads to total American defeat. Philippines’ defense is US's responsibility (as well as ours as its citizens). The real trouble maker here is not the Philippines but China, they think they own everything since ancient times and with this kind of barbaric attitude they can actually cause WW3. I hope China will soon choke on its own greed..
You have been at most an opportunistic ally. When the going gets tough your country gets going - to home. You guys ran with your tails between your leg when one of your citizen got kidnapped in Iraq. You have only sent token representation when my country is engaged in warfare so you can bleed us some. Your defence is not our responsibilty. It is yours. No one will come to your aid if shooting starts in the disputed sea. If the Chinese gets greedy and take your capital then we'll go in. But as far as those submerged rocks are concerned, you are all alone. Stop trying to drag us into your spat with the Chinese. Let me ask you, what steps have your country done for its defence. Let me guess, not much because you thought since we have a treaty we will automatically jump to save you. Nope. We will save you only if they turn you into a punching bag. But do us a favor, try to save yourselves for once, or at least make a semblance of trying.
So it appears your ownership claim on those rocks is pretty shaky. Here is an article from your newspaper:
Psst… US isn’t with Unclos
By: Rigoberto Tiglao
Philippine Daily Inquirer
1:03 am | Thursday, May 10th, 2012
share86 72
It’s been awkward—even comical—for the Aquino administration to be begging the United States for arms to defend our Scarborough Shoal claim, which it declared is based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos): the Americans aren’t with the convention.
The US—together with Israel and Turkey—is among 34 nations that have not ratified Unclos; they therefore officially do not recognize it. State Secretary Hillary Clinton in 2009 said the US Senate would ratify it soon. Three years later, it hasn’t even scheduled a vote on it.
The US’ rejection of Unclos—ratified by 162 nations including China and Russia—in fact unmasks American foreign policy’s basic guideline: “Might is right.” The US is the sole military global superpower now, its navy dwarfing that of Russia and China combined. Why would the US allow these 162 Unclos military weaklings tell what its all-powerful navy can and cannot do, where it can or cannot go?
Two Unclos provisions illustrate this point. Article 20: “In the territorial sea, submarines and other underwater vehicles are required to navigate on the surface and to show their flag.” Would American nuclear submarines, which routinely, secretly traverse Chinese and Russian waters want that? Article 88: “The high seas shall be reserved for peaceful purposes.” But international waters make up the base of US warships, from which it projects its military power globally.
President Aquino and his officials have been banging their fists on the table complaining to the world that China is refusing to have the dispute settled by the International Tribunal for Unclos.
They’re in for a surprise: The Philippines isn’t also with Unclos—when it comes to sovereignty disputes like that on Scarborough.
The Marcos government ratified Unclos in 1984. But it did not ratify the treaty in full, declaring that it doesn’t recognize Unclos on certain issues. Guess which?
On issues of sovereignty. Our country formally filed an eight-paragraph document when it ratified Unclos, which declared that nothing in the treaty would apply to its territorial claims. Its Paragraph 4 reads: “Such signing shall not in any manner impair or prejudice the sovereignty of the Philippines over any territory over which it exercises sovereign authority, such as the Kalayaan Islands, and the waters appurtenant thereto.”
In other words, we’ve declared that we do not recognize Unclos when it comes to our territorial disputes, such as that on Scarborough. The only body that can revise that restriction is the Philippine Senate.
And what were China’s qualifications when it ratified Unclos in 1996?
On issues of sovereignty. China in its own declaration said that it “reaffirms its sovereignty over all its archipelagos and islands as listed in article 2 of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on the territorial sea and the contiguous zone, which was promulgated on 25 February 1992.” That law declared as part of China what it called the Zhongsha Islands, which included Huangyan (Panatag to us).
In other words, both the Philippines and China—in fact most of the countries which ratified Unclos—don’t recognize the treaty when it comes to determining territorial disputes.
Didn’t they bother check what Unclos tribunal does? Of the 19 cases brought to it since 1997, nearly all were about maritime disputes, i.e., commercial vessels in some tiff with a foreign government. The only case that remotely dealt with sovereignty was about Burma’s (Myanmar) and Bangladesh’s maritime boundaries at the Bay of Bengal between the two countries.
First, Mr. Aquino makes the colossal blunder of sending a warship against Chinese fishermen, thereby militarizing the dispute, even as the vessel embarrassingly turned tail after a few days as it ran out of supplies. Then he insists that the dispute be decided by a court which, however, can’t have jurisdiction over it. This President is making us the laughing stock of the world.
* * *