What's new

Saudi-led coalition: Pakistan won’t support moves against Syria or Iran

ghazi52

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
102,921
Reaction score
106
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
..........................................................................
Pakistan won’t support moves against Syria or Iran

1015559-Pakistaniforces-1450953252-693-640x480.jpg



ISLAMABAD: Pakistan may have joined the Saudi Arabia-led 34-nation coalition against terrorism, but it will not support any move that destabilises Syria or strains Islamabad’s relationship with Tehran, senior Foreign Office officials said on Wednesday.

According to them, the assurance came from the federal government during an in-camera session of the Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs. Prime Minister’s Adviser on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz and Foreign Secretary Aizaz Ahmed Chaudhry attended the meeting presided over by committee chairperson Senator Nuzhat Sadiq.

The meeting discussed the decision of the government to join the Saudi-led coalition and its possible implications for Pakistan.

According to insiders, some committee members voiced concerns over the government’s decision of joining the Saudi alliance without taking parliament into confidence. Their apprehensions stemmed from fears that the newly-formed alliance might be used against Syria and Iran.

However, FO officials, according to sources, dismissed such concerns and clarified that Pakistan’s participation in the Saudi coalition is only meant for efforts against terrorism.

The official pointed out that Pakistan’s position on Syria remained clear that it was strictly opposed to foreign intervention for ousting the government of President Basharul Assad.

“We will continue to seek the political solution of the Syrian crisis,” the official added, allaying fears of some of the committee members.

The Saudi-led alliance is seen as an attempt by Riyadh to reassert itself at a time when realignments are taking place in the wake of the world powers’ nuclear deal with Iran.

The committee members also warned the government that Saudi Arabia formed the alliance to counter Iran, something that carries huge implications.

However, FO officials insisted that Pakistan’s relations with Iran will not be affected by its decision to join Saudi coalition. “This coalition is not against any specific country,” explained the FO official.

....
 
. . . . .
If the Saudis are willing to pay the entire funds for an expeditionary force to Iraq/Syria; I say jump at it. Chance to strike at the center of militancy.

Zarb-e-Azab International!
 
.
If the Saudis are willing to pay the entire funds for an expeditionary force to Iraq/Syria; I say jump at it. Chance to strike at the center of militancy.

Zarb-e-Azab International!
I would only support that if Saudis + their GCC brothers agree to fund at least a $50 billion defense budget for Pakistan military annually for at least 20 years. We'll need to comprehensively frack India as well along-with our International Zarb-e-Azam campaign simultaneously, preferably without using nukes, down to the tip of Assam and Manipur.
 
.
If the Saudis are willing to pay the entire funds for an expeditionary force to Iraq/Syria; I say jump at it. Chance to strike at the center of militancy.

Zarb-e-Azab International!

and you will be first one to command it ..
will you go in to fight to ISIS and , fight this Shia Sunni war ?
Please i suggest you to head to Afghanistan :)
 
. .
Well the posture lasted long enough during the Yemen crisis for the Saudis to back off. Remember the threats made by UAE?

So far, so good. However, this mayhem is only going to grow for quite some time yet and will envelope many more, Pakistan included.
 
.
Pakistan must not be involved in any sectarian war. The Saudi gave $42 billion to Egypt and it did not even send troops to Yemen and Syria. They are offering peanuts to Pakistan and trying to convince to send troops to do the fighting for them. Pakistan has paid dearly for Afghan wars and we must not join these Saudi wars.
 
.
If the Saudis are willing to pay the entire funds for an expeditionary force to Iraq/Syria; I say jump at it. Chance to strike at the center of militancy.

Zarb-e-Azab International!

Pakistan is already fighting a war of its own. There are no troops to spare. Let's not sell our troops for bullets

I would only support that if Saudis + their GCC brothers agree to fund at least a $50 billion defense budget for Pakistan military annually for at least 20 years. We'll need to comprehensively frack India as well along-with our International Zarb-e-Azam campaign simultaneously, preferably without using nukes, down to the tip of Assam and Manipur.

Money vs lives of our troops.

It's better to die defending homeland than as mercenary for someone else's agenda.
 
.
I would only support that if Saudis + their GCC brothers agree to fund at least a $50 billion

Pakistan will not be part of any sectarian wars. They gave $42 billion to Egypt for nothing and they should offer to repay Pakistan's total external debt which is around $92 billion.
 
.
If the Saudis are willing to pay the entire funds for an expeditionary force to Iraq/Syria; I say jump at it. Chance to strike at the center of militancy.

Zarb-e-Azab International!
Center of millitancy is Saudi Arabia US and co.
 
.
Why Saudis and Iranian don't sit and solve the problems? Sectarian war is technically against the entire Islam. Even defeating ISIS without solving the problems between Iran and Saudi is completely absurd. These both are fueling this fire.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom