Saudi Foreign Minister says Assad has no place in Syria future

[الأعرابي]

So Tell me again. How many innocent people are you willing to kill for 1 non existing "Wahhabist"?

 

[Styx]

So Tell me again. How many innocent people are you willing to kill for 1 non existing "Wahhabist"?

1st, this islamo-nazi ideology is very real

2nd, those who harbour these terrorists within them are anything but innocent, so, as many as it takes, I suppose

 

[الأعرابي]

1st, this islamo-nazi ideology is very real

2nd, those who harbour these terrorists within them are anything but innocent, so, as many as it takes, I suppose

1. Sure it's real, in your head that is. Now can you tell me the name of one person who claims to be a "Wahhabist" or "Wahhabi" or whatever you Mullah boy wanna call them?

2. Sounds like zionists excuses when they kill innocent Palestinians, well i guess that's just another thing in common between your mullahs and them. Of course the Zionists are little less barbaric than your kind, they're not planning to kill plenty of innocent civilians for one "Wahhabist", "Wahhabi", "Wahabi" and so on....

 

[Styx]

1. Sure it's real, in your head that is. Now can you tell me the name of one person who claims to be a "Wahhabist" or "Wahhabi" or whatever you Mullah boy wanna call them?

jihadi group liwa al-tawhid ? the name itself is inspired by the terror manual, the 'kitab al-tawhid' the rest of the so called FSA are the same, al qaeda, nusra, isis.. all wahhabis aka islamic nazis

2. Sounds like zionists excuses when they kill innocent Palestinians, well i guess that's just another thing in common between your mullahs and them. Of course the Zionists are little less barbaric than your kind, they're not planning to kill plenty of innocent civilians for one "Wahhabist", "Wahhabi", "Wahabi" and so on....

"my" mullas wut ?

imo the Iranian mullas should stfu about destroying Israel and forget Palestine for their own sake, but, at least they're not spreading jihad and terrorism throughout the world.

I support Israel vs hamas terrorists, but don't like them supporting the so called rebels in Syria.. but, knowing the zionists, the clever bastards probably have a masterplan.

 

[temp1994]

if he has to go down, he must go down fighting and kill as many wahhabists as possible

what is it, 70-80 civvies for one wahhabist jihadi pig ? .. fuckin' worth it, that's the greatest evil on earth, man.. barring none

even 700 or 7000 for one is a fair price, its all of humanity vs those guys

1. There is no Wahabi Islam. It is a slur used by non-Hanbali muslims to bash Hanbali muslims as bashing Hanbalis directly would lead to another Islamic civil war.This was a termed that has been popularized by non-Hanbali muslims to blame lay complete blame of Islamic terrorism at Saudi/Hanbali doorsteps so that they do not have to take any responsibility for Islamic terrorism.


2.Majority of Terrorists are non-Wahabi/Hanbali . Taliban are followers of Deoband which is a part of Sufi Islam, so are chechens, and I have not broached upon Shia terrorists which may be more in number on per-capita basis than sunnis. In fact Indians hating wahabis is frankly stupid. If we discount rise of Islamic fascism in state of Kerala, Wahabis have not been involved in any direct attack on India.Even in Kerala, it is sickular policies of Glorious Soviet Socialist Secular state of malluistan which are responsible for Islamic fascism.

In fact it is wanabee Arabs who are bigger Islamofascists than Arabs. Kerala's education minister refused to light a lamp at an international seminar stating that lighting lamps is infidel Hindu practice and lighting lamp would make him a kuffar, but Dubai's minister never had problem with inaugurating function with lighting lamps.



3. Most of funding for terrorists is done by Wahabis/Hanbalis. This is true but it has more to do with the fact that only Wahabis/Hanbalis have surplus to finance Islamic terrorism. Do you expect bhooka nanga Pakistan and Afghanistan to finance Jihad machinery?

4. The love some Indians show for Iran here is irrational. I am stating this on an assumption that you are not a shia muslims (If you are, your support for Iran would be natural). Though our interests converge with Iran like they do with Afghanistan at this moment, Iran is not our brotherly country. The only country which would stand with us in thick and thin are Nepal and Bhutan. Thailand,Mauritius, Japan, are our cultural and political allies, while we have good relations with Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia,Maldives, Singapore, and Sri Lanka based on our total dominance of Indian Ocean.Myanmar and Vietnam look to us for balancing influence of China, while Africa look up to us as a non-western country capable of providing leadership. Israel is our ally because we both have same kind of problems and Israel is looking towards India and China as a replacement of US and Europe since Europe has turned left of left to the point of committing cultural suicide and US is going in that direction.

Our relationship with Iran, Arabs,CAR, and Afghanistan would always remain transactional due to racial and cultural differences.

Therefore there is no point in bashing one side or other in this Shia-Sunni war. None of them likes us, though they may be willing to work for profit and because most have no choice. After all both Arabs and Iran are in IOR and India taking side would fk up power balance in middle east.

 

[Styx]

Therefore there is no point in bashing one side or other in this Shia-Sunni war.

it's just such a shame to see those Saudi funded maniacs destroy Syria.

 

[T-Rex]

1. There is no Wahabi Islam. It is a slur used by non-Hanbali muslims to bash Hanbali muslims as bashing Hanbalis directly would lead to another Islamic civil war.This was a termed that has been popularized by non-Hanbali muslims to blame lay complete blame of Islamic terrorism at Saudi/Hanbali doorsteps so that they do not have to take any responsibility for Islamic terrorism.


2.Majority of Terrorists are non-Wahabi/Hanbali . Taliban are followers of Deoband which is a part of Sufi Islam, so are chechens, and I have not broached upon Shia terrorists which may be more in number on per-capita basis than sunnis. In fact Indians hating wahabis is frankly stupid. If we discount rise of Islamic fascism in state of Kerala, Wahabis have not been involved in any direct attack on India.Even in Kerala, it is sickular policies of Glorious Soviet Socialist Secular state of malluistan which are responsible for Islamic fascism.

In fact it is wanabee Arabs who are bigger Islamofascists than Arabs. Kerala's education minister refused to light a lamp at an international seminar stating that lighting lamps is infidel Hindu practice and lighting lamp would make him a kuffar, but Dubai's minister never had problem with inaugurating function with lighting lamps.



3. Most of funding for terrorists is done by Wahabis/Hanbalis. This is true but it has more to do with the fact that only Wahabis/Hanbalis have surplus to finance Islamic terrorism. Do you expect bhooka nanga Pakistan and Afghanistan to finance Jihad machinery?

4. The love some Indians show for Iran here is irrational. I am stating this on an assumption that you are not a shia muslims (If you are, your support for Iran would be natural). Though our interests converge with Iran like they do with Afghanistan at this moment, Iran is not our brotherly country. The only country which would stand with us in thick and thin are Nepal and Bhutan. Thailand,Mauritius, Japan, are our cultural and political allies, while we have good relations with Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia,Maldives, Singapore, and Sri Lanka based on our total dominance of Indian Ocean.Myanmar and Vietnam look to us for balancing influence of China, while Africa look up to us as a non-western country capable of providing leadership. Israel is our ally because we both have same kind of problems and Israel is looking towards India and China as a replacement of US and Europe since Europe has turned left of left to the point of committing cultural suicide and US is going in that direction.

Our relationship with Iran, Arabs,CAR, and Afghanistan would always remain transactional due to racial and cultural differences.

Therefore there is no point in bashing one side or other in this Shia-Sunni war. None of them likes us, though they may be willing to work for profit and because most have no choice. After all both Arabs and Iran are in IOR and India taking side would fk up power balance in middle east.

Very interesting observation; our sunni and shia brothers should read and learn as to where they stand in the eyes of the non-Muslim world.

 

[mike2000 is back]

nato's favorite puppet monarchy jumping again.

View attachment 245975

Loool

 

[HAIDER]

Sergei Lavrov, Russia called a colleague from Saudi Arabia morons

 

[jamahir]

Sergei Lavrov, Russia called a colleague from Saudi Arabia morons

what is the full translation??

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

Russia, Iran, Syria and Hezbollah could easily destabilize Saudi Arabia. Eventually those despots will get their comeuppance.

Hah ok .and others sits and watch ??

 

[Echo_419]

Tue Aug 11, 2015 6:21am EDT
Related: World
Saudi Foreign Minister says Assad has no place in Syria future| Reuters

Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir said on Tuesday Riyadh's position on the conflict in Syria has not changed and that there was no place for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in the future of the country.

He was speaking after talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Moscow, a long-standing ally of Assad in the conflict, amid a renewed diplomatic push to end the conflict in Syria because of gains on the ground by Islamic State.

(Reporting by Katya Golubkova, Writing by Gabriela Baczynska, Editing byDmitry Zhdannikov)

Assad needs to bomb this clown

"isis" aside, what about the rest of the syrian opposition ? they're all absolutely crawling with the worst kind of jihadi there is, qaeda, nusra and the rest are only a few degrees separated from them.

Agreed Asaad is the only the only hope for Syria right now

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

Apparently assad is doomed .

 

[T-Rex]

I don't understand why Iran is so adamant about defending a dead horse like Assad! It was a grave mistake like the Pakistanis made in 1971. If Iran hadn't intervened in Syria she would have had a strong ally in the sunni world as well. This blunder has paved the way for the zionazis to pose as an ally of the sunnis at least in Syria. How could the Iranian leaders not foresee this consequence? Are they really that much influenced by petty sectarian interests?

 

[Luffy 500]

The KSA FM should have reminded lavrov that russian drunkards have no place in ME affairs.

Assad should drop a few barrel bombs on his head.

We have a terrorist supporter here. I thought encouraging terrorist acts is not allowed in the forum. @Horus