"SCO is about to admit India and Pakistan as full members"

[roadrunner]

No its not there. Stop lying. If it was over the UN site why would the UN try to remove it from the disputed territory list if the UN knows India is the guilty one.

IT'S NOT REMOVED for the last time. Look up UN resolutions on Kashmir. They've been mentioned in the last few days by politicians and by Gilani in the last months.

Stop wasting time with your weak points. The Korbel reference to 21,000 is there. Now go away and search for it.

 

[Varad]

IT'S NOT REMOVED for the last time. Look up UN resolutions on Kashmir. They've been mentioned in the last few days by politicians and by Gilani in the last months.

Stop wasting time with your weak points. The Korbel reference to 21,000 is there. Now go away and search for it.

I wonder you can so easily jump up and post a retired officials statement that you contorted for you own convienence and you cannot post a link from UN website. Bro, as i said before stop living in denial and stop lying, it would always hurt you the most.

 

[Galaxy]

@ Roadrunner

Same thing happened yesterday also. You always put wrong information on board and when someone asks the official Link, You fail to post and divert the topic with personal opinion of someone who's view hardly matters. Everyday same story with you. Give some concrete evidence and don't live in denial. Do some more research before posting.

 

[roadrunner]

Pakistan accepted the proposal, India rejected it. India kept insisting on keeping 21,000 troops in Kashmir. Korbel says “The Prime Minister of Pakistan agreed to take the first step to withdraw the Pakistan army. But Sir Owen`s gratification was short-lived (Danger in Kashmir, pp 159, 168, 17-172).

India shying away from talks | Latest news, Breaking news, Pakistan News, World news, business, sport and multimedia | DAWN.COM

 

[Varad]

Guys this is what i found on the so called Korbel reference. And guess what its aint a UN site.
And this same guy arguing back in 2006.

Pakistan Forum , THE SOLUTION TO KASHMIR

 

[roadrunner]

@ Roadrunner

Same thing happened yesterday also. You always put wrong information on board

I never put wrong information ont he board. I only don't put the lies Indian media gives you.

 

[Varad]

Pakistan accepted the proposal, India rejected it. India kept insisting on keeping 21,000 troops in Kashmir. Korbel says “The Prime Minister of Pakistan agreed to take the first step to withdraw the Pakistan army. But Sir Owen`s gratification was short-lived (Danger in Kashmir, pp 159, 168, 17-172).

India shying away from talks | Latest news, Breaking news, Pakistan News, World news, business, sport and multimedia | DAWN.COM

Why dont you provide your UN source instead of a Pakistani one. Why are you spoon feeding us with a Pakistani source are'nt you tired of it now.

 

[roadrunner]

the reference to the book is there. more references to journals and the un are also. search engines are your friend.

i can only think i'm dealing with someone that is incapable.

 

[Galaxy]

the reference to the book is there. more references to journals and the un are also. search engines are your friend.

i can only think i'm dealing with someone that is incapable.

Again same crap. When some Indians post India media news, You say you don't believe. No Problem. Same thing can go with Pakistan media also. In Any case, It's not anything said by U.N. But Post from UN or International organisations rather posting anyone's personal opinion.

You shown your capability by posting 100's of useless post without a single evidence. And when things go oppoiste, you take your roadrunner to go Tokelau in Karachi

 

[Varad]

the reference to the book is there. more references to journals and the un are also. search engines are your friend.

i can only think i'm dealing with someone that is incapable.

BS, if UNCIP ever accused India, it would have been somewhere documented somewhere in the 27 drafts and resolutions on the subject. First you say, the news is all over the UN site , now you say its just a reference from a book. References can easily be used out of context to mould the truth is'nt it.

Your whole claims are based on 23rd December 1952 resolution. I ask you to kindly come back to 13th August 1948 resoltion just after the war. Then come to the very next resolution on 5 th January 1949.

http://www.kashmiri-cc.ca/un/sc5jan49.htm
And go through the first two points :-

1 The question of the accession of the State of Jammu and Kashmir to India or Pakistan will be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite;

2 A plebiscite will be held when it shall be found by the Commission that the cease-fire and truce arrangements set forth in Parts I and II of the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948, have been carried out and arrangements for the plebiscite have been completed;

The second point clearly states that all was to be done on the basis of 23rd August 1948 resolution. So, its not hard to see which country tried to stretch this issue by more than 4 years rather than following the UN mandate.Stop living in denial.

 

[gubbi]

It is ALL over the place. Check out the UN website.

I feel like I' spoonfeeding a baby.

India had to withdraw its troops down to 18000 as per resolution 80. It claimed it needed 21000 troops and refused at that point to demilitarize. Look up the Korbel reference if you need to.

Sir Owen Dixon may have mentioned it in 1950 that India refused to cooperate. It makes no difference. He knew at that point India did not want to demilitarize. The latter refusal to demilitarize to 18000 just proved Owen Dixon was right.

You are forgetting UN Resolution 47 on Kashmir. That resolution came way before Shimla agreements, way before any of the resolutions you are using in your lame attempts to justify Pakistan's stand. No ones buying it.

The third resolution on Kashmir (previous being 38 and 39) states that Pakistan remove all of its forces. Pakistan ignored it. You are conveniently ignoring it. So why should India agree to any other UN resolutions, most of which are non-binding (under Chapter VI)?

 

[suryakiran]

+

+ +

= SCO.

^West's worst economic nightmare !

If Japan and South Korea joins SCO, then it will be the true nightmare for the West...

 

[suryakiran]

+

Equal founding partners with China and Russia so let's not forget about them.

Sorry my friend, I' am not able to recognize few of these flags. Which countries do they belong to?

 

[WARRANT]

If Japan and South Korea joins SCO, then it will be the true nightmare for the West...

Those are Americas pets , its never gonna happen.

 

[gubbi]

Sorry my friend, I' am not able to recognize few of these flags. Which countries do they belong to?

in order:

Uzbekistan

Tajikistan

Kyrgyzstan

Kazakhstan