What's new

Saudi Arabia to 'shift away from the US' over Iran, Syria

Status
Not open for further replies.

iranigirl2

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2012
Messages
2,470
Reaction score
1
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
United States
Saudi Arabia to 'shift away from the US' over Iran, Syria, intelligence chief says

DOHA, Qatar -- Saudi Arabia's intelligence chief has said the kingdom will make a "major shift" in relations with the United States in protest at its perceived inaction over the Syria war and its overtures to Iran, a source close to Saudi policy said on Tuesday.

Prince Bandar bin Sultan told European diplomats that Washington had failed to act effectively on the Syria crisis and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, was growing closer to Tehran, and had failed to back Saudi support for Bahrain when it crushed an anti-government revolt in 2011, the source said.

It was not immediately clear if Prince Bandar's reported statements had the full backing of King Abdullah.

"The shift away from the U.S. is a major one," the source close to Saudi policy said. "Saudi doesn't want to find itself any longer in a situation where it is dependent."



The United States and Saudi Arabia have been allies since the kingdom was declared in 1932, giving Riyadh a powerful military protector and Washington secure oil supplies.

The prince's initiative follows a surprise Saudi decision on Friday to reject a coveted two-year term on the U.N. Security Council in protest at "double standards" at the United Nations.

Prince Bandar, who was Saudi ambassador to Washington for 22 years, is seen as a foreign policy hawk, especially on Iran. The Sunni Muslim kingdom's rivalry with Shiite Iran, an ally of Syria, has amplified sectarian tensions across the Middle East.

A son of the late defense minister and crown prince, Prince Sultan, and a protégé of the late King Fahd, he fell from favor with King Abdullah after clashing on foreign policy in 2005.

But he was called in from the cold last year with a mandate to bring down President Bashar Assad, diplomats in the Gulf say. Over the past year he has led Saudi efforts to bring arms and other aid to Syrian rebels while his cousin, Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal, worked the diplomatic corridors.

"Prince Bandar told diplomats that he plans to limit interaction with the U.S.," the source close to Saudi policy said. "This happens after the U.S. failed to take any effective action on Syria and Palestine.

"Relations with the U.S. have been deteriorating for a while, as Saudi feels that the U.S. is growing closer with Iran and the U.S. also failed to support Saudi during the Bahrain uprising."

The source declined to provide more details of Bandar's talks with the diplomats, which took place in the past few days.

But he suggested that the planned change in ties between the energy superpower and its traditional U.S. ally would have wide-ranging consequences, including on arms purchases and oil sales.

Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest oil exporter, ploughs much of its earnings back into U.S. assets. Most of the Saudi central bank's net foreign assets of $690 billion are thought to be denominated in dollars, much of them in U.S. Treasury bonds.

"All options are on the table now, and for sure there will be some impact," the Saudi source said.

He said there would be no further coordination with the United States over the war in Syria, where the Saudis have armed and financed rebel groups fighting Assad.

The kingdom has informed the United States of its actions in Syria, and diplomats say it has respected U.S. requests not to supply the groups with advanced weaponry that the West fears could fall into the hands of al Qaeda-aligned groups.

Saudi anger boiled over after Washington refrained from military strikes in response to a poison gas attack in Damascus in August when Assad agreed to give up his chemical arsenal.

Saudi Arabia is also concerned about signs of a tentative reconciliation between Washington and Tehran, something Riyadh fears may lead to a "grand bargain" on the Iranian nuclear program that would leave it at a disadvantage.

The U.N. Security Council has been paralyzed over the 31-month-old Syria conflict, with permanent members Russia and China repeatedly blocking measures to condemn Assad.

Saudi Arabia backs Assad's mostly Sunni rebel foes. The Syrian leader, whose Alawite sect is derived from Shiite Islam, has support from Iran and the armed Lebanese Shiite movement Hezbollah. The Syrian leader denounces the insurgents as al Qaeda-linked groups backed by Sunni-ruled states.


In Bahrain, home of the U.S. Fifth Fleet, a simmering pro-democracy revolt by its Shiite majority has prompted calls by some in Washington for U.S. ships to base elsewhere.

Western policymakers say Bahrain's hosting of a U.S. naval base makes it a key ally in keeping open the Strait of Hormuz, conduit for 40 percent of the world's sea-borne oil exports.

Many U.S. economic interests in Saudi Arabia involve government contracts in defense, other security sectors, health care, education, information technology and construction.

But American businessmen in Riyadh, who did not want to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue, said they did not believe the political bumps in the U.S.-Saudi relationship would affect their business significantly.

"The big contracts are mostly government, but I don't see much political content in who gets the contracts," one said.


Saudi Arabia to 'shift away from the US' over Iran, Syria, intelligence chief says - World News
 
.
Safavids :lol:

wishful_thinking180.jpg
 
. . .
Saudi arabia

this much bigger country with a GDP to reach 1trillion in the next 5-6 years,A strategic point in the world,With equipments by technology among the top 5 in the world and a Defence budget of close to 50billon dollars and growing such an country should had its own policy and importance in the world.

Saudi arabia should have never relied on the USA and rather should had its own policy

KSA has more potential to atleast rule over the Islamic world than any other country,They just need better leaders.
 
.
Saudi arabia

this much bigger country with a GDP to reach 1trillion in the next 5-6 years,A strategic point in the world,With equipments by technology among the top 5 in the world and a Defence budget of close to 50billon dollars and growing such an country should had its own policy and importance in the world.

Saudi arabia should have never relied on the USA and rather should had its own policy

KSA has more potential to atleast rule over the Islamic world than any other country,They just need better leaders.

Bro,

We don't want to role a damn thing :lol: this kind of news were produced to satisfy self-esteem.
 
. .
Saudi arabia

this much bigger country with a GDP to reach 1trillion in the next 5-6 years,A strategic point in the world,With equipments by technology among the top 5 in the world and a Defence budget of close to 50billon dollars and growing such an country should had its own policy and importance in the world.

Saudi arabia should have never relied on the USA and rather should had its own policy

KSA has more potential to atleast rule over the Islamic world than any other country,They just need better leaders.

Eh, nobody is interested to rule anything. As great and giant as the Arab Caliphates were and long they ruled (nearly 1000 years) with dynasties all originally from Hijaz then this time and age is not the Middle Ages anymore. Besides there will never be one sole Muslim "leader country". For that to have happened China, USA or Russia should have been majority Muslim countries. There is not really one single global Muslim power and I doubt there will ever be one.

But yeah, nonsense article as the many posted by a certain group of people here that seem obsessed.

Besides as yoy say KSA will only continue to grow more powerful for each year. Besides the policy is independent. Being an ally of USA as most of the world countries are to some extent is not making the government unable to have their own say or political lines. Syria, Bahrain, UN and a lot of other issues are evidence of this.

And quite frankly I prefer to be an ally of USA rather than Russia. I would have wanted to have even closer ties to China though but that will probably come. All the directions point in that way.

Besides you tell the Americans to stop interfering in the region. From what I am aware of then nobody invited them, the British before them or the French.

Maybe Pakistan will chase America away and prevent the Iranian Mullah's from trying to suck up to them after having considered them a "devil" for 35 years.

I don't understand why so many Muslims believe that KSA can solve all the problems in the Muslim world and somehow challenge USA, LOL.

No offense bro. Not aimed at you but just an general observation I have made.
 
.
Saudi arabia

this much bigger country with a GDP to reach 1trillion in the next 5-6 years,A strategic point in the world,With equipments by technology among the top 5 in the world and a Defence budget of close to 50billon dollars and growing such an country should had its own policy and importance in the world.

Saudi arabia should have never relied on the USA and rather should had its own policy

KSA has more potential to atleast rule over the Islamic world than any other country,They just need better leaders.

who else will they go to?

and ARAMCO? It'll be disbanded just like that? The security pact? :laugh:


and the Islamic World doesn't need a "leader"....we are independent nations, in some cases we share little in common except religion. Lets come to grips with our differences and work with eachother based on the premise we are Islamic countries that have potential to be a 'bloc'


and that's wishful thinking....maybe the day Saudis and Iranians set aside their mentally retarded rivalries and centuries' old mistrust of eachother
 
.
by the time SA shifts away from US I would have grown 8 feet tail
 
.
who else will they go to?

and ARAMCO? It'll be disbanded just like that? The security pact? :laugh:

The hell are you talking about? How would Aramco get disbanded. Saudi arabia along with GCC are capable of bringing the US down to its knees if we want to. Also, what security pact are you referring to? What!! do you know something about my country that I don't?

and the Islamic World doesn't need a "leader"....we are independent nations, in some cases we share little in common except religion. Lets come to grips with our differences and work with eachother based on the premise we are Islamic countries that have potential to be a 'bloc'

No doubt.

and that's wishful thinking....maybe the day Saudis and Iranians set aside their mentally retarded rivalries and centuries' old mistrust of eachother

Maybe we need to reconquer Iran for peace and prosperity to prevail.
 
.
Hah! Aramco was nationalized 40ish years ago, welcome to present.
who else will they go to?

and ARAMCO? It'll be disbanded just like that? The security pact? :laugh:


and the Islamic World doesn't need a "leader"....we are independent nations, in some cases we share little in common except religion. Lets come to grips with our differences and work with eachother based on the premise we are Islamic countries that have potential to be a 'bloc'


and that's wishful thinking....maybe the day Saudis and Iranians set aside their mentally retarded rivalries and centuries' old mistrust of eachother

I agree, we aren't responsible for the whole Muslim nations on the planet. Our leaders should stop giving blank checks.

by the time SA shifts away from US I would have grown 8 feet tail

The tail started growing already, soon they will ship you out from Canada to where you came from :lol: ...
 
.
The hell are you talking about? How would Aramco get disbanded. Saudi arabia along with GCC are capable of bringing the US down to its knees if we want to. Also, what security pact are you referring to? What!! do you know something about my country that I don't?



No doubt.



Maybe we need to reconquer Iran for peace and prosperity to prevail.

Reconquer Iran....Bring US to its knees...
The delusions running in these Saudis veins are comedy :lol:
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom