I critisized immoral contact (handshaking) of zarif, al-sadr with salman. However fortunately shaking hand/meeting does not mean that they back saudi position in Yemen.
The saudis can say whatever about Iran, but facts are clear:
1. In case of Yemen:No Iranian presence in Yemen, no soldiers, no tanks, no jets. Only few times alleged weapon smuggling, while west is selling billions of arms to saudi. Further: Houthis are an independent force, Iran even discouraged them from seizing Sanaa in September 2015.
2. You didnt mention Iraq, but I'll mention Iraq and Syria together because this is one of the main arguments of saudis against Iran. Iranian role/support was asked by the governments of these countries. Saudi was never invited. By suffering of all Iraqis and Syrians in these civil wars, the positive outcomes were that genocides against certain groups (alawites, yezidis, shias, christians, sunni secularists/pro-government sunnis) were prevented and also "somalization" of these countries were prevented. So there is a balance of both bad and good results. If Saudi could decide the fate, the results would be purely bad.
I think you should take your medicine irani and worry about your yazd, isfahan, tajikistan, kabul, tora bora and similar matters as there should be a limit to nonsense even on PDF. Beautiful and ancient Syria, Iraq, Yemen etc. is not for your likes to discuss.
Well Saudis, Arabs and other countries they say the same on the iranian government
If you say how can Zarif shake hands with al jubair because his countr is killing Syrians and Yemenis the Saudis would say the same about zarif and his country also involved in in the killings of Syrians and Yemenis
If you say how can zarif shake hands with member of a government that oppresses it's own citizens on sectarian bases the Saudis would say the same about al jubair shaking hands with a member of a government that is involved in oppressing its own Sunni citizens and other religious minorities
Al Hasani is not Najdi or hanbali but he is sha'fie from hijaz I remember he is encouraging al mu'tazilah ideology to come back
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muʿtazila
This thread is a nonsense thread. Nothing to do with sect either. It is about cleaning terrorists/hooligans/criminals that have inflicted harm and suffering to locals for months (if not years) of Al-Awamiyyah. They have been condemned by local Shia clerics (Twelver) ages ago and publicly. No civilians are present in that old neighborhood. No sign of even the smallest unrest anywhere else in that region.
Al-Awamiyyah has long had a reputation of being a hub of crime in KSA. Shias from neighboring towns have a negative view of that community too. Just ask some locals or read what is being written on forums, social media and what is written in Arab media.
Most anti-House of Saud individuals in KSA and among the diaspora are Sunnis. Whether Islamists or non-Islamists. Whether inside KSA or in the Arab world or West/East.
In fact the Shia community in the Eastern Province has good ties with the House of Saud and local governors. Been the case for many decades. In fact the House of Saud is originally from Eastern Arabia and not Najd.
1) They have killed innocent locals (sect does not matter here but they were Shia like that little boy)
2) They have been killing expats and construction workers minding their own business and who were working to improve their neighborhood.
3) They have been killing a few police (local ones too or from the Eastern Province - obviously there is not police from Riyadh 1000 km away, Al-Jawf 1500 km away or Jeddah 2000 km away (almost), for instance.
4) They have been condemned by the local community, including the religious community ages ago.
5) We are talking about 1 neighborhood in 1 city (Al-Awamiyyah) the size of 25.000 people.
6) Number of civilians killed in those clashes can be counted on 1 hand or at most 2. With the firepower available no sane person is going to claim that they deliberately killed non-terrorists/hooligans/criminals because they could easily carpet bomb the entire village if they wanted to (in theory) within 1 hour. Not only that such a policy would be extremely counterproductive.
7) The thread starter could not care less about Saudi Arabians, Arabs, Shias, Sunnis, Muslims etc. as he has a long history of being hostile to all of those. So you were right about his strange/fake behavior. I don't like fake people who have fake agendas here hence I have no respect for his likes. If he spoke openly as I do I could have some respect for him despite disagreeing. Typical trait among his people BTW. Totally contrary to our tradition.
8) Bin Salman has made it clear that sectarianism won't be tolerated as has King Salman. Previous hardliner clerics have been either dismissed or put aside (early retirement). Any national voicing opinions that threaten the coexistence and stability of the nation, is punished and openly isolated by the society, especially during wartime.
9) KSA is not a democracy, nobody claims that, and has its problems, including with a number of sectarian individuals/communities, but it is far from widespread and actually most youth (75% of KSA's population is below 30) find sectarian remarks as a sign of backwardness. It is frowned upon too.
10) I think it is regrettable that such a situation has even been ongoing for this long in that neighborhood but hopefully the troublemakers have been dealt with for good and the next time there will be disagreements, it will be solved by dialogue and not violence. However at one point in time the state will no longer have the patience or will to remain silent and not act. The police and state could not act while young police were shot at or sometimes killed during simple patrols while nobody even attacked their neighborhood.